Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T05:19:10.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lack of evidence of IgE allergic sensitisation from working with lactic acid bacteria in the dairy foods industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2018

Coralie Barrera ,
Gabriel Reboux ,
Audrey Laboissière ,
Laurence Millon  and
Anne Oppliger
Coralie Barrera
Affiliation:
UMR/CNRS 6249 Chrono-Environnement, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UFR Sciences médicales et pharmaceutiques, 19 rue Ambroise Paré, 25030 Besançon, France Department of Parasitology-Mycology, University Hospital, 2Bd Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France
Gabriel Reboux*
Affiliation:
UMR/CNRS 6249 Chrono-Environnement, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UFR Sciences médicales et pharmaceutiques, 19 rue Ambroise Paré, 25030 Besançon, France Department of Parasitology-Mycology, University Hospital, 2Bd Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France
Audrey Laboissière
Affiliation:
UMR/CNRS 6249 Chrono-Environnement, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UFR Sciences médicales et pharmaceutiques, 19 rue Ambroise Paré, 25030 Besançon, France Department of Parasitology-Mycology, University Hospital, 2Bd Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France
Laurence Millon
Affiliation:
UMR/CNRS 6249 Chrono-Environnement, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UFR Sciences médicales et pharmaceutiques, 19 rue Ambroise Paré, 25030 Besançon, France Department of Parasitology-Mycology, University Hospital, 2Bd Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France
Anne Oppliger
Affiliation:
Institute of Work and Health, University of Lausanne, route de la Corniche 2, 1066 Epalinges-Lausanne, Switzerland
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This research communication aimed to evaluate the level of immunoglobulin E from lactic acid bacteria (LAB) that are used in dairy industries. Previous studies have demonstrated that workers report symptoms of irritation and are frequently IgG-sensitised to LAB. Workers (n = 44) from a probiotic production unity and the control lab were seen by a medical practitioner and responded to an occupational questionnaire. Specific IgE by the DELFIA® technique against 6 strains of LAB were measured on 44 exposed workers and 31 controls sera. Levels of specific IgE were low and no difference was observed between the two groups. This lack of IgE response could be explained by a healthy worker effect, an efficient implementation of personal protective equipment or by an absence of allergic mechanisms to account for the self-reported irritative symptoms. Despite the high concentrations of LAB, preventive measures are effective enough to guarantee no allergic effect and to prevent other adverse health effects. The implementation of preventive measures to avoid or reduce exposure to dust of LAB, and more generally to milk powder, is recommended in all dairy industry.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 85 , Issue 3 , August 2018 , pp. 355 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Hannah Dairy Research Foundation 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrera, C, Richaud-Thiriez, B, Rocchi, S, Rognon, B, Roussel, S, Grenouillet, F, Laboissiere, A, Dalphin, JC, Reboux, G & Millon, L 2016 New commercially available IgG kits and time-resolved fluorometric IgE assay for allergic broncho-pulmonary aspergillosis diagnosis in cystic fibrosis patients. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 23 196–203Google Scholar
Bittner, C, Garrido, MV, Harth, V & Preisser, AM 2016 Ige reactivity, work related allergic symptoms, asthma severity, and quality of life in bakers with occupational asthma. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 921 51–60Google Scholar
Dorribo, V, Wild, P, Pralong, JA, Danuser, B, Reboux, G, Krief, P & Niculita-Hirzel, H 2015 Respiratory health effects of fifteen years of improved collective protection in a wheat-processing worker population. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 22 647–654Google Scholar
Paris, C, Herin, F, Penven, E, Thaon, I, Richard, C, Jacquenet, S, Barbaud, A & Poussel, M 2016 First evidence of occupational asthma to argan powder in a cosmetic factory. Allergy 71 550–555Google Scholar
Roussel, S, Reboux, G, Millon, L, Parchas, MD, Boudih, S, Skana, F, Delaforge, M & Rakotonirainy, MS 2012 Microbiological evaluation of ten French archives and link to occupational symptoms. Indoor Air 22 514–522Google Scholar
Snydman, DR 2008 The safety of probiotics. Clinical Infectious Disease 46 104–111Google Scholar
Sripaiboonkij, P, Phanprasit, W & Jaakkola, MS 2008 Respiratory effects of occupational exposures in a milk powder factory. European Respiratory Journal 31 807–814Google Scholar
van Kampen, V, Deckert, A, Hoffmeyer, F, Taeger, D, Brinkmann, E, Brüning, T, Raulf-Heimsoth, M & Bünger, J 2012 Symptoms, spirometry, and serum antibody concentrations Among compost workers exposed to organic dust. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 75 492–500Google Scholar
Zeilfelder, B, Chouanière, D, Reboux, G, Vacheyrou, M, Milon, A, Wild, P & Oppliger, A 2012 Health effects of occupational exposure in a dairy food industry, with a specific assessment of exposure to airborne lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 54 969–973Google Scholar