Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:54:22.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Galton Lecture 1968: The race concept in human biology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2011

G. Ainsworth Harrison
Affiliation:
Department of Human Anatomy, University of Oxford

Extract

Until very recently physical anthropology has been more or less exclusively concerned with the study of the evolutionary origins of man and with race. During the first half of this century a vast body of literature accumulated describing the physical characteristics of the world's many populations, both past and present, and classifying these populations into races. Innumerable classifications appeared, which not only varied according to their authors' views as to which race a particular population should be ascribed but also, very strikingly, in the number of races that were considered as compounding the human species. Some recognized as few as three or four, others as many as thirty or more. No small effort was spent in searching for methods to ascribe individuals to one race or another and some people were regarded as being more ‘typical’ of a particular race than others.

Type
Demographic aspects
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dobzhansky, Th. (1962) Comment: On the non-existence of human races. Curr. Anthrop. 3, 279.Google Scholar
Hiorns, R.W., Harrison, G.A., Boyce, A.J. & Küchemann, C.F. (1968) A mathematical analysis of the effects of movement on the relatedness between populations. Ann. hum. Genet. 32, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, F.B. (1962) On the non-existence of human races. Curr. Anthrop. 3, 279.Google Scholar
Morton, N.E. (1968) Problems and methods in the genetics of primitive groups. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 28, 191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed