Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:57:45.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of a synthetic analogue of the Bovine Appeasing Pheromone on milk yield and composition in Valdostana dairy cows during the move from winter housing to confined lowland pastures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2018

Maria Cristina Osella ,
Alessandro Cozzi ,
Claudio Spegis ,
Germano Turille ,
Andrea Barmaz ,
Céline Lafont Lecuelle ,
Eva Teruel ,
Cécile Bienboire-Frosini ,
Camille Chabaud  and
Laurent Bougrat
...Show all authors
Maria Cristina Osella*
Affiliation:
IRSEA Research Institute Semiochemistry and Applied Ethology, Apt, France
Alessandro Cozzi
Affiliation:
IRSEA Research Institute Semiochemistry and Applied Ethology, Apt, France
Claudio Spegis
Affiliation:
IRSEA Research Institute Semiochemistry and Applied Ethology, Apt, France
Germano Turille
Affiliation:
IAR Institut Agricole Régional, Aoste, Italy
Andrea Barmaz
Affiliation:
IAR Institut Agricole Régional, Aoste, Italy
Céline Lafont Lecuelle
Affiliation:
IRSEA Research Institute Semiochemistry and Applied Ethology, Apt, France
Eva Teruel
Affiliation:
IRSEA Research Institute Semiochemistry and Applied Ethology, Apt, France
Cécile Bienboire-Frosini
Affiliation:
IRSEA Research Institute Semiochemistry and Applied Ethology, Apt, France
Camille Chabaud
Affiliation:
IRSEA Research Institute Semiochemistry and Applied Ethology, Apt, France
Laurent Bougrat
Affiliation:
IRSEA Research Institute Semiochemistry and Applied Ethology, Apt, France
Patrick Pageat
Affiliation:
IRSEA Research Institute Semiochemistry and Applied Ethology, Apt, France
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This Research Communication describes the effects of a synthetic analogue of the Bovine Appeasing Pheromone (BAP) on milk parameters in Valdostana dairy cows during the first turning out from tie-stalls to confined lowland pastures around the farms. Thirty healthy lactating Valdostana cows were enroled in the study and randomly divided into 2 groups: experimental group (EG, n = 15) and control group (CG, n = 15). The two groups were separately housed in the same farm and managed outside in two different pens. Treatment (BAP and solution) and control (solution only) were poured on the nuchal skin area between the horns when the animals were inside the farm at the feeding rack every 7 d for 28 d (T0–T4). Milk samples were evaluated at the same time points (T0–T4). Daily milk production (kg/day) was higher in the EG than in the CG, particularly during the first day after the turning out to pasture (T1). Somatic Cell Count (103 cells/ml) was higher in the placebo group than in the EG, especially at T1. Proteins, fat, fat-free dry matter and casein (g/100 g) were not affected by the treatment. In T1 urea (mg/dl) content was higher in CG vs. EG, suggesting a more correct metabolic balance in the group treated with BAP. The use of BAP appears to modulate adaptation in ways that may improve dairy cow performance in the context of changes in management routines.

Keywords

Bovine appeasing pheromoneValdostana dairy cowsmilk yieldmilk variables
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 85 , Issue 2 , May 2018 , pp. 174 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © Hannah Dairy Research Foundation 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Equal contributor as first author

References

Bobić, T, Mijić, P, Knežević, I, Šperanda, M, Antunović, B, Baban, M, Sakač, M, Frizon, E & Koturić, T 2011 The impact of environmental factors on the milk ejection and stress of dairy cows. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 27 919–927Google Scholar
Comin, A., Prandi, A, Peric, T, Corazzin, M, Dovier, S and Bovolenta, S 2011 Hair cortisol levels in dairy cows from winter housing to summer highland grazing. Livestock Science 138 69–73Google Scholar
Madec, I, Gaultier, E & Pageat, P 2001a Assessment of the effect of bovine appeasing pheromone on veal calves. Proc. 35th Congress of the ISAE, Centre for Animal Welfare, UC Davis, USA, p. 78Google Scholar
Madec, I, Gaultier, E & Pageat, P 2001b Effect of bovine appeasing pheromone on young bovine performance. Proc. 35th Congress of the ISAE, Centre for Animal Welfare, UC Davis, USA, p. 191Google Scholar
Mazal, G, Vianna, PC, Santos, MV & Gigante, ML 2007 Effect of somatic cell count on Prato cheese composition. Journal of Dairy Science 90 630–636Google Scholar
Pageat, P 1998 Appeasing Pheromones to decrease stress, anxiety and aggressiveness. European patent EP 0 948 963 A1; US Patent 6,054,481; US Patent 6,077,867; US Patent US 6,169,113 B1; Japan Patent 2000-528279; Japan Patent 980298Google Scholar
Romanzin, A, Corazzin, M, Piasentier, E & Bovolenta, S 2013 Effect of rearing system (mountain pasture vs. Indoor) of Simmental cows on milk composition and Montasio cheese characteristics. Journal of Dairy Research 80 390–399Google Scholar
Sartori, C, Manser, MB & Mantovani, R 2014 Relationship between number and intensity of fighting: evidence from cow fighting tournaments in Valdostana cattle. Italian Journal of Animal Science 13 684–692Google Scholar
von Keyserlingk, MAG, Olenick, D & Weary, DM 2008 Acute behavioural effects of regrouping dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91 1011–1016Google Scholar
Wredle, E, Östenssonb, K & Svennersten-Sjaunjaa, K 2014 The effect of pasture turnout on milk somatic cell count, polymorphonuclear leukocytes and milk composition in cows housed in tie stalls. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 64 226–232Google Scholar