Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:06:59.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of processing and packaging conditions on probiotic survivability rate, physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of low calorie synbiotic milk beverage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2022

Prittam Chand ,
M Dharani Kumar ,
Ashish Kumar Singh ,
Gaurav Kr Deshwal ,
Priyanka Singh Rao  and
Heena Sharma
Prittam Chand
Affiliation:
Food Technology Lab, Dairy Technology Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India
M Dharani Kumar
Affiliation:
Food Technology Lab, Dairy Technology Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India
Ashish Kumar Singh
Affiliation:
Food Technology Lab, Dairy Technology Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India
Gaurav Kr Deshwal
Affiliation:
Food Technology Lab, Dairy Technology Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India
Priyanka Singh Rao
Affiliation:
Dairy Chemistry and Bacteriology Section, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Southern Regional Station, Bengaluru 560030, India
Heena Sharma*
Affiliation:
Food Technology Lab, Dairy Technology Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India
*
Author for correspondence: Heena Sharma, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The work presented in this research communication was carried out to prepare low calorie synbiotic milk beverage by optimizing water and sugar level and to investigate the effect on its storage ability of different packaging materials (polypropylene, high impact polystyrene, high-density polyethylene and glass). Addition of both water and sugar significantly (P < 0.05) affected the viscosity, probiotic count and sensory properties. Based on the findings, 40% water and 8% sugar level were optimized for the preparation of the beverage. Apparent viscosity and acidity increased whilst pH and probiotic counts declined during storage, irrespective of packaging materials. The prepared beverage remained most acceptable at refrigeration temperature up to a period of 15 and 12 d when packaged in glass and high impact polystyrene, respectively. Furthermore, it retained a minimum recommended level of probiotic (7 log cfu/ml) during storage for 15 d at 4 °C.

Keywords

Low-calorie synbiotic beveragepackaging materialsprebioticsprobioticsstorage stability
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 89 , Issue 1 , February 2022 , pp. 94 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AOAC (2000) Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agriculture Chemists. Washington, DC: Association of Analytical Chemists, pp. 125–139.Google Scholar
Cavalcante, D, Campos, DS and Timoni, L (2016) Post-acidification and evaluation of anthocyanins stability and anti-oxidant activity in acai fermented milk and yogurts (Euterpe oleracea Mart.). Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 39, e-871.Google Scholar
Chand, P, Kumar, MD, Kumar, AS, Deshwal, GK, Rao, PS, Tomar, SK and Sharma, H (2021) Low-calorie synbiotic yoghurt from indigenous probiotic culture and combination of inulin and oligofructose: improved sensory, rheological and textural attributes. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 45, e15322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Sayed, SM and El-Sayed, HS (2020) Production of UF-soft cheese using probiotic bacteria and Aloe vera pulp as a good source of nutrients. Annals of Agricultural Sciences 65, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazilah, NF, Ariff, AB, Khayat, ME, Rios-Solis, L and Halim, M (2018) Influence of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and bioactive phytochemicals on the formulation of functional yogurt. Journal of Functional Foods 48, 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glušac, J, Stijepić, M, Durdević-Milošević, D, Milanovic, S, Kanuric, K and Vukic, V (2015) Growth and viability of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus in traditional yoghurt enriched by honey and whey protein concentrate. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research 16, 249–254.Google ScholarPubMed
Guo, Z, Wang, J, Yan, L, Chen, W, Liu, XM and Zhang, HP (2009) In vitro comparison of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus casei Zhang, a potential new probiotic, with selected probiotic strains. LWT-Food Science and Technology 42, 1640–1646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haji Ghafarloo, M, Jouki, M and Tabari, M (2020) Production and characterization of synbiotic Doogh, a yogurt-based Iranian drink by gum arabic, ginger extract and B. bifidum. Journal of Food Science and Technology 57, 1158–1166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ibrahim, SA, Gyawali, R, Awaisheh, SS, Ayivi, RD, Silva, RC, Subedi, K, Aljaloud, SO, Siddiqui, SA and Krastanov, A (2021) Fermented foods and probiotics: an approach to lactose intolerance. Journal of Dairy Research 88, 357–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IS:5401 (2002) General Guidance for the enumeration of coliforms (Part I). Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Ishibashi, N and Shimamura, S (1993) Bifidobacteria: research and development in Japan. Food Technology 47, 126–136.Google Scholar
Jirasatid, S and Nopharatana, M (2020) Impact of coconut sugar syrup on quality of acidophilus milk during cold storage. International Journal of Agricultural Technology 16, 819–830.Google Scholar
Kaur, M, Chawla, R, Mishra, SK and Sivakumar, S (2019) Quality characteristics of ready-to-serve (RTS) thandai beverage during storage. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 72, 599–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani-López, E, Palou, E and López-Malo, A (2014) Probiotic viability and storage stability of yogurts and fermented milks prepared with several mixtures of lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 2578–2590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paul-Sadhu, S (2016) Impact of low refrigeration temperature on colour of milk. Acta Alimentaria 45, 390–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarwar, A, Aziz, T, Al-Dalali, S, Zhao, X, Zhang, J, Din, J, Chen, C, Cao, Y and Yang, Z (2019) Physicochemical and microbiological properties of synbiotic yogurt made with probiotic yeast Saccharomyces boulardii in combination with inulin. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) 8, 468.Google ScholarPubMed
Sharma, H, Rao, PS and Singh, AK (2021a) Fifty Years of Research on Tinospora cordifolia: from botanical plant to functional ingredients in foods. Trends in Food Science and Technology 118, 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, H, Ozogul, F, Bartkiene, E and Rocha, JM (2021b) Impact of lactic acid bacteria and their metabolites on the techno-functional properties and health benefits of fermented dairy products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 30, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, H, Singh, AK, Deshwal, GK, Rao, PS and Kumar, DM (2021c) Functional Tinospora cordifolia (giloy) based pasteurized goat milk beverage: Impact of milk protein-polyphenol interaction on bioactive compounds, anti-oxidant activity and microstructure. Food Bioscience 42, 101101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somashekaraiah, R, Shruthi, B, Deepthi B, V and Sreenivasa, MY (2019) Probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Neera: a naturally fermenting coconut palm nectar. Frontiers in Microbiology 10, 1382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tirloni, E, Vasconi, M, Cattaneo, P, Moretti, V, Bellagamba, F, Bernardi, C and Stella, S (2020) A possible solution to minimise scotta as a food waste: a sports beverage. International Journal of Dairy Technology 73, 421–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C, Liang, S, Wang, H and Guo, M (2018) Physiochemical properties and probiotic survivability of symbiotic oat-based beverage. Food Science and Biotechnology 27, 735–743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zahed, O, Khosravi-Darani, K, Mortazavian Farsani, SA and Mohammadi, A (2021) Bacterial conjugated linoleic acid bio-fortification of synbiotic yogurts using Propionibacterium freudenreichii as adjunct culture. Italian Journal of Food Science 33, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Chand et al. supplementary material

Chand et al. supplementary material

Download Chand et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 135.3 KB