Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:32:24.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

321 The Use of AI in Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease: How Far Have We Come?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2024

Alyssia Venna
Affiliation:
Children’s National Hospital
Rittal Mehta
Affiliation:
Children’s National Hospital
Justus Reitz
Affiliation:
Children’s National Hospital
Jessica Briscoe
Affiliation:
Children’s National Hospital
Yves d'Udekem
Affiliation:
Children’s National Hospital
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is gaining popularity in a variety of disciplines. While clinical applications for AI have increased in recent years, the use of AI in pediatric congenital heart disease (CHD) is limited. The goal of this systematic review was to assess how AI is currently used in this patient population and to describe knowledge gaps. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A systematic search was performed up to July 2023 using PubMed and Scopus databases and revealed 814 articles. Upon initial screening, 161 duplicates, 76 non-AI articles, and an additional 318 irrelevant articles were removed. A total of 259 full-text articles were reviewed for relevance. Articles that did not include a retrospective or prospective review of human subject data were excluded. Articles that had only results in the adult, prenatal, or non-CHD population were excluded. The remaining 68 articles were included in this review. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Of the 68 articles in this review, 19 were performed within cardiac surgery, 41 were within cardiology, and the remaining 8 included articles were combined cardiac surgery and cardiology. Upon initial review, 24 used AI for diagnostic purposes, 40 for predicting survival or adverse outcomes, 2 for developing training tools, and 2 for surveillance of CHD trends. We anticipate that upon further review of these 68 articles, there will be a wide variety in the types of AI models that were used. The results will reveal a multitude of challenges and limitations that future studies will need to further address. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: While technical innovations in pediatric CHD have dramatically improved survival rates, we have hit a plateau in improving the complications of these patients. AI has created an opportunity to build new diagnostic, predictive, teaching, and surveillance tools for advancing CHD care, but it seems we still have a long way to go.

Type
Informatics and Data Science
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. The Association for Clinical and Translational Science