Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:18:21.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Examining relationships between input and language development: some statistical issues*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Richard G. Schwartz  and
Stephen Camarata
Richard G. Schwartz
Affiliation:
Purdue University
Stephen Camarata
Affiliation:
Purdue University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

With various descriptions of adults' speech to children in hand, investigators have turned their attention to questions concerning the specific nature and extent of relationships between aspects of input and language development. Answering such questions requires some conceptualization of the potential relationships that may exist. Equally important, though, are the statistical and design issues surrounding the inference of these relationships. An exhaustive discussion of these issues is beyond the scope of this Note. Consequently, we will focus on three specific topics: (1) the use of gain scores; (2) aspects of correlation and alternative procedures that have an impact on the validity and interpretability of statistical findings; and (3) passive observation versus experimental manipulation.

Type
Notes and discussion
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 199 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnes, S., Gutfreund, M., Satterly, D. & Wells, G. (1983). Characteristics of adult speech which predict children's language development. JChLang 10. 65–84.Google ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cook, T. & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Cross, T. (1981). Parental speech as primary linguistic data–some complexities in the study of the effect of the input in language acquisition. In Dale, P. & Ingram, D. (eds), Child language: an international perspective. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Delia Corte, M., Benedict, H. & Klein, D. (1983). The relationship of pragmatic dimensions of mothers' speech to the referential-expressive distinction. JChLang 10. 35–43.Google Scholar
Fletcher, P. (1983). From sound to syntax: a learner's guide. Paper presented to the Fourth Annual Wisconsin Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders,Madison.Google Scholar
Furrow, D., Nelson, K. & Benedict, H. (1979). Mothers' speech to children and syntactic development: some simple relationships. JChLang 6. 423–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Gleitman, L., Newport, E. & Gleitman, H. (1984). The current status of the motherese hypothesis. JChLang 11. 43–79.Google Scholar
Hoff-Ginsburg, E. & Shatz, M. (1982). Linguistic input and the child's acquisition of language. PsychBull 92. 3–26.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monogr.Soc.Res.Ch.Devel. 38.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. E. (1977). Facilitating children's syntax acquisition. DevPsychol 13. 101–7.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. E. & Nelson, K. (1978). Cognitive pendulums and their linguistic realization. In Nelson, K. E. (ed.), Children's language, Vol. 1. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Newport, E., Gleitman, H. & Gleitman, L. (1977). Mother, I'd rather do it myself: some effects and noneffects of maternal speech style. In Snow, C. & Ferguson, C. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
O'Connor, E. F. (1972). Extending classical test theory to the measurement of change. RevEducRes 42. 73–97.Google Scholar
Ryan, T. (1959). Multiple comparisons in psychological research. PsychBull 56. 73–97.Google Scholar
Schwartz, R. G. & Terrell, B. Y. (1983). The role of input frequency in lexical acquisition. JChLang 10. 57–64.Google Scholar