Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:27:46.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antibiotic survey of Lactococcus lactis strains to six antibiotics by Etest, and establishment of new susceptibility-resistance cut-off values

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2007

Ana Belén Flórez ,
Morten Danielsen ,
Jenni Korhonen ,
Joanna Zycka ,
Atte von Wright ,
Jacek Bardowski  and
Baltasar Mayo
Ana Belén Flórez
Affiliation:
Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias (CSIC), Carretera de Infiesto s/n, 33300-Villaviciosa, Asturias, Spain
Morten Danielsen
Affiliation:
Chr. Hansen A/S, Bøge Allé 10-12, DK-2970 Hørsholm, Denmark
Jenni Korhonen
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biotechnology, University of Kuopio, Bioteknia 2, PO Box 1627, Kuopio, Finland
Joanna Zycka
Affiliation:
Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawinskiego 5a, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
Atte von Wright
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biotechnology, University of Kuopio, Bioteknia 2, PO Box 1627, Kuopio, Finland
Jacek Bardowski
Affiliation:
Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawinskiego 5a, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
Baltasar Mayo*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias (CSIC), Carretera de Infiesto s/n, 33300-Villaviciosa, Asturias, Spain
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In order to establish cut-off values for Lactococcus lactis to six antibiotics to distinguish susceptible and intrinsically resistant strains from those having acquired resistances, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of tetracycline, erythromycin, clindamycin, streptomycin, chloramphenicol and vancomycin was determined in 93 different Lc. lactis strains using the Etest. These bacterial strains were originally isolated from dairy and animal sources in widely separated geographical locations. Cut-offs were defined on the basis of the distribution of the MICs frequency of the studied antibiotics, which in the absence of acquired determinants should approach to a normal statistical distribution. In general, the new cut-off values proposed in this study are higher than previously defined (European Commission, 2005. The EFSA Journal 223, 1–12). Based on these new values, all the strains tested were susceptible to erythromycin, chloramphenicol and vancomycin, and 79 susceptible to all six antibiotics. However, 11 strains (around 12%) were considered resistant to tetracycline (six of which had been identified after screening of a large collection of lactococci strains for tetracycline resistance) and five (5·4%) resistant to streptomycin. Of these, two fish isolates proved to be resistance to both tetracycline and streptomycin. From the tetracycline resistant strains, tet(M) and mosaic tet(L/S) genes were amplified by PCR, demonstrating they harboured acquired antibiotic resistance determinants.

Keywords

Lactococcus lactissusceptibility testingminimum inhibitory concentrationEtestantimicrobial resistancetetracycline resistance
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , August 2007 , pp. 262 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennish, ML 1999 Animals, humans, and antibiotics: implications of the veterinary use of antibiotics on human health. Advances in Pediatric Infection Diseases 14 269–290Google ScholarPubMed
Charteris, WP, Kelly, PM, Morelli, L & Collins, JK 2001 Gradient diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing of potentially probiotic lactobacilli. Journal of Food Protection 64 2007–2014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chopra, I & Roberts, M 2001 Tetracycline antibiotics: mode of action, applications, molecular biology, and epidemiology of bacterial resistance. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 66 232–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clermont, D, Chesneau, O, De Cespédès, G & Horaud, T 1997 New tetracycline resistance determinants coding for ribosomal protection in streptococci and nucleotide sequence of tet(T) isolated from Streptococcus pyogenes A498. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 41 112–116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clewell, DB, Flannagan, SE & Jaworsky, DD 1995 Unconstrained bacterial promiscuity: the Tn916-Tn1545 family of conjugative transposon. Trends in Microbiology 3 229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) 2004 Methods for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria: Approved Standard-six edition. M11-A6, Vol. 24, n° 2. Wayne, Pennsylvania, USA.Google Scholar
Cogan, TM 1972 Susceptibility of cheese and yogurt starter bacteria to antibiotics. Applied Microbiology 23 960–965CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delgado, S, Delgado, T & Mayo, B 2002 Technological performance of several Lactococcus and Enterococcus strains of dairy origin in milk. Journal of Food Protection 65 1590–1596CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delgado, S & Mayo, B 2004 Phenotypic and genetic diversity of Lactococcus lactis and Enterococcus spp. strains isolated from Northern Spain starter-free farmhouse cheeses. International Journal of Food Microbiology 90 309–319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliot, JA & Facklam, RR 1996 Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Lactococcus lactis and Lactococcus garviae and a proposed method to discriminate between them. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 34 1296–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission 2005 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) on the updating of the criteria used in the assessment of bacteria for resistance to antibiotics of human and veterinary importance. The EFSA Journal 223 1–12Google Scholar
Flórez, AB, Delgado, S & Mayo, B 2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of lactic acid bacteria isolated from a cheese environment. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 51 51–58CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, PF, Guinee, TP, Cogan, TM & McSweeney, PLH 2000 Fundamentals of Cheese Science. AN Aspen Publishers Inc., Gaithersburg, Ma., USAGoogle Scholar
Gasson, MJ & Fitzgerald, GF 1994 Gene transfer systems and transposition. In Genetics and Biotechnology of Lactic Acid Bacteria, pp. 1–51 (Eds Gasson, MJ & de Vos, WM). London: Blackie Academic and ProfessionalCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gevers, D, Danielsen, M, Huys, G & Swings, J 2003 Molecular characterization of tet(M) genes in Lactobacillus isolates from different types of fermented dry sausage. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69 1270–1275CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, M, Wadowsky, RM & Barbadora, K 1990 Recovery of vancomycin-resistant Gram-positive cocci from children. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 28 484–488CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guarner, F & Malagelada, JR 2003 Gut flora in health and disease. Lancet 360 512–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagi, T, Tanaka, D, Iwamura, Y & Hoshimo, T 2004 Diversity and seasonal changes in lactic acid bacteria in the intestinal tract of cultured freshwater fish. Aquaculture 234 335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton-Miller, JM 2004 Antibiotic resistance from two perspectives: man and microbe. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 23 209–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hols, P, Kleerebezem, M, Schanck, AN, Ferain, T, Hugenholtz, J, Delcour, J & de Vos, WM 1999 Conversion of Lactococcus lactis from homolactic to homoalanine fermentation through metabolic engineering. Nature Biotechnology 17 588–592CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huys, G, D'Haene, K & Swings, J 2002 Influence of the culture medium on antibiotic susceptibility testing of food-associated lactic acid bacteria with the agar overlay disc diffusion method. Letters in Applied Microbiology 34 402–406CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katla, AK, Kruse, H, Johnsen, G & Herikstad, H 2001 Antimicrobial susceptibility of starter culture bacteria used in Norwegian dairy products. International Journal of Food Microbiology 67 147–152CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klijn, N, Weerkamp, AH & de Vos, WM 1995 Detection and characterization of lactose-utilizing Lactococcus spp. in natural ecosystems. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61 788–792CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mundt, JO 1986 Lactic acid streptococci. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Vol. 2, pp. 1065–1068 (Eds Sneath, PHA, Mair, NS, Sharpe, ME & Holt, JG). Baltimore, USA: Williams and WilkinsGoogle Scholar
Netherwood, T, Bowden, R, Harrosin, P, O'Donnel, AG, Parker, DS & Gilbert, HJ 1999 Gene transfer in the gastrointestinal tract. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65 5139–5141CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nouaille, S, Ribeiro, LA, Myoshi, A, Pontes, D, Le Loir, Y, Oliveira, SC, Langella, P & Azevedo, V 2003 Heterologous protein production and delivery systems for Lactococcus lactis. Genetics and Molecular Research 2 102–111Google ScholarPubMed
Olsson-Liljequist, B, Larsson, P, Walder, M & Miorner, H 1997 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in Sweden. III. Methodology for susceptibility testing. Scand. Journal of Infectious Diseases Supplement 105 13–23Google Scholar
Orberg, PK & Sandine, WE 1985 Survey of antimicrobial resistance in lactic streptococci. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 49 538–542CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perreten, V, Schwarz, F, Cresta, L, Boeglin, M, Dasen, G & Teuber, M 1997 Antibiotic resistance spread in food. Nature 389 801–802CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perreten, V, Schwarz, FV, Teuber, M & Levy, SB 2001 Mdt(A), a new efflux protein conferring multiple antibiotic resistance in Lactococcus lactis and Escherichia coli. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotheraphy 45 1109–1114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pu, ZY, Dobos, M, Liwsowtin, GK & Pobell, IB 2002 Integrated polymerase chain reaction-based procedures for the detection and identification of species and subspecies of the Gram-positive bacterial genus Lactococcus. Journal of Applied Microbiology 93 353–361CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putman, M, van Veen, HW, Degener, JE & Konings, WN 2001 The lactococcal secondary multidrug transporter LmrP confers resistance to lincosamides, macrolides, streptogramins and tetracyclines. Microbiology 147 2873–2880CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raha, AR, Ross, E, Yusoff, K, Manap, MY & Ideris, A 2002 Characterisation and molecular cloning of an erythromycin resistance plasmid of Lactococcus lactis isolated from chicken cecum. Journal of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics 6 7–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinbold, GW & Reddy, MS 1974 Sensitivity or resistance of dairy starter and associated microorganisms to selected antibiotics. Journal of Milk and Food Technology 37 517–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringo, E 2004 Lactic acid bacteria in fish and fish farming. In Lactic Acid Bacteria. Microbiological and Functional Aspects, pp. 581–610 (Eds Salminen, S, von Wright, A & Ouwehand, A). New York, USA: Marcel Decker Inc.Google Scholar
Salama, MS, Musafa-Jeknic, T, Sandine, WE & Giovannioni, SJ 1995 An ecological study of lactic acid bacteria: isolation of new strains of Lactococcus including Lactococcus lactis subspecies cremoris. Journal of Dairy Science 78 1004–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, G, Smit, BA & Engels, WJM 2005 Flavour formation by lactic acid bacteria and biochemical flavours profiling of cheese products. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 29 591–610CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Su, YA, He, P & Clewell, DB 1992 Characterization of the tet(M) determinant of Tn916: evidence for regulation by transcription attenuation. Antimicrobials Agents and Chemotheraphy 36 769–778CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teuber, M, Meile, L & Schwarz, F 1999 Acquired antibiotic resistance in lactic acid bacteria from food. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 76 115–137CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, JPW, Downer, HL & Eardly, BD 1991 Phylogeny of the prototrophic Rhizobium strain BTAil by polymerase chain reaction-based sequencing of a 16S rRNA segment. Journal of Bacteriology 173 2271–2277CrossRefGoogle Scholar