Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:06:57.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Hatoyama to Hatoyama

Review products

Taishō seiji sbi (A political history of the Taishō period). By SeisaburŌShinobu. Tokyo: Kawade Shobō. Vol. 1, 1951, 322; Vol. 2, 1951, 368; Vol. 3, 1952; 327; Vol. 4, 1952, 351, Appendix, 112.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Marius B. Jansen
Marius B. Jansen
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , November 1954 , pp. 65 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Fortunately American political scientists like Yanaga, Chitoshi, Japan Since Perry (New York: 1949)Google Scholar Chapters 22–32, and Scalapino, Robert A., Democracy and the Party Movement in Prewar Japan (Berkeley: 1953Google Scholar, Chapters 6 and 7, have not restricted themselves to political narratives.

2 For brief accounts of this controversy see: Ike, Noburaka, “The Development of Capitalism in Japan,” Pacific Affairs, 22 (06 1949), 185–190Google Scholar; Shigeki, Tōyama, Meiji ishin (Tokyo: 1951), 11–21Google Scholar; and Nihonshi kenkyū nyūnon (1949, 1951), 185–216.Google Scholar

3 Sei, Inoue, “Nihon no Sobietto kakumei kanshō sensō,” Rekishigaku kenkyū, No. 151 (05, 1951), No. 153 (09, 1951)Google Scholar; see also the section by the same author in Nihonshi kenkyū nyūnon, 217–305Google Scholar, for a discussion of Meiji historiography.

4 Nisshi sensō (The Sino-Japanese War), 1934Google Scholar; Mutsu gaikō (The Diplomacy of Mutsu), 1935Google Scholar; Gotō Shimpei, 1941Google Scholar; Kindai Nihon gaikō shi (Diplomatic history of Modern Japan), 1942Google Scholar; Kindai Nihon sangyō shi josetsu (Introduction to the history of manufacturing industry of modern Japan), 1942Google Scholar; Meiji seiji shi, 1950.Google Scholar

5 Marius B. Jansen, “Yawaca, Hanyehping, and the Twenty-one Demands,” Pacific Historical Review, 23. 1 (02 1954), 31–48.Google Scholar

6 Lenin, V. I., Selected Works (New York: 1943), 3:180–181Google Scholar, from “The Agrarian Programme of Social-Democracy in the First Russian Revolution, 1905–07,” written in 1907.

7 See the summary of press comment in the Japan Chronicle (Kobe), April 9, 1925, 460; The Osaka Asahi felt that the final bill was the work of “bigoted and ultraconservative people afraid of a sudden extension of suffrage,” and the Nichi-nichi was also unenthusiastic.