Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:45:45.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

K. P. Landon's Southeast Asia. Crossroad of Religions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Lawrence Palmer Briggs
Lawrence Palmer Briggs
Affiliation:
Princeton, New Jersey
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comments
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , May 1951 , pp. 271 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Maspero, Henri, “Les origines de la civilisation chinoise,” Annales de géographic, 15 (March 1926), 145Google Scholar; Maspero, Henri, La Chine antique (Paris, 1925), 25–28, 424Google Scholar; Aurousseau, Leonard, “La premiere conquête chinoise des pays annamites,” Bulletin de l'Ecole Française d'Extrême-Orient (hereafter BEFEO), 23 (1923), 137–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Briggs, Lawrence Palmer, “The appearance and historical usage of the terms Tai, Thai, Siamese and Laos,” Journal of the American Oriental Society (hereafter JAOS), 69 (1949), 71; hereafter cited as “Tai, Thai.”CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Coedès, George, Les états hindouisés d'Indochine et d'Indonesie (Paris, 1948), 289.Google Scholar

4 Boulanger, Paul Le, Histoire du Laos française (Paris, 1930) 35–41; Briggs, “Tai, Thai,” 65, 70.Google Scholar

5 Briggs, “Dvāravatī, the most ancient kingdom of Siam,” JAOS, 65 (1945), 104.Google Scholar

6 The term Menam, which has a long-established usage by the best writers on the subject, is here used to designate the whole river system, except its northwest affluent—the upper Meping—which was the seat of the independent Mon kingdom of Haripunjai.

7 Briggs, “Tai, Thai,” 71; Coedès, , “L'année du lièvre, 1219 A.D.,” India antiqua (1947), 82–88.Google Scholar

8 Briggs, “Tai, Thai,” 67–68.

9 G. E. Harvey, A history of Burma (London, 1925), 110–11.

10 Coedès, , “Documents sur l'histoire politique et religieuse du Laos occidental,” BEFEO, 25 (1925), 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Ibid., 159.

12 Coedès, G. et Pierre Dupont, “L'inscription de Sdok Kak Thorn (hereafter cited as “S.K.T.”), BEFEO, 43 (1943–1946), 72.Google Scholar

13 Coedès, “Documents, etc.,” 159.

14 Coedès, , “Le royaume de Çrlvijaya,” BEFEO, 18, no. 6 (1918), 1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Briggs, , “The origin of the Śailendra dynasty. Present status of the question” (hereafter cited as “Śailendra”), JAOS, 70 (1950), 78.Google Scholar

15 Briggs, , “The Khmer empire and the Malay peninsula,” Far Eastern quarterly, 9 (May 1950), 275–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar, hereafter “Malay peninsula;” Coedès, “Le royaume de Çrīivijaya: 1. Inscription de Vieng Sa (error for Ligor),” 29–31; Vogel, J. Ph., “Het koninkrijk Śrīvijaya,” Bijdragen tot de taal, land-en volkenkunde van Nederlandisch-Indie, 75 (1919), 626–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Briggs, “Śailendra,” 80: Śāstrī, Hiranandra, “The Nālandā copperplate of Devapaladeva,” Epigraphie Indica, 17 (1923–1924). 310–27.Google Scholar

17 Coedès, Etats hindouisés, 183–86, 214–20; Briggs “Malay peninsula,” 279.

18 Briggs, “Malay peninsula,” 277; Ferrand, Gabriel, L'empire sumatranais de Çrīvijaya (Paris, 1922), 52–59.Google Scholar

19 Briggs, “Malay peninsula,” 274–80.

20 Ferrand, Çrīvijaya, 61.

21 Finot, Louis, “Notes d'epigraphie: 15. L'inscription de Sdok Kak Thom,” BEFEO, 15 (1915), 87, stanzas 61–64.Google Scholar

22 Finot, “S.K.T.,” 88, st. 12–13.

23 Coedès, “Etudes cambodgienne: 21. Les traditions génealogiques des premiers rois d'Angkor; d'apres les inscriptions de Yaśovannan I et de Rājendravarman II,” BEFEO, 28 (1928), 132.

24 Briggs, , The ancient Khmer empire (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1951), 82.Google Scholar

25 Finot, “S.K.T.,” 88, St. 69–78.

26 Briggs, , “A sketch of Cambodian history,” FEQ, 6 (Aug. 1947), 350.Google Scholar

27 Coedès, , “Etudes cambodgienne: 87. La cite de Janapada d'après une inscription de Prasat Khna,” BEFEO, 43 (1943–1946), 8–11.Google Scholar

28 Finot, “S.K.T.,” 87–88, st. 61–78; Coedès et Dupont, “L'inscription de Sdok Kak Thom,” BEFEO, 43 (1943–46), 96, st. 27; 106–10, st. 61–77.

29 Finot, “S.K.T.,” 88, st. 69–78; also Coedès et Dupont, “S.K.T.,” 106–10, St. 61–77.

30 Finot, “S.K.T.,” 80, st. 29; Coedès et Dupont, ibid., 96, St. 29.

31 Stern, Philippe, “Le temple montagne-khmer; le culte du linga et le devarāja,” BEFEO, 34 (1934), 614–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32 Briggs, , “The Hinduired states of Southeast Asia: a review,” FEQ, 7 (Aug. 1948), 388–89.Google Scholar

33 Coedès, Etats hindouisés, 68.

34 Briggs, “The Hinduized states,” 386.

35 Coedès, , “La stele de Ta Prohm,” BEFEO, 6 (1906), st. 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36 Coedès, , “Le stele de Prah Khan d'Angkor,” BEFEO, 40 (1940), st. 36.Google Scholar

37 Coedès, , “Nouvelles découvertes à Angkor,” Cahiers de l'EFEO, nos. 20–21 (1939), 18–19.Google Scholar

38 Briggs, , “The syncretization of religions in Southeast Asia, especially in Cambodia,” JAOS, 71 (1951).Google Scholar

39 Barth, Auguste, “Inscriptions Sanscrites du Cambodge: 17. Lovek,” in Académic des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres: notices et extraits des manuscrits (Paris, 1885), B st. 32.Google Scholar

40 Sir Monier-Williams, Monier, Brahmanism and Hinduism (London, 1891), 74–75Google Scholar; Sir Eliot, Charles, Hinduism and Buddhism (London, 1921), 3: 114.Google Scholar

41 Dowson, John, A classical dictionary of Hindu mythology and religion, geography, history and literature (London, 1878), 177.Google Scholar

42 Foucher, Alfred, “The influences of Indian art in Cambodia and Java,” in Sir Asutoch Mookerjee silver jubilee volumes (Calcutta, 1922), 3:1, 23.Google Scholar

43 Coedès, Pour mieux comprendre Angkor (Paris, 1947), 142–43.Google Scholar

44 Coedès, , “Les bas'Angkor Wat,” Bulletin de la Commission Archéologique de l'Indochine (1911), 203.Google Scholar

45 Briggs, “Tai, Thai,” 62, especially note 19.

46 Quaritch-Wales, H. G., Toward Angkor (London, 1937), 102Google Scholar; Dupont, , “Variétés archéologues: 1. Vishnu mitrés de l'Indochine occidentale,” BEFEO, 42 (1942), 233.Google Scholar

47 Briggs, , “Siamese attacks on Angkor before 1430,” FEQ, 8 (Nov. 1948), 3–33.Google Scholar