Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T01:19:09.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incorporating Distributional Issues into Benefit Cost Analysis: Why, How, and Two Empirical Examples Using Non-market Valuation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2021

John B. Loomis
John B. Loomis*
Affiliation:
Colorado State University - Fort Collins
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article reviews the rationale for and various approaches used by economists to incorporate distributional consequences of projects or policies into benefit-cost analyses. Approaches reviewed include distributional weights and metrics based on the Lorenz curve. Analysis of distributional issues in partial equilibrium and general equilibrium settings are briefly reviewed. We present an empirical demonstration of how the contingent valuation method (CVM) and hedonic property methods (HPM) can be used to quantify how non-market environmental benefits are distributed by income and ethnicity. Using CVM, the distribution of non-market benefits can be cross-tabbed with respondent demographics, so that a variety of “distributions” of benefits by relevant demographic groups can be calculated. Using the HPM, the analyst can statistically test to see if the implicit price gradient varies with differences in income and ethnicity. In our empirical example, we find that ethnicity and income interaction terms on the implicit price gradient are statistically significant suggesting differential effects of National Forest fire suppression policies on Hispanics and low income households.

Keywords

contingent valuation methoddistributionequityenvironmental justicehedonic property methodLorenz Curve
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , 03 January 2011 , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis 2011

References

Alder, M. 2008. Risk Equity: A New Proposal. Harvard Environmental Law Review 32: 1-47.Google Scholar
Banzhaf, S. and Walsh, R.. 2008. Do People Vote with Their Feet? An Empirical Test of Tiebout’s Mechanism. American Economic Review 98(3): 843-863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berck, P. and Hoffmann, S.. 2002. Assessing the Employment Impacts of Environmental and Natural Resource Policy. Environmental and Resource Economics 22: 133-156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boadway, R. 1976. Integrating Equity and Efficiency in Applied Welfare Economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics 90: 541-556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boadway, R. and Wildasin, D.. 1984. Public Sector Economics. Little, Brown and Company. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Brent, R. 1996. Applied Cost-Benefit Analysis. Edward Elgar, Brookfield, VT.Google Scholar
Cornes, R. and Sandler, T.. 1996. The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods and Club Goods, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa-Font, A. McGuire and Stanley, T.. 2009. Health Care as a Luxury: Winner’s Curse and Publication Selection Bias. Unpublished manuscript, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, U.K. Google Scholar
Diamond, P. and Hausman, J.. 1994. Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4): 45-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espinosa, A. and Smith, V.K.. 1995. Measuring the Environmental Consequences of Trade Policy: A Nonmarket CGE Analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(3): 772-777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrow, S. Forthcoming. Incorporating Equity in Regulatory and Benefit-Cost Analysis Using Risk Based Preferences. Risk Analysis Google Scholar
Fullerton, D. 2009. Distributional Effects of Environmental and Energy Policy. Ashgate Publishers.Google Scholar
Graham, J. 2008. Saving Lives Through Administrative Law and Economics. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 157: 395-538.Google Scholar
Gramlich, E. 1990. A Guide to Benefit-Cost Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Hammitt, J. 2009. Response—Saving Lives: Benefit-Cost Analysis and Distribution. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 157: 395-538.Google Scholar
Hanemann, M. 1994. Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4): 19-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harberger, A. 1984. Basic Needs versus Distributional Weights in Social Benefit Cost Analysis. Economic Development and Cultural Change 32(3): 455-474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, C. 1971. Benefit-Cost Analysis for Water System Planning. Water Resources Monograph 2, American Geophysical Union, Washington DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, G. 1987. The Incidence of Fuel Taxes: A Comparative Study of Three Countries. In Newbery, D. and Stern, N. (eds). The Theory of Taxation for Development. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Just, R., Hueth, D., Schmitz, A.. 1982. Applied Welfare Economics and Public Policy. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Krutilla, K. 2005. Using the Kaldor-Hicks Tableau Format for Cost Benefit Analysis and Policy Evaluation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24(4): 864-865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuthold, R. 1969. Government Payments and the Distribution of Income in Agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 51(5): 1520-1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, D., Mallar, C. and Thornton, C.. 1981. Evaluating the Benefits and Costs of the Job Corps. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1(1): 55-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomis, J. 2008. Estimating the Economic Benefits of Maintaining Peak Instream Flows in the Poudre River through Fort Collins, Colorado. Dept. of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
Loomis, J. and Revier, C.. 1988. Measuring Regressivity of Excise Taxes: A Buyers Index. Public Finance Quarterly, 16 (3): 301-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomis, J. and duVair, P.. 1993. Evaluating the Effect of Alternative Risk Communication Devices on Willingness to Pay: Results from a Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Experiment. Land Economics 69(3): 287-298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomis, J., Bell, P., Zita-Cooney, H. and Asmus, C.. 2009. A Comparison of Actual and Hypothetical Willingness to Pay of Parents and Non-Parents for Protecting Infant Health: The Case of Nitrates in Drinking Water. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics (3): 697-712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loury, G. 1983. Efficiency and Equity Impacts of Natural Gas Regulation in Haveman, R. and Margolis, J. (eds). Public Expenditure and Policy Analysis, 3rd Edition. Houghton Mifflian, Boston MA.Google Scholar
Portney, P. 1994. The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4): 3-17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassone, P. and Schaffer, W.. 1978. Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Handbook. Academic Press, NY.Google Scholar
Schmitz, A. and Schmitz, T.. 2010. Benefit-Cost Analysis: Distributional Considerations under Production Quota Buyouts. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 1(1): DOI: 10.2202/2152-2812.1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starrett, D. 1988. Foundations of Public Economics, Cambridge University Press, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavins, Robert. 1998. What Can We Learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Lessons from the SO2 Allowance Trading. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(3): 69-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suits, D. 1977. Measurement of Tax Progressivity. American Economic Review 67: 747-752.Google Scholar
Tresch, 1981. Public Finance: A Normative Theory. Business Publications, TX Google Scholar
Thompson, M., Read, J.S., Liang, M.. 1984. Feasibility of Willingness to Pay Measurement in Chronic Arthritis. Medical Decision Making 4(2): 195-215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses. EPA 240-R-00-003, Washington DC.Google Scholar
U.S. Water Resources Council. 1983. Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Studies. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Vining, A. and Weimer, D.. 2010. An Assessment of Important Issues Concerning the Application of Benefit Cost Analysis to Social Policy. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 1(1): DOI: 10.2202/2152-2812.1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zabel, J. 2004. The Demand for Housing Services. Journal of Housing Economics 13: 16-35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerbe, Richard Jr. and Dively, Dwight 1994. Benefit-Cost Analysis in Theory and Practice. Harper Collins. New York.Google Scholar