Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T18:59:08.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glucksberg S. & Danks J. H., Experimental psycholinguistics: an introduction. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1975. Pp. xiii + 233.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

George Balfour
George Balfour
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 1976 , pp. 291 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bever, T. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, J. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. JChLang 2. 1–19.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. N. & Wales, R. (1970). The study of language acquisition. In Lyons, J. (ed.), New horizons in linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1970). Word associations and linguistic theory. In Lyons, J. (ed.), New horizons in linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Cooper, D. E. (1975). Knowledge of language. London: Prism Press.Google Scholar
Cromer, R. F. (1974). The development of language and cognition: the cognition hypothesis. In Foss, B. (ed.), New perspectives in child development. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Derwing, B. L. (1973). Transformational grammar as a theory of language acquisition. London: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A., Bever, T. G. & Garrett, M. F. (1974). The psychology of language. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Ingram, E. (1971). Requirements of model users. In Huxley, R. & Ingram, E. (eds), Language acquisition: models and methods. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1975). Scientific perspectives and philosophical dead ends in modern linguistics. Cognition 3. 377–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarrigle, J. & Donaldson, M. (1975). Conservation accidents. Cognition 3, 341–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macnamara, J. (1972). Cognitive basis of language learning in infants. PsychRev 79. 1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
McNeill, D. (1970). The acquisition of language. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1974). Semiotic extension. Paper given at the Loyola Symposium.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1975). The place of grammar in a theory of performance. Paper given at NYAS Symposium on Developmental Psycholinguistics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabbitt, P. (1975). Review of Annual Review of Psychology Vol 25. QJExpPsychol 27. 518–20.Google Scholar
Robinson, I. (1975). The new grammarians' funeral. London: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Seuren, P. A. M. (1969). Review of A. Koutsoudas, Writing transformational grammars. JLing 5. 188–9Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1974). Conversations with a two month old. New Scientist, 2 May.Google Scholar