Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T07:06:44.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of relocation on locomotion and cleanliness in dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2007

Crafton O Wilkes ,
Kristen J Pence ,
Amanda M Hurt ,
Ondrej Becvar ,
Katharine F Knowlton ,
Michael L McGilliard  and
Francis C Gwazdauskas
Crafton O Wilkes
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061-0315, USA
Kristen J Pence
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061-0315, USA
Amanda M Hurt
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061-0315, USA
Ondrej Becvar
Affiliation:
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061-0315, USA
Katharine F Knowlton
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061-0315, USA
Michael L McGilliard
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061-0315, USA
Francis C Gwazdauskas*
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061-0315, USA
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effect that relocation to a new free stall barn had on locomotion and cleanliness of two breeds of dairy cows. The original facility before relocation had cows housed in an 8-row free stall barn. Cows were allocated in a new 4-row free stall facility: cows of two breeds (n=22 Holsteins and 22 Jerseys) were intermixed in the northwest section. Locomotion (scale 1–5) and cleanliness were scored (scale 1–4). Holsteins and Jerseys had no difference in locomotion score throughout 12 weeks following relocation. A lactation number by date interaction showed cows in third and greater lactations had significantly higher locomotion scores (more lameness) by day 86. Locomotion scores increased across breeds during the 86-d observation period, suggesting cows became lamer. Jerseys had cleaner lower legs than Holsteins (2·9±0·1 v. 3·5±0·1, respectively). Lactation number affected lower leg cleanliness, with scores decreasing as lactation number increased (3·4 v. 3·3 v. 2·9±0·10 for first, second and third and greater lactations, respectively; P<0·01). All cows were cleaner (lower scores) after relocation, suggesting that the new facility improved hygiene.

Keywords

Hygienelocomotionrelocationdairy cow
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 19 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albright, JL, Youngblut, DH, Arave, CW & Wilson, JC 1975 Bovine laterality; resting behavior. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 85 407Google Scholar
Barkema, HW, Westrik, JD, van Keulen, KAS, Schukken, YH & Brand, A 1994 The effects of lameness on reproductive performance, milk production and culling in Dutch Dairy Farms. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 20 249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, SL 2001 Locomotion Scoring of Dairy Cattle. Eden Prairie MN USA: Zinpro Corp.Google Scholar
Bray, DR, Beede, DK & DeLorenzo, MA 1992 Environmental modifications for reducing summer stress on Florida dairy farms. Proceedings of the 29th Florida Dairy Production Conference, Gainesville FL, USA. p. 76Google Scholar
Cook, NB 2002 Hygiene Score Chart. Online. Available: http://www.vetmed.wisc.edu/dms/fapm/fapmtools/4hygiene/hygiene.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cook, NB, Bennett, TB & Nordlund, KV 2004 Effect of free stall surface on daily activity patterns in dairy cows with relevance to lameness prevalence. Journal of Dairy Science 87 2912–2922CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Passille, AM & Rushen, J 2006 Improved methods for detecting lameness in dairy cows and the effects of hoof trimming. ISAE North American Regional Meeting p. 40Google Scholar
Eddy, RG & Scott, CP 1980 Some observations on the incidence of lameness in dairy cattle in Somerset Veterinary Record 106 140–144CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endres, MI, DeVries, TJ, von Keyserlingk, MAG & Weary, DM 2005 Effect of feed barrier design on the behavior of loose-housed lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88 2377–2380CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heng, M & Murata, K 2004 Aging of concrete buildings and determining the pH value on the surface of concrete by using a handy semi-conductive pH meter. Analytical Science 20 1087–1090Google Scholar
Misselbrook, TH, Powell, JM, Broderick, GA & Grabber, JH 2005 Dietary manipulation in dairy cattle: Laboratory experiments to assess the influence on ammonia emissions. Journal of Dairy Science 88 1765–1777Google Scholar
Nordlund, KV & Cook, NB 2003 A flowchart for evaluating dairy cow freestalls. Bovine Practitioner 37 89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterse, DJ 1985 Breeding. Cattle Footcare and Claw Trimming. Ipswich, UK: Farming Press, Ltd. pp. 121–123Google Scholar
Phillips, CJC & Morris, ID 2001 The locomotion of dairy cows on floor surfaces with different frictional properties. Journal of Dairy Science 84 623–628Google Scholar
Sanaa, M, Pourel, B, Menard, JL & Serieys, F 1993 Risk factors associated with contamination of raw milk by Listeria monocytogenes in dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 76 2891–2898CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS 1999 User's Guide: Statistics, Version 8 Edition 2.SAS Inst., Inc., Cary NC, USAGoogle Scholar
Schreiner, DA & Ruegg, PL 2003 Relationship between udder and leg hygiene scores and subclinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 86 3460–3465CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sprecher, DJ, Hostetler, DE & Kaneene, JB 1997 A lameness scoring system that uses posture and gait to predict diary cattle reproductive performance. Theriogenology 47 1179–1187Google Scholar
Tucker, CB, Weary, DM, de Passille, AM, Campbell, B & Rushen, J 2006 Flooring in front of the feed bunk affects feeding behavior and use of freestalls by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89 2065–2071Google Scholar
Tucker, CB, Weary, DM & Fraser, D 2004 Free-stall dimensions: Effects on preference and stall usage. Journal of Dairy Science 87 1208–1216Google Scholar
Tucker, CB, Weary, DM & Fraser, D 2005 Influence of neck-rail placement on free-stall preference, use and cleanliness. Journal of Dairy Science 88 2730–2737Google Scholar
van Amstel, SR, Shearer, JK & Palin, FL 2004 Moisture content, thickness, and lesions of sole horn associated with thin soles in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 87 757–763Google Scholar
van der Tol, PPJ, Metz, JHM, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN, Back, W, Braam, CR & Weijs, WA 2005 Frictional forces required for unrestrained locomotion in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 88 615–624Google Scholar
Vokey, FJ, Guard, CL, Erb, HN & Galton, DM 2001 Effects of alley and stall surfaces on indices of claw and leg health in dairy cattle housed in a free-stall barn. Journal of Dairy Science 84 2686–2699Google Scholar