Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:17:56.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fertility on the US–Mexico border

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Charles W. Warren
Affiliation:
US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, Center for Health Promotion and Education, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Richard S. Monteith
Affiliation:
US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, Center for Health Promotion and Education, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
J. Timothy Johnson
Affiliation:
US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, Center for Health Promotion and Education, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Summary

Using Bongaarts' model, the relative importance of the proximate determinants of fertility is explored in five populations on the US–Mexico border. For the groups closest to natural fertility (the two Mexican groups), lactation, use of contraception, and marriage all were moderately important in terms of their direct effect on fertility. For the group with lowest fertility (Anglo-American), contraceptive use was an important factor inhibiting fertility; marriage was important but not nearly as important as contraceptive use. For the two US Mexican-American groups, contraceptive use was an important intermediate variable, not as important as for Anglo-Americans, but more important than it was for the two populations in Mexico. The proportion married was a moderately important factor for the Mexican-American groups. For these five populations the principal differences in fertility rates result from substantial differences in the use of effective contraception. Bongaarts' model proved very useful as an analytical framework in this study.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bongaarts, J. (1978) A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility. Popul. Dev. 4, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongaarts, J. (1982) The fertility-inhibiting effect of the intermediate fertility variables. Stud. Fam. Plann. 13, 179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bongaarts, J. & Potter, R. G. (1983) Fertility, Biology and Behavior: An Analysis of the Proximate Determinants. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control (1980) Texas Fertility, 1950–1977. Atlanta, US.Google Scholar
Davis, K. & Blake, J. (1956) Social structure and fertility: an analytic framework. Econ. Dev. cult. Change, 4, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manautou, J. M., Nunez, J. G., Fernandez, L. N. & Davila, O. M. (1981) Fecundidad, Uso de Metodos Anticonceptivos y Atencion Maternal en la Zona Fronteriza Mexico–Estados Unidos. Jefatura de Servicios de Planificacion Familiar, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico.Google Scholar
POPLAB (1980) The 1979 Mexico National Fertility and Mortality Survey: A Summary of Results. Laboratories for Population Statistics, Summary Series No. 2. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Rochat, R. W., Warren, C. W., Smith, J. C., Holck, S. & Friedman, J. S. (1981) Family planning practices among Anglo and Hispanic women in U.S. counties bordering Mexico. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 13, 176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, C. W. (1987) Fertility determinants in Puerto Rico. Stud. Fam. Plann. 18, 42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, C. W., Smith, J. C., Nunez, J. G., Rochat, R. W. & Manautou, J. M. (1981) Contraceptive use and family planning services along the U.S.–Mexico border. Int. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 7, 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar