Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:37:27.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The distributional structure of finite moving-average processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

ED McKenzie
ED McKenzie*
Affiliation:
University of Strathclyde
*
∗Postal address: Department of Mathematics, University of Strathclyde, Livingstone Tower, 26 Richmond St., Glasgow G1 1XH, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analysis of time-series models has, in the past, concentrated mainly on second-order properties, i.e. the covariance structure. Recent interest in non-Gaussian and non-linear processes has necessitated exploration of more general properties, even for standard models. We demonstrate that the powerful Markov property which greatly simplifies the distributional structure of finite autoregressions has an analogue in the (non-Markovian) finite moving-average processes. In fact, all the joint distributions of samples of a qth-order moving average may be constructed from only the (q + 1)th-order distribution. The usefulness of this result is illustrated by references to three areas of application: time-reversibility; asymptotic behaviour; and sums and associated point and count processes. Generalizations of the result are also considered.

Keywords

MOVING-AVERAGE PROCESSESNON-GAUSSIAN PROCESSESJOINT DISTRIBUTIONSTIME-REVERSIBILITYCOUNTING PROCESSMOVING-MINIMUM PROCESS
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , June 1988 , pp. 313 - 321
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1988 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Box, G. E. P. and Jenkins, G. M. (1976) Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Holden-Day, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. and Lewis, P. A. W. (1966) The Statistical Analysis of Series of Events. Methuen, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Heuvels, P. (1983) Point processes and multivariate extreme values. J. Multivariate Anal. 13, 257–272.Google Scholar
Gaver, D. P. and Lewis, P. A. W. (1980) First order autoregressive gamma sequences and point processes. Adv. Appl. Prob. 12, 727–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, J. D. (1984) On the marginal distribution of a first order autoregressive process. Statist. Prob. Letters 2, 105–109.Google Scholar
Jacobs, P. A. and Lewis, P. A. W. (1978) Discrete time series generated by mixtures I: correlational and runs properties. J.R. Statist. Soc. B 40, 94–105.Google Scholar
Lawrance, A. J. (1980) Some autoregressive models for point processes. Point Processes and Queueing Problems (Colloquia Mathematica Societatis Janos Bolyai 24) , ed. Bartfai, P. and Tomko, J., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 257–275.Google Scholar
Lawrance, A. J. and Lewis, P. A. W. (1977) An exponential moving-average sequence and point process, EMA(1). J. Appl. Prob. 14, 98–113.Google Scholar
Lawrance, A. J. and Lewis, P. A. W. (1980) An exponential autoregressive-moving average EARMA (p, q) process. J.R. Statist. Soc. B 42, 150–161.Google Scholar
Lawrance, A. J. and Lewis, P. A. W. (1981) A new autoregressive time-series model in exponential variables (NEAR(1)). Adv. Appl. Prob. 13, 826–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, P. A. W., Mckenzie, Ed. and Hugus, D. K. (1986) Gamma Processes. Naval Postgraduate School tech. report NPS55-86-002.Google Scholar
Mckenzie, , Ed. (1985) Some simple models for discrete variate time series. Water Resources Bull. 21, 645–650.Google Scholar
Mckenzie, , Ed. (1986) Autoregressive moving-average processes with negative binomial and geometric marginal distributions. Adv. Appl. Prob. 18, 679–705.Google Scholar
Mckenzie, , Ed. (1988) Some ARMA models for dependent sequences of Poisson counts. Adv. Appl. Prob. 20(4).Google Scholar
Weiss, G. (1975) Time reversibility of linear stochastic processes. J. Appl. Prob. 12, 821–836.Google Scholar