Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:11:19.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Breast-feeding as cultural or personal decision: sources of information and actual succes in Japan and the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Nancy Shand
Affiliation:
The Menninger Foundation, Topeka, Kansas, USA
Yorio Kosawa
Affiliation:
Kobe University, Kobe, Japan

Summary

The impact of sources of information about breast-feeding used by Japanese and American primiparous women during pregnancy is examined in relation to subsequent maternal behaviour and success in breast-feeding infants during the 1st week, 1st month, and 3rd month after birth. Culture differences were found in the sources of information used. Japanese mothers used more sources reflecting a formal, impersonal, group-oriented ‘learning context’, while American mothers used a greater variety of sources, reflecting both an informal, private, personalized approach and a formal approach. Hospital classes taught by nurses were significantly negatively correlated with success in breast-feeding in both cultures (r = −0.78, P < 0·01). Private consultations with health professionals and reading materials (books, magazines, pamphlets) were found to have little or no correlation with success in breast-feeding. The findings indicate that present sources of information on breast-feeding are not achieving the desired result—assisting women in learning to breast-feed their infants successfully. Sources of information need to be re-evaluated in terms of content, tenor, and the culture learning context in which information is being disseminated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berg, A. & Muscat, R.J. (1973) The Nutrition Factor, Its Role in National Development. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Berkman, P.L. (1969) Spouseless motherhood, physical stress and physical morbidity. J. Hlth social Behav. 10, 323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Block, C.R., Block, R. & Shrock, P. (1975) The effect of support of the husband and obstetrician on pain perception and control in childbirth. Birth Fam. J. 2, 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, R. (1975) Breast-feeding: Aid to Infant Health and Fertility Control. Population Reports, Series J-4, p. 49. Department of Medical and Public Affairs, George Washington University, Washington, DC.Google ScholarPubMed
Burgess, A.P. (1976) A Study of Attitudes to, and Knowledge of Breast-feeding among Health Personnel, School Teachers and Social Workers in Pasay City. MPH thesis, Institute of Public Health, University of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Butz, W.P., Delgado, H., Habicht, J.P., Klein, R., Pillet, B., Piveral, V.M., Stein, J., Teller, C. & Yarbrough, C. (1975) Some Uses of Integrated Economic–Demographic Data on Households in Less Developed Countries: Illustrations from a Guatemalan Survey. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica.Google Scholar
Davids, A., DeVault, S. & Talmadge, M. (1961) Anxiety, pregnancy and childbirth abnormalities, J. consult. Psychol. 25, 74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greiner, T. (1975) The Promotion of Bottle-feeding by Multinational Corporations: How Advertising and the Health Professionals have Contributed. International Nutrition Monograph Series No. 2. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Grimm, E.R. (1967) Psychological and social factors in pregnancy, delivery and outcome. In: Childbearing—Its Social and Psychological Aspects. Edited by Richardson, S. A. & Guttmacher, A. F.. Williams & Wilkins, New York.Google Scholar
Illsley, R. (1967) The sociological study of reproduction and its outcome. In: Childbearing—Its Social and Psychological Aspects, p. 76. Edited by Richardson, S. A. & Guttmacher, A. F.. Williams & Wilkins, New York.Google Scholar
Jelliffe, D.B. & Jelliffe, E.F.P. (1970) The urban avalanche and child nutrition, I and II. J. Am. diet. Ass. 57, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelliffe, D.B. & Jelliffe, E.F.P. (1977) The infant food industry and international child health. Int. J. Hlth Services, 7, 249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knodel, J. (1977) Breast-feeding and population growth. Science, N.Y. 198, 1111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mead, M. & Newton, N. (1967) Cultural patterning of perinatal behavior. In: Childbearing—Its Social and Psychological Aspects, p. 142. Edited by Richardson, S. A. & Guttmacher, A. F.. Williams & Wilkins, New York.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, K.B., Cassel, J. & Kaplan, B.H. (1972) Psychosocial asset, life crisis and prognosis of pregnancy. Am. J. Epidemiol. 95, 431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raphael, D.L. (1976) The Tender Gift: Breast-feeding. Shocken Books, New York.Google Scholar
Shand, N. (1981) The reciprocal impact of breast-feeding and culture form on maternal behaviour and infant development. J. biosoc. Sci. 13, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vahlquist, B. (1975) Evolution of breast-feeding in Europe. J. trop. pediat. envir. child Hlth, 21, 11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, H.B., Paramathypathy, K. & Tham, N.B. (1963) Breast-feeding among lower income mothers in Singapore. J. Singapore pediat. Soc. 5, 89.Google Scholar