Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:03:41.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Keynesian Eugenics and the Goodness of the World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2016

David Roth Singerman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article shows how John Maynard Keynes's lifelong commitment to eugenics was deeply embedded in his political, economic, and philosophical work. At the turn of the century, eugenics seemed poised to grant industrial nations unprecedented control over their own future, but that potential depended on contested understandings of the biological mechanisms of inheritance. Early in his career, Keynes helped William Bateson, Britain's chief proponent of Mendelian genetics, analyze problems in human heredity. Simultaneously, Keynes publicly opposed the efforts by Francis Galton and Karl Pearson to study inheritance through statistical biometry. For Keynes, this conflict was morally laden: Mendelism incorporated the only ethical theory of uncertainty, while biometry rested on false and dangerous concepts. This early study of heredity shaped Keynes's visions of industrial democracy after 1918. Liberals looked for a system of societal and economic management to engineer an escape from the postwar Malthusian trap. Britain's economic plight, Keynes argued, was rooted in the hereditary weaknesses of its leadership. Successful technocratic liberalism would depend on control over the quality as well as quantity of human beings. Ultimately, in his essay “Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren,” Keynes predicted that effective eugenic management would bring about capitalism's end.

Keywords

John Maynard KeyneseugenicsgeneticsbiometrystatisticsprobabilityWilliam BatesonKarl Pearson“Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren”liberalismpopulation
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , July 2016 , pp. 538 - 565
Copyright
Copyright © The North American Conference on British Studies 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Justin Fox, “The Comeback Keynes,” Time, 23 October 2008; Robert Skidelsky, Keynes: The Return of the Master (New York, 2009); Richard Posner, “How I Became a Keynesian,” New Republic, 23 September 2009.

2 John Maynard Keynes, “Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren,” in Essays in Persuasion (New York, 1963), 358−73, at 364.

3 See, for example, Mike Beggs, “Keynes’ Jetpack,” The Jacobin, April 2012; Robert Solow, “Whose Grandchildren?,” in Revisiting Keynes: Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren, ed. Lorenzo Pecchi and Gustavo Piga (Cambridge, MA, 2008), 88−93.

4 Manu Saadia, Trekonomics (San Francisco, 2016).

5 Keynes, “Economic Possibilities,” 368.

6 Ibid., 369.

7 “Address to the Eugenics Society, 14 February 1946,” JMK/30/PS/7/530, in the Papers of John Maynard Keynes, King's College Archive Centre, Cambridge (hereafter KCAC). He also delivered the Society's Galton Lecture in 1937; see Keynes, John Maynard, “Some Economic Consequences of a Declining Population,” Eugenics Review 29, no. 1 (April 1937): 13−17Google Scholar. For his service as treasurer, see “Announcement of the Formation of the Society and the First Public Meeting,” in Cambridge University Eugenics Society: Papers Read, SA/EUG/E.23:Box AMS/MF/147, Wellcome Library (hereafter WL). See also Joan Fisher Box, R. A. Fisher: The Life of a Scientist (New York, 1978), 26−27. For Keynes's attendance, see his date books, April 1911 through March 1914, JMK/67/PP/41, KCAC. Unpublished writings of J. M. Keynes, copyright The Provost and Scholars of King's College (Cambridge, 2016).

8 See, for example, Brendan O'Neill, “It Wasn't Keynes's Homosexuality that Made Him Cavalier about Future Generations—It Was His Eugenicism,” Daily Telegraph (blog), 8 May 2013, http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/brendanoneill2/100215768/it-wasnt-keynes-homosexuality-that-made-him-cavalier-about-future-generations-it-was-his-eugenicism/, accessed 5 February 2016; John Aziz, “Keynesianism & Eugenics,” Zero Hedge (blog), 25 May 2012, http://www.zerohedge.com/news/guest-post-keynesianism-eugenics, accessed 5 February 2016.

9 Daniel Kevles, In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity (Berkeley, 1985), 60; Freeden, Michael, “Eugenics and Progressive Thought: A Study in Ideological Affinity,” Historical Journal 22, no. 3 (September 1979): 645–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar, especially 663, 671; Pauline M. H. Mazumdar, Eugenics, Human Genetics and Human Failings: The Eugenics Society, its Sources and its Critics in Britain (London, 1992), 50, 53.

10 Paul, Diane, “Eugenics and the Left,” Journal of the History of Ideas 45, no. 4 (December 1984): 567–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Freeden, “Eugenics and Progressive Thought.”

11 Bradley W. Hart, “British, German, and American Eugenicists in Transnational Context, c. 1900−1939” (PhD diss., University of Cambridge, 2011); Hall, Lesley A., “Eugenics, Sex and the State: Some Introductory Remarks,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39, no. 2 (June 2008): 177−80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Spencer, Hamish G. and Paul, Diane B., “The Failure of a Scientific Critique: David Heron, Karl Pearson and Mendelian Eugenics,” British Journal for the History of Science 31, no. 4 (December 1998): 441−52CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For an analysis of the failure of British eugenicists to legislate sterilization, see Hart, Bradley W. and Carr, Richard, “Sterilization and the British Conservative Party: Rethinking the Failure of the Eugenic Society's Political Strategy in the 1930s,” Historical Research 88, no. 242 (November 2015): 716−39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 John Toye, Keynes on Population (Oxford, 2000), 153; John Laurent, “Keynes and Darwinism,” in Darwinism and Evolutionary Economics, ed. John Laurent and John Nightingale (Cheltenham, 2001), 66−69.

13 Richmond, Marsha, “The 1909 Darwin Celebration: Reexamining Evolution in the Light of Mendel, Mutation, and Meiosis,” Isis 97, no. 3 (September 2006): 447−84, at 453−59CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Keynes attended part of the event; see the dinner seating chart at MS 57: “Centenary of the Birth of Charles Darwin, and the Fiftieth Anniversary of the Publication of the Origin of Species, to be celebrated at Cambridge, 22, 23, and 24 June 1909,” in the Old Library, Christ's College, Cambridge, and Keynes's diaries, JMK/67/PP/41, KCAC.

14 John Maynard Keynes to Duncan Grant, 8 July 1909, BL Add. MSS 57930 B, no. 4.

15 Keynes to Grant, 18 July 1909, BL Add. MSS 57930 B, no. 14.

16 Peterson, Erik L., “William Bateson from Balanoglossus to Materials for the Study of Variation: The Transatlantic Roots of Discontinuity and the (Un)naturalness of Selection,” Journal of the History of Biology 41, no. 2 (Summer 2008): 267−305CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 William Bateson to Adam Sedgwick, April 1905, in William Bateson and Beatrice Bateson, William Bateson, F.R.S., Naturalist: His Essays and Addresses together with a Short Account of His Life (Cambridge, 1928), 93; Donald L. Opitz, “Cultivating Genetics in the Country: Whittingehame Lodge, Cambridge,” in Geographies of Nineteenth-Century Knowledge, ed. David N. Livingstone and Charles W. J. Withers (Chicago, 2011), 82.

18 Janet Shepherd, s. v., “Bateson, William Henry (1812–1881),” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/1685, accessed 27 February 2016; Phyllis Deane, s. v., “Keynes, (John) Neville (1852–1949),” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/39170, accessed 27 February 2016; Alan Cock and Donald Forsdyke, Treasure Your Exceptions: The Science and Life of William Bateson (New York, 2008), 13, 187−88; Opitz, “Cultivating Genetics,” 80; Geoffrey Keynes, The Gates of Memory: No Life is Long Enough (Oxford, 1981), 82−83.

19 Peter Groenewegen, A Soaring Eagle: Alfred Marshall, 1842−1924 (Aldershot, 1995), 482−84.

20 Opitz, “Cultivating Genetics,” 82.

21 Keynes, Gates of Memory, 82; Marshall to Bateson, 24 October 1908, in 1/272, Marshall Papers, Marshall Library of Economics, Cambridge.

22 William Bateson, Mendel's Principles of Heredity (Cambridge, 1909), 54, 76.

23 Bateson, Bateson, Naturalist, 327−31.

24 Rushton, Alan, “Nettleship, Pearson and Bateson: The Biometric-Mendelian Debate in a Medical Context,” Journal for the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 55, no. 2 (April 2000): 134−57CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 141−51.

25 Bateson, Bateson, Naturalist, 331, and Mendel's Principles, 172, 231.

26 Bateson, Mendel's Principles, 1909 2nd ed., note facing 230.

27 Bateson, Bateson, Naturalist, 328, 353.

28 “Report of the Committee on Colour-Vision,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 51, nos. 308−314 (January 1892): 280−396, at 281−82; Henrika Kuklick, The Savage Within: The Social History of British Anthropology, 1885−1945 (Cambridge, 1991), 144−48.

29 Bailkin, Jordanna, “Color Problems: Work, Pathology, and Perception in Modern Britain,” International Labor and Working-Class History, no. 68 (Fall 2005): 93−111Google Scholar.

30 Rayleigh, Lord et al. , letters on “Civilisation and Eyesight,” Nature 31 (November 1884−May 1885): 340, 359–60Google Scholar, 386–87, 407–8, 433–34, 457–58, 503–4, 552–53.

31 Rivers, W. H. R., “Primitive Color Vision,” Popular Science Monthly 59 (May 1901): 44−58, at 55Google Scholar.

32 “Announcement of the Formation of the Society and the First Public Meeting,” in Cambridge University Eugenics Society: Papers Read, WL.

33 Rivers, “Primitive Color Vision,” 52.

34 Bateson discussed Rivers's work with Nettleship and others, and used his data; see Bateson, Mendel's Principles, 223.

35 See the Cambridge zoologist Leonard Doncaster's address to the University's Eugenics Society, Cambridge Magazine, 24 February 1912, in Cambridge University Eugenics Society: Papers Read, WL.

36 Bailkin, “Color Problems,” 97−98.

37 Bateson to Keynes, 28 October 1909, JMK/67/PP/45/22/3, KCAC.

38 Keynes to Bateson, 30 October 1909, document no. 3137, William Bateson Collection, John Innes Archive, Norwich (hereafter WBC).

39 Robert Skidelsky, John Maynard Keynes: Hopes Betrayed, 1881−1920 (London, 1992), 175.

40 John Maynard Keynes, “Principles of Probability” (1907), JMK/TP/A/1, 1, KCAC.

41 Ibid., 11.

42 Ibid., 7−11.

43 For the pedigree as a visual tool, see Mazumdar, Eugenics, Human Genetics, and Human Failings, 62.

44 Bateson to Keynes, 1 November 1909, JMK/PP/45/22/5, KCAC; Keynes to Bateson, 5 November 1909; JIC document no. 3138; Bateson to Keynes, 10 November 1909, JMK/PP/45/22/7.

45 Magnello, M. Eileen, “The Non-Correlation of Biometrics and Eugenics: Rival Forms of Laboratory Work in Karl Pearson's Career at University College London, Part 1,” History of Science 37, no. 1 (March 1999): 79−106CrossRefGoogle Scholar; eadem, “The Non-Correlation of Biometrics and Eugenics: Rival Forms of Laboratory Work in Karl Pearson's Career at University College London, Part 2,” History of Science 37, no. 2 (June 1999): 123–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Karl Pearson, The Scope and Importance to the State of the Science of National Eugenics (London, 1911), 45; for Bateson, see, for example, his 1914 presidential address to the British Association, where he said that “union [between] social vermin we should no more permit than we would allow parasites to breed on our own bodies,” in Bateson, Bateson, Naturalist, 306.

47 Bateson, Mendel's Principles, 6−7, 55, 131.

48 Karl Pearson, in The Influence of Heredity on Disease, with Special Reference to Tuberculosis, Cancer and Diseases of the Nervous System: A Discussion, ed. John Nachbar (London, 1909): 54−60, at 56−57.

49 Kevles, In the Name of Eugenics, 43; Theodore Porter, Karl Pearson: The Scientific Life in a Statistical Age (Princeton, 2004), 269.

50 Pearson, Karl, Yule, G. U., Blanchard, Norman, and Lee, Alice, “The Law of Ancestral Heredity,” Biometrika 2, no. 2 (February 1902): 211−36, at 215CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Galton, Francis, “Biometry,” Biometrika 1, no. 1 (October 1901): 7−10CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Magnello, M. Eileen “Karl Pearson's Mathematization of Inheritance: From Ancestral Heredity to Mendelian Genetics (1895−1909),” Annals of Science 55, no. 1 (January 1998): 35−94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Francis Galton, Probability, the Foundation of Eugenics: The Herbert Spencer Lecture Delivered on June 5, 1907 (Oxford, 1907), 26−29. Keynes read this essay shortly after its publication; see Bibliography for “Principles of Probability” (1907), JMK/TP/A/3, KCAC.

53 Elderton, William Palin, “Review: Probability, the Foundation of Eugenics,” Biometrika 5, no. 4 (June 1907): 477Google Scholar.

54 Cambridge Daily News, Cambridge, England, 12 June 1911.

55 R. A. Fisher, “Evolution and Society,” in Cambridge University Eugenics Society: Papers Read, WL.

56 Skidelsky, Hopes Betrayed, 133. For the “intellectual aristocracy” as a whole, see Noel G. Annan, “The Intellectual Aristocracy,” in Studies in Social History: A Tribute to G. M. Trevelyan, ed. J. H. Plumb (London, 1955), 263.

57 Tom Baldwin, “Keynes and Ethics,” in The Cambridge Companion to Keynes, ed. Roger Backhouse and Bradley Bateman (Cambridge, 2006), 238−40; Skidelsky, Hopes Betrayed, chap. 6.

58 G. E. Moore, Principia Ethica (1903; repr., Cambridge, 1954), 142.

59 Skidelsky, Hopes Betrayed, 140−43.

60 Moore, Principia Ethica, 21, 148−71.

61 Francis Macdonald Cornford, Microcosmographia Academica: Being a Guide for the Young Academic Politician, 6th ed. (London, 1964), chap. 7.

62 “Notes of Books Read on Probability,” JMK/TP/D/908−10, KCAC.

63 “Ethics in Relation to Conduct,” JMK/UA/19/2, KCAC.

64 Keynes, “Principles” (1907), 16−18.

65 Examiner's Report of Alfred Whitehead, 1908, JMK/TP/4/2, KCAC.

66 Skidelsky, Hopes Betrayed, 182; John Maynard Keynes, “Principles of Probability” (1908), i, JMK/MM/6, KCAC.

67 Keynes, “Principles” (1908), 112−115.

68 Ibid., 118 (emphasis in the original).

69 Ibid., 119, 122 (emphasis in the original).

70 Examiner's Report of Alfred Whitehead (1909), JMK/TP/4/8, KCAC.

71 Keynes, “Principles” (1908), iii, 125.

72 Scholars have debated the source of Keynes's vehemence, but none have linked it to his work with Bateson. See Skidelsky, Hopes Betrayed, 226; Schumpeter, Joseph, “John Maynard Keynes 1883−1946,” American Economic Review 36, no. 4 (September 1946): 495−518Google Scholar, at 496; Rod O'Donnell, Keynes: Philosophy, Economics, and Politics: The Philosophical Foundations of Keynes's Thought and Their Influence on His Economics and Politics (New York, 1989), chap. 9. O'Donnell does suggest that his conflict with Pearson was linked to eugenics, as does Reba N. Soffer, in Ethics and Society in England: The Revolution in the Social Sciences, 1870−1914 (Berkeley, 1978).

73 Stephen Stigler, Statistics on the Table: The History of Statistical Concepts and Methods (Cambridge, MA, 1999), 15.

74 Ethel Elderton and Karl Pearson, A First Study of the Influence of Parental Alcoholism on the Physique and Ability of the Offspring (London, 1910), 32.

75 Stigler, Statistics on the Table, 30.

76 Keynes, “Principles” (1908), 251−52.

77 Keynes, John Maynard, “Correspondence,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 74, no. 1 (December 1910): 114−21, at 121Google Scholar.

78 Statement Exhibiting the Moral and Material Progress and Condition of India during the Year 1906−07 (London, 1908), 17−19; John Maynard Keynes to Sir T. Holderness, 9 February 1908, in The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. 15, Activities 1906−1914: India and Cambridge, ed. Elizabeth Johnson (London, 1981), 11−12.

79 Keynes, Review of 1907−1908 Report, in Collected Writings, 15:35−36.

80 Keynes, “Correspondence,” 121.

81 Keynes to Bateson, 9 November 1910, document no. 3142, WBC; Bateson to Keynes, 10 December 1910, JMK/CO/6, KCAC (emphasis in the original).

82 Leonard T. Hobhouse, “The Value and Limitations of Eugenics,” in Social Evolution and Political Theory (New York, 1911), 42.

83 Skidelsky, Hopes Betrayed, 57, 3.

84 Toye, Keynes on Population, chap. 3.

85 Ibid., 60, 66, 68.

86 Ibid., 71.

87 Skidelsky, Hopes Betrayed, chap. 16. Bateson's letter is at JMK/EC/2/1, KCAC.

88 Keynes, “Some Economic Consequences of a Declining Population.”

89 Toye, Keynes on Population, 227.

90 Keynes to Lydia Lopokova, 28 October and 2 November 1923, JMK/PP/45/190/1/28 and /30, KCAC. For their attempts to conceive (contra Niall Ferguson) see Robert Skidelsky, John Maynard Keynes: The Economist as Saviour (London, 1992), 295.

91 Skidelsky, Economist as Saviour, 3; John Maynard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace (New York, 1920), 39−42.

