Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-5wl6q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-10T11:52:14.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In the Theater of Counterrevolution: Loyalist Association and Conservative Opinion in the 1790s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2013

Kevin Gilmartin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Conservative movements have generally played a negative role in accounts of the history of political expression in Britain during the period of the French Revolution. Where E. P. Thompson and others on the Left tended to identify radicalism with the disenfranchised and with a struggle for the rights of free expression and public assembly, conservative activists have been associated with state campaigns of political repression and legal interference. Indeed, conservatism in this period is typically conceived in negative terms, as antiradicalism or counterrevolution. If this has been the view of hostile commentators, it is consistent with a more sympathetic mythology that sees nothing novel about the conservative principles that emerged in late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century Britain. They represent an establishment response to alien challenges. Even where conservatives set about mobilizing the resources of print, opinion, and assembly in a constructive fashion, the reputation for interference has endured. John Reeves's Association for Preserving Liberty and Property against Republicans and Levellers is a useful case in point, since it managed in its brief but enterprising history to combine fierce anti-Jacobinism with the later eighteenth century's rising tide of voluntary civic activism. The association came together at the Crown and Anchor Tavern when a group of self-professed “private men” decided “to form ourselves into an Association” and announced their intentions through the major London newspapers in November and December of 1792. The original committee then called on others “to make similar exertions in their respective neighbourhoods,” forming energetic local associations that would be linked by regular correspondence with the central London committee. In this way, the loyalist movement grew with astonishing speed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 41 , Issue 3: New Directions in Political History , July 2002 , pp. 291 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, e.g., Thompson, E. P., The Making of the English Working Class (New York, 1966)Google Scholar; Goodwin, Albert, The Friends of Liberty: The English Democratic Movement in the Age of the French Revolution (Cambridge, Mass., 1979)Google Scholar; and Hone, J. Ann, For the Cause of Truth: Radicalism in London, 1796–1821 (Oxford, 1982)Google Scholar.

2 For the emergence of the modern conservative position in this period, see Sack, James J., From Jacobite to Conservative: Reaction and Orthodoxy in Britain, c. 1760–1832 (Cambridge, 1993)Google Scholar.

3 Association for Preserving Liberty and Property against Republicans and Levellers, Association Papers (London, 1793), pt. 1Google Scholar, Proceedings of the Association, no. 1, pp. 5, 10.

4 For estimates of the strength of the movement, see Mitchell, Austin, “The Association Movement of 1792–3,” Historical Journal 4 (1961): 61–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dozier, Robert R., For King, Constitution and Country: The English Loyalists and the French Revolution (Lexington, Ky., 1983), pp. 60–64Google Scholar; Dickinson, H. T., “Popular Loyalism in Britain in the 1790s,” in The Transformation of Political Culture: England and Germany in the Late Eighteenth Century, ed. Hellmuth, Eckhart (Oxford, 1990), pp. 517–20Google Scholar. For the London Association's own estimate, see Association Papers, preface, p. v.

5 Black, Eugene Charlton, The Association: British Extraparliamentary Political Organization, 1769–1793 (Cambridge, Mass., 1963), p. 261Google Scholar.

6 Central expressions of this defense of the conservative position can be found in Dickinson, H. T., Liberty and Property: Political Ideology in Eighteenth-Century Britain (London, 1979)Google Scholar; Christie, Ian R., Stress and Stability in Late Eighteenth-Century Britain: Reflections on the British Avoidance of Revolution (Oxford, 1984)Google Scholar; Dozier, For King, Constitution and Country; Dickinson, H. T., “Introduction: The Impact of the French Revolution and the French Wars, 1789–1815,” and “Popular Conservatism and Militant Loyalism, 1789–1815,” in Britain and the French Revolution, 1789–1815, ed. Dickinson, H. T. (London, 1989), pp. 1–19, 103–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; O'Gorman, Frank, “Pitt and the ‘Tory’ Reaction to the French Revolution, 1789–1815,” in Dickinson, , ed., Britain and the French Revolution, pp. 21–37Google Scholar; Dickinson, , “Popular Loyalism in Britain,” pp. 503–33Google Scholar.

7 Dickinson, , Liberty and Property, pp. 271–72Google Scholar.

8 O'Gorman, , “Pitt and the ‘Tory’ Reaction,” pp. 36–37Google Scholar; Dickinson, , Liberty and Property, p. 272Google Scholar.

9 Cookson, J. E., “The English Volunteer Movement of the French Wars, 1793–1815: Some Contexts,” Historical Journal 32 (1989): 868CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For other accounts of the traditions behind loyal association and its relative strength with respect to radicalism, see Dickinson, , “Introduction,” p. 10Google Scholar; Dozier, , For King, Constitution, and Country, pp. 176–77Google Scholar; Christie, , Stress and Stability, pp. 36–37Google Scholar; Black, The Association.

10 Dickinson, , “Popular Loyalism in Britain,” p. 517Google Scholar.

11 Dinwiddy, John, “Interpretations of Anti-Jacobinism,” in The French Revolution and British Popular Politics, ed. Philp, Mark (Cambridge, 1991), p. 41Google Scholar.

12 Ibid., p. 47.

13 Philp, Mark, “Vulgar Conservatism, 1792–3,” English Historical Review 110 (1995): 43–45, 68Google Scholar. For an influential account of the emergence of British national identity in this period, see Colley, Linda, Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707–1837 (New Haven, Conn., 1992).Google Scholar

14 See Philp, , “Vulgar Conservatism,” p. 45Google Scholar.

15 Beedell, A. V., “John Reeves's Prosecution for a Seditious Libel, 1795–6: A Study in Political Cynicism,” Historical Journal 36 (1993): 821–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Dickinson's wide-ranging discussion in “Popular Loyalism” underscores the difficulty. He draws together impressive evidence about the number of signatures gathered for loyalist resolutions in various towns to show that “the Association movement often reached beyond the propertied middle classes into the humbler ranks of society” (pp. 520–21) but later suggests with regard to loyalist intimidation that “perhaps most insidious of all were the efforts of several loyalist associations to pressurize every local householder into signing their addresses and resolutions” (p. 532–33). The early claim about the association's penetration of the lower ranks is not easy to challenge, but the questions remain: how far did this “reach” extend, and in what manner was it achieved?

16 The phrase appears in the subtitle of Christie, Stress and Stability, the published version of his 1983–84 Ford Lectures.

17 Dozier, , For King, Constitution, and Country, pp. 82–83Google Scholar.

18 Eastwood, David, “Patriotism and the English State in the 1790s,” in Philp, , ed., The French Revolution and British Popular Politics, pp. 149–50Google Scholar.

19 Thompson, , The Making of the English Working Class, p. 82Google Scholar; Dickinson, , “Popular Loyalism in Britain,” pp. 516–17Google Scholar.

20 Horne, Thomas A., “‘The Poor Have a Claim Founded in the Law of Nature’: William Paley and the Rights of the Poor,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (1985): 55, n. 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 For Paley's ambiguous political reputation, see Horne, , “‘The Poor Have a Claim Founded in the Law of Nature,’” pp. 54–55Google Scholar; Gascoigne, JohnCambridge in the Age of the Enlightenment: Science, Religion and Politics from the Restoration to the French Revolution (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 241–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar. In Stress and Stability, Christie reclaims the Principles as “a systematic exposition of the intellectual tradition” on which conservatives of the 1790s drew, but he concedes that Paley would have shared some ground with the reformers of the 1780s (pp. 159–64). See also Pocock, J. G. A., Virtue, Commerce, and History (Cambridge, 1985), p. 278CrossRefGoogle Scholar, where Paley is treated as a “liberal and conservative” philosopher.

22 See Hole, Robert, Pulpits, Politics and Public Order in England, 1760–1832 (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 79–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For evangelical criticisms of Paley, see Gascoigne, , Cambridge in the Age of the Enlightenment, pp. 243–44Google Scholar; Hilton, BoydThe Age of Atonement: The Influence of Evangelicalism on Social and Economic Thought, 1785–1865 (Oxford, 1988), pp. 3–5Google Scholar. For Coleridge, see Welch, Claude, “Samuel Taylor Coleridge,” in Nineteenth-Century Religious Thought in the West, ed. Smart, Ninianet al., 3 vols. (Cambridge, 1985), 2:3–4Google Scholar.

23 Paley, William, The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy (London, 1785), pp. 92–93Google Scholar.

24 See Horne, , “‘The Poor Have a Claim Founded in the Law of Nature,’” p. 60Google Scholar; Gascoigne, , Cambridge in the Age of the Enlightenment, pp. 242–43Google Scholar.

25 Association Papers, pt. 1, no. 6, pp. 1–10.

26 See Paley, William, Reasons for Contentment. Addressed to the Labouring Part of the British Public (Newcastle, 1819)Google Scholar, and Reasons for Contentment: Addressed to the Labouring Part of the British Public: Together with the Fable of the Bee Hive (London, 1831)Google Scholar.

27 See Black, , The Association, p. 267Google Scholar. The earliest edition of Reasons for Contentment that I have seen has the imprint “Carlisle, / Printed by F. Jollie.–1792. / Price Two-pence.”

28 See Hole, , Pulpits, Politics, and Public Order, p. 73Google Scholar.

29 See Marshall, David, The Figure of Theater: Shaftesbury, Defoe, Adam Smith, and George Eliot (New York, 1986)Google Scholar; Corrigan, Philip and Sayer, Derek, The Great Arch: English State Formation as Cultural Revolution (Oxford, 1985), p. 104Google Scholar.

30 Paley, William, Reasons for Contentment; Addressed to the Labouring Part of the British Public (London, 1793), pp. 3–4Google Scholar; all further references to Reasons for Contentment are to this edition and will be given in parentheses is the text.

31 Paulson, Ronald, “Life as Journey and as Theater: Two Eighteenth-Century Narrative Structures,” New Literary History 8 (1976): 52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Fielding, Henry, Tom Jones, ed. Bender, John and Stern, Simon (Oxford, 1996), pp. 284–85Google Scholar.

33 Wordsworth, William, Preface to Lyrical Ballads, in Selected Prose, ed. Hayden, John O. (Harmondsworth, 1988), p. 284Google Scholar; Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the Revolution in France, ed. Pocock, J. G. A. (Indianapolis, 1987), pp. 56–57Google Scholar.

34 In this sense, Paley's attitudes may derive from some of the social and cultural developments that tended to private closet rather than public stage and left the world as stage “a forgotten metaphor.” See Hunter, J. Paul, “The World as Stage and Closet,” in British Theatre and the Other Arts, 1660–1800, ed. Kenny, Shirley Strum (Washington, D.C., 1984), pp. 271–87Google Scholar.

35 Rieder, John, “Civic Virtue and Social Class at the Scene of Execution: Wordsworth's Salisbury Plain Poems,” Studies in Romanticism 30 (1991): 334CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 Hadley, Elaine, Melodramatic Tactics: Theatricalized Dissent in the English Marketplace, 1800–1885 (Stanford, Calif., 1995), pp. 34–38Google Scholar; Baer, Marc, Theatre and Disorder in Late Georgian London (Oxford, 1992), pp. 46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brewer, John, The Pleasures of the Imagination: English Culture in the Eighteenth Century (New York, 1997), pp. 351–56Google Scholar.

37 Smith, Adam, The Theory of Moral Sentiments (Indianapolis, 1984), p. 61Google Scholar. For the spectatorial framework of this consideration in Smith, see Marshall, , The Figure of Theater, pp. 187–88Google Scholar; and Justman, Stewart “Regarding Others,” New Literary History 27 (1996): 84–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Marshall, , The Figure of Theater, pp. 173–74Google Scholar.

39 For discussions of state spectacle and theater in this period, which have involved a good deal of disagreement about the precise nature and effect of public displays designed to secure popular loyalty, see Russell, Colley, Britons, pp. 195–236Google Scholar; Gillian, , The Theatres of War: Performance, Politics, and Society, 1793–1815 (Oxford, 1995)Google Scholar; and Jenks, Timothy, “Contesting the Hero: The Funeral of Admiral Lord Nelson,” Journal of British Studies 39 (2000): 422–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 Association Papers, pt. 2, no. 3, p. 10.

41 Marshall, , The Figure of Theater, p. 173Google Scholar.

42 Burke, , Reflections on the Revolution in France, p. 41Google Scholar.

43 See Mitchell, , “The Association Movement,” pp. 72–73Google Scholar, for an example of the printing and free distribution of Reasons for Contentment by the Manchester Association.

44 In this sense, the kind of political contentment promulgated by Paley and by the association movement more broadly, confirms Colley's point in Britons about national feeling in the period: “Active commitment to Great Britain was not, could not be a given. It had to be learnt; and men and women needed to see some advantage in learning it” (p. 295).

45 Association Papers, preface, p. iv. For the various government connections and positions of the committee members, see Mitchell, , “The Association Movement,” p. 59, and n. 17Google Scholar.

46 Black, , The Association, p. 237Google Scholar. Beedell, , “John Reeves's Prosecution,” p. 801Google Scholar; and Ginter, Donald E., “The Loyalist Association Movement of 1792–93 and British Public Opinion,” Historical Journal 9 (1996): 179CrossRefGoogle Scholar, also suggest a government role in the founding. See Eastwood, , “Patriotism and the English State,” pp. 154–55Google Scholar, for a review of the debate as well as an interesting suggestion that there may have been local government inspiration for the movement.

47 See Dickinson, , “Popular Loyalism in Britain,” pp. 516–18Google Scholar, and “Popular Conservatism and Militant Loyalism,” pp. 120–22; and Dozier, , For King, Constitution, and Country, pp. 55–60, 76–77Google Scholar.

48 Duffy, Michael, “William Pitt and the Origins of the Loyalist Association Movement of 1792,” Historical Journal 39 (1996): 947–48, 952–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar. My account in this and the following paragraph is indebted to Duffy's analysis. The tendency of the loyalist association movement to reflect the dynamics of radicalism has often been noticed. See, e.g., Mitchell, , “The Association Movement,” p. 58Google Scholar; Dickinson, , “Popular Loyalism in Britain,” p. 526Google Scholar; Black, , The Association, pp. 267–70Google Scholar. For government suspicion of clubs and associations, see Sack, , From Jacobite to Conservative, pp. 102–5Google Scholar.

49 Duffy, , “William Pitt and the Origins of the Loyalist Association Movement,” pp. 956–57Google Scholar.

50 Ibid., pp. 950–52, 954–55.

51 Association Papers, pt. 1, Proceedings of the Association, no. 1, pp. 7–8.

52 Ibid., p. 5.

53 Mitchell, , “The Association Movement,” pp. 64–67Google Scholar; Dickinson, , “Popular Loyalism in Britain,” pp. 519–20Google Scholar; Dozier, , For King, Constitution, and Country, pp. 77–79Google Scholar. For a satirical treatment of the formula for a typical association gathering, see Black, , The Association, pp. 256–57Google Scholar.

54 Association Papers, pt. 1, Proceedings of the Association, no. 1, p. 7.

55 Ibid., pp. 7–8.

56 Eagleton, Terry, The Function of Criticism: From the Spectator to Post-structuralism (London, 1984), p. 36Google Scholar. For an account of the notion of a counterpublic sphere in relation to the resurgent radicalism of the 1810s and 1820s, see Gilmartin, Kevin, Print Politics: The Press and Radical Opposition in Early Nineteenth-Century England (Cambridge, 1996), pp. 1–10Google Scholar.

57 Beedell, , “Reeves's Prosecution,” p. 804Google Scholar.

58 Dozier, , For King, Constitution, and Country, p. 78Google Scholar; Clark, J. C. DEnglish Society, 1688–1832 (Cambridge, 1985), p. 263Google Scholar; Eastwood, , “Patriotism and the English State,” p. 157Google Scholar.

59 Association Papers, pt. 1, Proceedings of the Association, no. 1, p. 8.

60 Ibid., pp. 7–8.

61 Ibid., preface, p. iii.

62 See Mitchell, , “The Association Movement,” pp. 74–77Google Scholar. For the development of the volunteer movement, which shares a number of key features with loyalist association, see Cookson, , “The English Volunteer Movement,” pp. 867–91Google Scholar; Western, J.R.“The Volunteer Movement as an Anti-revolutionary Force, 1793–1801” English Historical Review 71 (1956): 603–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Association Papers, pt. 1, Proceedings of the Association, no. 1, p. 6.

64 Ibid., pt. 1, no. 1, pp. 1, 3–5.

65 Ibid., pt. 1, no. 2, pp. 12–16, no. 4, pp. 10–15, no. 8, pp. 13–16, no. 9, pp. 65 1–8.

66 This title page is reproduced in Political Writings of the 1790s, ed. Claeys, Gregory, 8 vols. (London, 1995), 7:213Google Scholar; for details about its publication, see 7:215.

67 Philp, , “Vulgar Conservatism,” p. 57Google Scholar; see also Mitchell, , “The Association Movement,” p. 70Google Scholar, for evidence of how the intimidation of booksellers and publicans allowed the association movement to achieve “many notable successes without ever having recourse to prosecution.” For an account of the 1790s that shifts attention away from prosecution, see Emsley , Clive“Repression, ‘Terror’ and the Rule of Law in England during the Decade of the French Revolution,” English Historical Review 100 (1985): 801–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Association Papers, pt. 1, no. 1, p. 1.

69 See Habermas, Jürgen, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, trans. Berger, Thomas (Cambridge, Mass., 1989), pp. 27, 60Google Scholar.

70 Association Papers, pt. 1, no. 7, pp. 2–4.

71 Smith, Olivia, The Politics of Language, 1791–1819 (Oxford, 1984), pp. 71, 76–77Google Scholar.

72 Philp, , “Vulgar Conservatism,” pp. 62–63Google Scholar.

73 Ibid., p. 63. I take up the case of More and the Cheap Repository Tracts more fully in “‘Study to Be Quiet’: Hannah More and the Invention of Conservative Culture in Britain,” ELH, forthcoming.

74 Association Papers, pt, 2, no. 3, pp. 8–12.

75 See The Englishman's Political Catechism and The English Freeholder's Catechism, in Association Papers, pt. 2, no. 3, pp. 13–15, no. 10, pp. 1–8. The former tract was adapted from Bolingbroke's, LordThe Freeholder's Political Catechism (London, 1733)Google Scholar. Gary Kelly has made the point about a reversion from dialogue to catechism with respect to More's Cheap Repository Tracts, in “Revolution, Reaction, and the Expropriation of Popular Culture: Hannah More's Cheap Repository,” Man and Nature/L'Homme et La Nature 6 (1987): 152Google Scholar. For a suggestive treatment of the authority of a catechistic method within late eighteenth-century educational practices, see Richardson, Alan, Literature, Education, and Romanticism: Reading as Social Practice, 1780–1832 (Cambridge, 1994), pp. 64–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

76 For Burke's use of the almanac in order to expose the new and more volatile conditions of revolutionary era publicity, see my “Burke, Popular Opinion, and the Problem of a Counter-Revolutionary Public Sphere,” in Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France: New Interdisciplinary Essays, ed. Whale, John (Manchester, 2000), pp. 107–8Google Scholar.

77 Association Papers, pt. 2, no. 12, pp. 12–13, 16, 20.

78 [Jones, William,] One Penny-Worth More, or, A Second Letter from Thomas Bull to His Brother John (London, [1792])Google Scholar, unpaginated broadsheet tract.

79 For a careful study of this tradition, see Philips, David, “Good Men to Associate and Bad Men to Conspire: Associations for the Prosecution of Felons in England, 1760–1860,” in Policing and Prosecution in Britain, 1750–1850, ed. Hay, Douglas and Snyder, Francis (Oxford, 1989), pp. 113–70Google Scholar.

80 See Black, , The Association, pp. 253–55Google Scholar; Goodwin, , The Friends of Liberty, pp. 273–74Google Scholar.

81 Some of these pamphlets have been collected in The Friends to the Liberty of the Press: Eight Tracts, 1792–1793, ed. Parks, Stephen (New York and London, 1974)Google Scholar.

82 Liu, Alan, “Wordsworth and Subversion, 1793–1804: Trying Cultural Criticism,” Yale Journal of Criticism 2 (1989): 68–69Google Scholar.

83 The Resolutions of the First Meeting of the Friends to the Liberty of the Press (London, 1793), p. 4.

84 Association Papers, pt. 1, no. 4, p. 2. Bowles had immediate reasons for aligning private initiative with government policy in this way, since like many association pamphleteers he held an official position in the government and was also secretly paid for his work. See Mitchell, , “The Association Movement,” p. 59Google Scholar.

85 Association Papers, pt. 1, no. 4, p. 4.

86 Ibid., pp. 4, 8.