Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:53:40.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Respecting Different Ways of Life: A Daoist Ethics of Virtue in the Zhuangzi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2010

Yong Huang
Get access

Abstract

As the ethics of virtue, with a focus on cultivating admirable traits of character instead of commanding adherence to rigid rules, becomes increasingly popular in contemporary moral discourses, scholars have tried to find evidence of virtue ethics in such ancient traditions as Hinduism, Buddhism, and Confucianism. This article explores the possibility of a virtue ethics in a tradition that has been largely neglected, Chinese Daoism, by focusing on one of the most important classics in this tradition, the Zhuangzi. Contrary to a common misconception of the Zhuangzi as skeptical, relativistic, and therefore empty of any guide to moral life, it presents a solid normative ethics through various stories, and this normative ethics is a virtue ethics. The most important trait of character in this Daoist virtue ethics is respect for different ways of life—a virtue not discussed in any familiar versions of virtue ethics in the West and yet most valuable to contemporary life in a global and pluralistic society.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 69 , Issue 4 , November 2010 , pp. 1049 - 1069
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Annas, Julia. 2006. “Virtue Ethics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, ed. David, Copp, 515–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carr, Karen L., and Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2000. The Sense of Anti-Rationalism: The Religious Thought of Zhuangzi and Kierkegaard. New York: Seven Bridges Press.Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur C. 1987. Mysticism and Morality: Oriental Thought and Moral Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Eno, Robert. 1996. “Cook Ding's Dao and the Limits of Philosophy.” In Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi, ed. Kjellberg, Paul and Ivanhoe, Philip J., 127–51. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Alan. 2002. “Concrete Ethics in a Comparative Perspective: Zhuangzi Meets William James.” In Varieties of Ethical Reflection: New Directions for Ethics in a Global Context, ed. Barnhart, Michael, 67–92. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Gier, Nicholas F. 2004. The Virtue of Nonviolence: From Gautama to Gandhi. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Gier, Nicholas F.. 2005. “Toward a Hindu Virtue Ethics.” In Contemporary Issues in Constructive Dharma, ed. Sherma, R. D. and Deepak, A., 151–62. Hampton, Va.: Deepak Heritage Books.Google Scholar
Graham, A. C. 1983. “Taoist Spontaneity and the Dichotomy of ‘Is’ and ‘Ought.’” In Experimental Essays on Chuang-tzu, ed. Mair, Victor H., 3–23. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Chad. 1992. A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Yong. 2005. “A Copper Rule versus the Golden Rule: A Daoist-Confucian Proposals for Global Ethics.” Philosophy East and West 55 (3): 394–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yong.. 2010a. “The Ethics of Difference in the Zhuangzi.” Journal of American Academy of Religion 78 (1): 65–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yong.. 2010b. “The Self-Centeredness Objection: Zhu Xi's Neo-Confucian Response.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (4) (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yong.. 2011. “Two Dilemmas of Virtue Ethics and How Zhu Xi's Neo-Confucianism Avoids Them.” Journal of Philosophical Research 36 (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hursthouse, Rosalind. 1999. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ivanhoe, Philip J. 1993. “Zhuangzi on Skepticism, Skill, and the Ineffable Dao.” Journal of American Academy of Religion 61 (4): 639–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanhoe, Philip J.. 1996. “Was Zhuangzi a Relativist?” In Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi, ed. Kjellberg, Paul and Ivanhoe, Philip J., 196–214. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1956. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Keown, Damien. 1992. The Nature of Buddhist Ethics. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keown, Damien.. 1996. “Karma, Character, and Consequentialism.” Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (2): 329–50.Google Scholar
Liu Xiaogan, . 劉笑敢 1993. Zhuangzi zhexue jiqi yanbian 莊子哲學及其演變 [Zhuangzi's philosophy and its development]. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Liu Xiaogan, . 2006. Lao Zi gu jin: Wu zhong dui kan yu xi ping yin lun (shang) 老子古今:五種對勘與析評引論 [The Laozi in the past and present: Annotations and philosophical commentary on the five texts]. Beijing: Zhong guo she hui ke xue chu ban she.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1991. On Liberty. In Utilitarianism, On Liberty, Considerations on Representative Government, ed. Action, H. B.. London: Everyman's Library.Google Scholar
Perkins, Franklin. 2005. “Following Nature with Mengzi or Zhuangzi.” International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3): 327–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sim, May. 2007. Remastering Morals with Aristotle and Confucius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slingerland, Edward. 2003. Effortless Action: Wu-wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slote, Michael. 1992. From Morality to Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slote, Michael.. 1997. “Virtue Ethics.” In Three Methods of Ethics, by Baron, Marcia M., Pettit, Philip, and Slote, Michael, 175–238. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Slote, Michael.. 2001. Morals from Motives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statman, Daniel, ed. 1997. Virtue Ethics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocker, Michael. 1997. “The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories.” In Virtue Ethics, ed. Crisp, Roger and Slote, Michael, 66–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Junyi, Tang 唐君毅 1992. Zhongguo zhexue yuanlun: Yuandao pian (1) 中國哲學原論 .原道篇 [Original Chinese philosophy: The original Dao]. Taibei: Xue sheng shu ju.Google Scholar
Van Norden, Bryan W. 2007. Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, Christian Helmut. 2003. “Ethics and Zhuangzi: Awareness, Freedom, and Autonomy.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 30 (1): 115–26.Google Scholar
Wong, David. 1984. Moral Relativity. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, David.. 2006. Natural Moralities: A Defense of Pluralistic Relativism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang Guorong, . 2006. Zhuangzi de sixiang shijie 莊子的思想世界 [Zhuangzi's intellectual world]. Beijing: Beijing University Press.Google Scholar
Yearley, Lee H. 1996. “Zhuangzi's Understanding of Skillfulness and the Ultimate Spiritual State.” In Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi, ed. Kjellberg, Paul and Ivanhoe, Philip J., 152–82. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Yearley, Lee H.. 2007. “Zhuangzi's Radical Virtue Ethics.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Yu, Jiyuan. 2007. The Ethics of Confucius and Aristotle: Mirrors of Virtue. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zhuangzi, . 1995. In Zhuangzi jie jie 莊子集解 [Collected commentaries on the Zhuangzi]. Comp. by Guo Qingfan 郭慶藩. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar