Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:29:48.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First passage percolation on sparse random graphs with boundary weights

Part of: Mathematical sociology Special processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2019

Lasse Leskelä  and
Hoa Ngo
Lasse Leskelä*
Affiliation:
Aalto University
Hoa Ngo*
Affiliation:
Aalto University
*
*Postal address: Department of Mathematics and Systems Analysis, Aalto University, Otakaari 1, 02015 Espoo, Finland.
**Email address: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A large and sparse random graph with independent exponentially distributed link weights can be used to model the propagation of messages or diseases in a network with an unknown connectivity structure. In this article we study an extended setting where, in addition, the nodes of the graph are equipped with nonnegative random weights which are used to model the effect of boundary delays across paths in the network. Our main results provide approximative formulas for typical first passage times, typical flooding times, and maximum flooding times in the extended setting, over a time scale logarithmic with respect to the network size.

Keywords

Sparse random graphpercolationfloodingbroadcastingrumor spreadingSI epidemic modelconfiguration modelincubation time

MSC classification

Primary: 60K35: Interacting random processes; statistical mechanics type models; percolation theory
Secondary: 91D30: Social networks
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 458 - 471
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalto, P. and Leskelä, L. (2015). Information spreading in a large population of active transmitters and passive receivers. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 75, 1965–1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amini, H., Draief, M. and Lelarge, M. (2013). Flooding in weighted sparse random graphs. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 27, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amini, H. and Lelarge, M. (2015). The diameter of weighted random graphs. Ann. Appl. Prob. 25, 1686–1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, H. and Britton, T. (2000). Stochastic Epidemic Models and Their Statistical Analysis. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auffinger, A., Damron, M. and Hanson, J. (2015). 50 years of first passage percolation. ArXiv e-prints.Google Scholar
Baroni, E., van der Hofstad, R. and Komjáthy, J. (2017). Nonuniversality of weighted random graphs with infinite variance degree. J. Appl. Prob. 54, 146–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhamidi, S., van der Hofstad, R. and Hooghiemstra, G. (2010). First passage percolation on random graphs with finite mean degrees. Ann. Appl. Prob. 20, 1907–1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollobás, B. (1980). A probabilistic proof of an asymptotic formula for the number of labelled regular graphs. Europ. J. Combinatorics 1, 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, J., Kim, J. H., Lubetzky, E. and Peres, Y. (2010). Diameters in supercritical random graphs via first passage percolation. Combinatorics Prob. Comput. 19, 729–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, J. M. and Welsh, D. J. A. (1965). First-passage percolation, subadditive processes, stochastic networks, and generalized renewal theory. In Proc. Int. Research Seminar, Statistical Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, eds Neyman, J. and Le Cam, L. M.. Springer, New York, pp. 61–110.Google Scholar
Janson, S. (1999). One, two and three times log n/n for paths in a complete graph with random weights. Combinatorics Prob. Comput. 8, 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, S. and Luczak, M. J. (2009). A new approach to the giant component problem. Random Structures Algorithms 34, 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leskelä, L. and Ngo, H. (2017). The impact of degree variability on connectivity properties of large networks. Internet Math. 13, 1–24.Google Scholar
Leskelä, L. and Vihola, M. (2013). Stochastic order characterization of uniform integrability and tightness. Statist. Prob. Lett. 83, 382–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A. W., Olkin, I. and Arnold, B. C. (2011). Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and its Applications. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittel, B. (1987). On spreading a rumor. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 47, 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Hofstad, R. (2018). Random Graphs and Complex Networks. Vol. 2. To appear.Google Scholar
Van Mieghem, P. (2014). Performance Analysis of Complex Networks and Systems. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar