Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:05:46.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Association between number of sexual partners and utilization of family planning and sexually transmitted infection services by men aged 15–44 in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2019

Mian B. Hossain ,
Yvonne Bronner ,
Ifeyinwa Udo  and
Sabriya Dennis
Mian B. Hossain*
Affiliation:
School of Community Health and Policy, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Yvonne Bronner
Affiliation:
School of Community Health and Policy, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Ifeyinwa Udo
Affiliation:
School of Community Health and Policy, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Sabriya Dennis
Affiliation:
School of Community Health and Policy, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) pose a huge public health problem in the United States. Efforts towards reducing unintended pregnancies have previously focused on women, but the role of men in family planning and preventing unwanted pregnancy is becoming clearer. The primary objective of the study was to fully examine the utilization of family planning services by men in the US, and to determine whether factors such as race, health insurance type and number of sexual partners influenced their utilization and receipt of family planning services and STI-related health services. Data were from the 2006–2010 National Survey on Family Growth (NSFG) study conducted in the US. The study sample comprised 7686 men aged 14–44 who ever had sex with women, and who had had at least one sexual partner in the 12 months before the survey. The receipt of family planning and STI-related health services by this group of men was estimated. The results showed that non-Hispanic Black men were more likely to receive family planning and STI-related services than Hispanic and non-Hispanic White males. Given that non-Hispanic Black men are disproportionately affected by STIs and are a high-risk group, the finding that this group received more family planning and STI services is a positive step towards reducing the disproportionately high prevalence of STIs in men in this under-privileged population.

Keywords

Men’s family planningSexually transmitted infectionNumber of sexual partners
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 14 - 26
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abma, JC, Martinez, GM, Mosher, WD and Dawson, BS (2004) Teenagers in the United States: sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, 2002. Vital and Health Statistics 23(24), 1–48.Google Scholar
Anderson, DM and Portner, CC (2014) High school dropouts and sexually transmitted infections. Southern Economic Journal 81(1), 113–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borrero, S, Farkas, A, Dehlendorf, C and Rocca, CH (2013) Racial and ethnic differences in men’s knowledge and attitudes about contraception. Contraception 88(4), 532–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyer, CB, Shafer, MA, Shaffer, RA, Brodine, SK, Pollack, LM, Betsinger, K and Schachter, J (2005) Evaluation of a cognitive-behavioral, group, randomized controlled intervention trial to prevent sexually transmitted infections and unintended pregnancies in young women. Preventive Medicine 40(4), 420–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buzi, RS and Smith, PB (2014) Access to sexual and reproductive health care services: young men’s perspectives. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 40(2), 149–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013) HIV Surveillance Report, 2011, Vol. 23. URL: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports/ (accessed 26 March 2015).Google Scholar
Chabot, MJ, Lewis, C, de Bocanegra, HT and Darney, P (2011) Correlates of receiving reproductive health care services among U.S. men aged 15 to 44 years. American Journal of Men’s Health 5(4), 358–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, B, McGuire, TG and Zaslavsky, AM (2012) Measuring racial/ethnic disparities in health care: methods and practical issues. Health Services Research 47(3 part 2), 1232–1254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darroch, JE, Singh, S and Nadeau, J (2008) Contraception: an investment in lives, health and development. Issues in Brief (Alan Guttmacher Institute) 5, 1–4.Google Scholar
Dehlendorf, C, Rodriguez, MI, Levy, K, Borrero, S and Steinauer, J (2010) Disparities in family planning. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 202(3), 214–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finer, LB and Henshaw, SK (2006) Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 38(2), 90–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finer, LB and Philbin, JM (2014) Trends in ages at key reproductive transitions in the United States, 1951–2010. Women’s Health Issues: Official Publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women’s Health 24(3), e271–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holtgrave, DR (2014) Development of year 2020 goals for the national HIV/AIDS strategy for the United States. AIDS and Behavior 18(4), 638–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hosmer, DW Jr and Lemeshow, S (2000) Applied Logistic Regression. Second Edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, E, Karasz, A and Gold, M (2011) Family formation in the inner city: low-income men’s perception of their role in unplanned conception and pregnancy prevention. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 22(1), 71–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Jemmott, JB 3rd, Jemmott, LS, Braverman, PK and Fong, GT (2005) HIV/STD risk reduction interventions for African American and Latino adolescent girls at an adolescent medicine clinic: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 159(5), 440–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalmuss, D and Tatum, C (2007) Patterns of men’s use of sexual and reproductive health services. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 39(2), 74–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lepkowski, JM, Mosher, WD, Davis, KE, Groves, RM and Van Hoewyk, J. (2010) The 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth: aample design and analysis of a continuous survey. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics 2(150).Google Scholar
Lindberg, LD, Sonfield, A and Gemmill, A (2008) Reassessing adolescent male sexual and reproductive health in the United States: research and recommendations. American Journal of Men’s Health 2(1), 40–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moonesinghe, R, Chang, M and Truman, BI (2013) Health insurance coverage– United States, 2008 and 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (Centers for Disease Control) 62(3), 61–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Porter, LE and Ku, L (2000) Use of reproductive health services among young men, 1995. Journal of Adolescent Health 27(3), 186–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rink, E, Four Star, K, Elk, JM, Dick, R, Jewett, L and Gesink, D (2012) Young Native American men and their intention to use family planning services. American Journal of Men’s Health 6(4), 324–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
StataCorp (2015) Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. StataCorp LP, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
Sutton, MY, Jones, RL, Wolitski, RJ, Cleveland, JC., Dean, HD and Fenton, KA (2009) A review of the centers for disease control and prevention’s response to the HIV/AIDS crisis among blacks in the United States, 1981–2009. American Journal of Public Health 99(Supplement 2), S351–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, CP, Warner, L, Gavin, L and Barfield, W (2014) Receipt of reproductive health services among sexually experienced persons aged 15–19 years– National Survey of Family Growth, United States, 2006–2010. Use of selected clinical preventive services to improve the health of infants, children, and adolescents – United States, 1999–2011. CDC MMWR (Supplement) 63(2), 89–98.Google Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services (2014) Family Planning. URL: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4847a1.htm.Google Scholar