No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Modification of milk resulting in low potassium and minimal electrolyte changes with minimal changes in taste
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 April 2022
Abstract
The objective of this research communication was to produce low potassium milk in which other electrolyte changes and changes in taste were minimized. To reduce potassium concentrations, several studies have reported batch methods of directly mixing milk or formula with sodium polystyrene sulfonate, which can exchange cations such as potassium for sodium. However, they also reported increases in sodium content, decreases in calcium and magnesium content, and changes in taste, because sodium polystyrene sulfonate exchanged other substances such as calcium and magnesium for sodium. In the present study, a method of dialyzing whole cow's milk using both sodium polystyrene sulfonate and a small amount of water through cellophane membranes was developed. A batch method for comparison was also performed. Each milk sample was evaluated biochemically and analyzed for taste and aroma in a sensory analysis. We showed that the potassium concentration in the dialyzed milk was reduced to 38% of that in unreacted milk. It was also shown that changes in sodium (increased) as well as calcium and magnesium (decreased) in the dialyzed milk were less than half of those in the batch method milk. Sensory analysis showed that minimal changes occurred in the taste of the dialyzed milk.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation
References
Berlyne, GM and Epstein, N (1971) Dialysed milk in low-sodium and low-potassium diets for renal, hepatic, and cardiac disease. Lancet (London, England) 2, 24–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunchman, TE, Wood, EG, Schenck, MH, Weaver, KA, Klein, BL and Lynch, RE (1991) Pretreatment of formula with sodium polystyrene sulfonate to reduce dietary potassium intake. Pediatric Nephrology 5, 29–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burkitt, LL, Wales, WJ, McDonald, JW, Small, DR and Jenkin, ML (2007) Comparing irrigated biodynamic and conventionally managed dairy farms. 2. Milk production and composition and animal health. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 489–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corina, M, Florin, B, Ciprian, I, Mariana, G and Bianca, P (2015) The dosage of the ions of magnesium in the milk. Analele Universitatii din Oradea, Fascicula Protectia Mediului 24, 365–368.Google Scholar
Fox, P and Hearn, C (1978) Heat stability of milk: influence of dilution and dialysis against water. Journal of Dairy Research 45, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujikawa, S and Kawamura, S (2013) Taste evaluation of drinking milk by physicochemical properties and sensory determinations. Journal of the Japanese Society of Agricultural Machinery 75, 37–44, [in Japanese].Google Scholar
Japanese Standards Association (2004) JIS Z 9080: 2004 Sensory analysis – Methodology.Google Scholar
Keast, RSJ and Breslin, PAS (2003) An overview of binary taste-taste interactions. Food Quality and Preference 14, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, Y, Habara, M, Ikezaki, H, Chen, R, Naito, Y and Toko, K (2010) Advanced taste sensors based on artificial lipids with global selectivity to basic taste qualities and high correlation to sensory scores. Sensors (Basel) 10, 3411–3443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Komatsu, Y, Tamai, S, Toyoda, I and Nakaoka, A (2005) Cream and processed cream products having excellent flavor and physical properties and method of producing the same. European Patent Office No.1825759B1.Google Scholar
Lehnhardt, A and Kemper, MJ (2011) Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of hyperkalemia. Pediatric Nephrology 26, 377–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neese, JW, Duncan, P, Bayse, D, Robinson, M, Cooper, T and Stewart, C (1976) Development and evaluation of a Hexokinase/Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase procedure for use as a national glucose reference method. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.Google Scholar
Oh, HE and Deeth, HC (2017) Magnesium in milk. International Dairy Journal 71, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picq, C, Asplanato, M, Bernillon, N, Fabre, C, Roubeix, M and Ricort, JM (2014) Effects of water soaking and/or sodium polystyrene sulfonate addition on potassium content of foods. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 65, 673–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ranjith, HM, Lewis, MJ and Maw, D (1999) Production of calcium-reduced milks using an ion-exchange resin. Journal of Dairy Research 66, 139–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roadhouse, CL and Koestler, GA (1929) Contribution to the knowledge of the taste of milk. Journal of Dairy Science 12, 421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, D, Ye, A, Moughan, PJ and Singh, H (2020) Composition, structure, and digestive dynamics of milk from different species–A review. Frontiers in Nutrition 7, 577759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shipe, WF (1959) The freezing point of milk. A review. Journal of Dairy Science 42, 1745–1762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, JM, Oladitan, L, Carlson, S and Hamilton-Reeves, JM (2015) Renal formulas pretreated with medications alters the nutrient profile. Pediatric Nephrology 30, 1815–1823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, AJ and Magowan, M (1975) Principles of dialysis. In The Renal Unit. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd, pp 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zannier, MS, Minetti, ML, Sbodio, OA and Revelli, GR (2002) Sodium, potassium and chloride contents in individual cow milk determined by the ion selective electrode method. Informacion Tecnologica 13, 61–67, [in Spanish].Google Scholar
Hara supplementary material
Hara supplementary material
PDF
277.5 KB