92 Keynes, Economic Consequences, chap. 2.

93 Ibid., 228.

94 Ibid., 15; Robert Skidelsky, John Maynard Keynes: The Economist as Saviour (London, 1992), 38, 130.

95 John Maynard Keynes, The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. 19, Activities 1922−1929: The Return to Gold and Industrial Policy, Part 1, ed. Donald Moggridge (London, 1981), 79.

96 Toye, Keynes on Population, 63.

97 Skidelsky, Economist as Saviour, chap. 7; Keynes, “Am I a Liberal?,” in Essays in Persuasion, 323−38, at 335.

98 Keynes, “Am I a Liberal?,” 337; Skidelsky, Economist as Saviour, 130; Michael Freeden, Liberalism Divided: A Study in British Political Thought, 1914−1939 (New York, 1986), chap. 4.

99 Keynes, Collected Writings, 19:423.

100 Keynes, “The End of Laissez-faire,” in Essays in Persuasion, 312−22, at 317, 319 (emphasis in the original).

101 “Essays on the Economic Future of the World,” JMK/A/2/9, KCAC. The manuscript is undated, but O'Donnell places it in the early part of the decade. O'Donnell, Rod, “Unwritten Books and Papers of John Maynard Keynes,” History of Political Economy 24, no. 4 (Winter 1992): 767−817, at 779CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

102 I am grateful to Ani Ravi for his help with this identification and translation.

103 Aristotle, Politics, trans. Benjamin Jowett (New York, 1942), 5.

104 Skidelsky, Hopes Betrayed, 167.

105 Tamson Pietsch, “‘Mending a Broken World’: The Universities and the Nation, 1918−36,” in Brave New World: Imperial and Democratic Nation-Building in Britain between the Wars, ed. Laura Beers and Geraint Thomas (London, 2011), 198−208.

106 Freeden, Liberalism Divided, 84, 101.

107 Quoted in Skidelsky, Economist as Saviour, 152.

108 Keynes, “The Economic Consequences of Mr. Churchill,” in Essays in Persuasion, 244−70, at 260−61.

109 Harold Wright, Population (London, 1923), 159.

110 Keynes, “Am I a Liberal?,” 327. See also his November 1900 prize essay at Eton, “The Character of the Stuarts: How Far Was it Responsible for Their Misfortunes?,” JMK/PP/31/3/10−11, KCAC.

111 Britain's Industrial Future, Being the Report of the Liberal Industrial Inquiry (London, 1928), 150.

112 Ibid.

113 Cambridge Daily News, Cambridge, England, 11 November 1911.

114 Britain's Industrial Future, 403.

115 Keynes, “Am I a Liberal?,” 330.

116 Wright, Population, 166.

117 Greenhalgh, Elizabeth, “David Lloyd George, Georges Clemenceau, and the 1918 Manpower Crisis,” Historical Journal 50, no. 2 (June 2007): 397−421, at 410CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Carr, Richard and Hart, Bradley W., “Old Etonians, Great War Demographics and the Interpretations of British Eugenics, c. 1914−1939,” First World War Studies 3, no. 2 (October 2012): 217−39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

118 Bateson, Bateson, Naturalist, 305.

119 Wright, Population, 167. See also Daniel Ussishkin, “The ‘Will to Work’: Industrial Management and the Question of Conduct in Inter-War Britain,” in Beers and Thomas, eds., Brave New World, 91−108.

120 Keynes, “Liberalism and Labour,” in Essays in Persuasion, 339−45.

121 Richard Overy, The Morbid Age: Britain Between the Wars (London, 2009), 93−99.

122 C. B. C. materials, JMK/SS/3, KCAC.

123 Matthew Connelly, Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population (Cambridge, MA, 2008), 64.

124 Margaret Sanger to Keynes, 14 February 1926, JMK/PP/45/281, KCAC.

125 World Population Conference pamphlet, JMK/OC/2/185, KCAC.

126 Connelly, Fatal Misconception, 69.

127 Toye, Keynes on Population, 187.

128 Connelly, Fatal Misconception, 18; Program for Malthusian League dinner, 26 July 1927, JMK/PS/3/117, KCAC.

129 Overy, Morbid Age, 94.

130 “Malthus in Piam Memoriam,” JMK/PS/3/113−14, KCAC.

131 Keynes, “Economic Possibilities,” 373.

132 Ibid., 367.

133 Robert Skidelsky, “Keynes: The Return of the Master,” talk delivered at Harvard University, 16 November 2009.

134 Keynes, “Economic Possibilities,” 368; “Am I a Liberal?,” 327.

135 Freeden, Liberalism Divided, 147−50.

136 Keynes, “Economic Possibilities,” 371−72.

137 Ibid., 372.