Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:27:58.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two-year-olds but not younger children comprehend it in ambiguous contexts: Evidence from preferential looking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2016

BARBORA SKARABELA  and
MITSUHIKO OTA
BARBORA SKARABELA*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh, UK
MITSUHIKO OTA
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Barbora Skarabela, University of Edinburgh – Linguistics and English Language, Dugald Stewart Building, 3 Charles Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AD, United Kingdom. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Children use pronouns in their speech from the earliest word combinations. Yet, it is not clear from these early utterances whether they understand that pronouns are used as substitutes for nouns and entities in the discourse. The aim of this study was to examine whether young children understand the anaphoric function of pronouns, focusing on the interpretation of the pronoun it in English-speaking children at 1;6 and 2;0. We tested whether adults and children would prefer to look at a previously introduced vs. novel visual object depending on the argument form (it, the + noun, a + noun, or silence). Results demonstrate that, like adults, two-year-olds understand that it refers to a previously introduced referent. There is no evidence that this knowledge is established in children at 1;6. This suggests that some time between 1;6 and 2;0 children come to understand that it refers to a highly accessible referent introduced in the prior context.

Type
Brief Research Reports
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 255 - 268
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, S., Hughes, M. & Skarabela, B. (2015). The role of cognitive accessibility in children's referential choice. In Serratrice, L. & Allen, S. E. M. (eds), The acquisition of reference (pp. 123–153). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Angiolillo, C. J. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1982). Experimental evidence for agent–patient categories in child language. Journal of Child Language 9, 627–43.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. E. (2010). How speakers refer: the role of accessibility. Language and Linguistic Compass 4, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, H. (1979). Early lexical development: comprehension and production. Journal of Child Language 6, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergmann, C., Paulus, M. & Fikkert, P. (2012). Preschoolers’ comprehension of pronouns and reflexives: the impact of the task. Journal of Child Language 39 777–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, P. (1990). Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 21, 491–504.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Oxford: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Budwig, N. (1999). Language and the construction of self. In Budwig, N., Užgiris, I. & Wertsch, J. (eds), Communication: an arena of development (pp. 195–214). Stamford, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. L., Brooks, P. & Tomasello, M. (2000). Factors affecting young children's use of pronouns as referring expressions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 43, 1337–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiat, S. (1986). Personal pronouns. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (eds), Language acquisition (pp. 339–355). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chondrogianni, V. (2015). Production and comprehension of pronouns and reflexives in atypical populations. In Serratrice, L. & Allen, S. E. M. (eds), The acquisition of reference (pp. 285–309). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Clancy, P. M. (1997). Discourse motivations for referential choice in Korean acquisition. In Sohn, H.-M. & Haig, J. (eds), Japanese/Korean linguistics VI (pp. 639–659). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (2003). First language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dale, P. & Fenson, L. (1996). Lexical development norms for young children. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 28, 125–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demir, Ö., So, W. C., Özyürek, A. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2012). Turkish- and English-speaking children display sensitivity to perceptual context in the referring expressions they produce in speech and gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes 27, 844–67.Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Zangl, R., Portillo, A. L. & Marchman, V. A. (2008). Looking while listening: using eye movements to monitor spoken language. In Sekerina, I. A., Fernández, E. M. & Clahsen, H. (eds), Developmental psycholinguistics: on-line methods in children's language processing (pp. 113–132). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gerken, L. (1991). The metrical basis for children's subjectless sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 30, 431–51.Google Scholar
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N. & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69, 274–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, P. & Koster, C. (2010). Production/comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition. Lingua 120, 1887–97.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. (2013). Language development. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google ScholarPubMed
Huang, C. (2011). Referential choice in Mandarin child language: a discourse–pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 2057–80.Google Scholar
Hughes, M. E. & Allen, S. E. M. (2013). The effect of individual discourse–pragmatic features on referential choice in child English. Journal of Pragmatics 56, 15–30.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J. (1974). The origins of language comprehension. In Solso, R. L. (ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology: the Loyola Symposium (pp. 331–368). Potomac: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1981). A functional approach to child language: a study of determiners and reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirby, S. & Becker, M. (2007). Which it is it? The acquisition of referential and expletive it . Journal of Child Language 34, 571–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D., Lieven, E. V. M., Theakston, A. & Tomasello, M. (2006). The effect of perceptual availability and prior discourse on young children's use of referring expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics 27, 403–22.Google Scholar
Rozendaal, M. I. & Baker, A. E. (2008). A cross-linguistic investigation of the acquisition of the pragmatics of indefinite and definite reference in two-year-olds. Journal of Child Language 35, 773–807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rozendaal, M. I. & Baker, A. E. (2010). The acquisition of reference: pragmatic aspects and the influence of language input. Journal of Pragmatics 42, 1866–79.Google Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A., Marcos, H., Morgenstern, A., Hassan, R., Leber-Marin, J. & Parès, J. (2010). Dialogical beginnings of anaphora: the use of third person pronouns before the age of 3. Journal of Pragmatics 42, 1842–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A. & Morgenstern, A. (2015). Acquisition and use of pronouns in a dialogic perspective. In Serratrice, L. & Allen, S. E. M. (eds), The acquisition of reference (pp. 155–180). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sekerina, I. A. (2015). Online evidence for children's interpretation of personal pronouns. In Serratrice, L. & Allen, S. E. M. (eds), The acquisition of reference (pp. 213–239). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Serratrice, L. (2005). The role of discourse pragmatics in the acquisition of subjects in Italian. Applied Psycholinguistics 26, 437–62.Google Scholar
Skarabela, B. (2007). Signs of early social cognition in children's syntax: the case of joint attention in argument realization in child Inuktitut. Lingua 117, 1837–57.Google Scholar
Skarabela, B., Allen, S. E. M. & Scott-Phillips, T. C. (2013). Joint attention helps explain why children omit new referents. Journal of Pragmatics 56, 5–14.Google Scholar
Song, H. & Fisher, C. (2005). Who's ‘she’? Discourse structure influences preschoolers’ pronoun interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language 52, 29–57.Google Scholar
Song, H. & Fisher, C. (2007). Discourse prominence effects on 2·5-year-old children's interpretation of pronouns. Lingua 117, 1959–87.Google Scholar
Wittek, A. & Tomasello, M. (2005). Young children's sensitivity to listener knowledge and perceptual context in choosing referring expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics 26, 541–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar