Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:03:10.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multifractal spectra of branching measure on a Galton-Watson tree

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Narn-Rueih Shieh*
Affiliation:
National Taiwan University
S. James Taylor*
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
*
Postal address: Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. Email address: [email protected]
∗∗ Postal address: School of Mathematics, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK.

Abstract

If Z is the branching mechanism for a supercritical Galton-Watson tree with a single progenitor and E[ZlogZ] < ∞, then there is a branching measure μ defined on ∂Γ, the set of all paths ξ which have a unique node ξ|n at each generation n. We use the natural metric ρ(ξ,η) = en, where n = max{k : ξ|k = η|k}, and observe that the local dimension index is d(μ,ξ) = limn→∞ log(μB(ξ|n))/(-n) = α = logm, for μ-almost every ξ. Our objective is to consider the exceptional points where the above display may fail. There is a nontrivial ‘thin’ spectrum for ̄d(μ,ξ) when p1 = P{Z = 1} > 0 and Z has finite moments of all positive orders. Because ̱d(μ,ξ) = a for all ξ, we obtain a ‘thick’ spectrum by introducing the ‘right’ power of a logarithm. In both cases, we find the Hausdorff dimension of the exceptional sets.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]. Athreya, K. B., and Ney, P. (1972). Branching Processes. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
[2]. Bingham, N. H. (1988). On the limit of a supercritical branching process. In A Celebration of Applied Probability (J. Appl. Prob. Spec. Vol. 25A), ed. Gani, J., Applied Probability Trust, Sheffield, pp. 215228.Google Scholar
[3]. Dembo, A., Peres, Y., Rosen, J., and Zeitouni, O. (2000). Thick points for spatial Brownian motions: multifractal analysis of occupation measure. Ann. Prob. 28, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]. Harris, T. E. (1963). The Theory of Branching Processes. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
[5]. Hawkes, J. (1981). Trees generated by a simple branching process. J. London Math. Soc. 24, 373384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]. Hu, X. and Taylor, S. J. (1997). The multifractal structure of stable occupation measure. Stoch. Process. Appl. 66, 283299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]. Khoshnevisan, D., Peres, Y., and Xiao, Y. (2000). Lim sup random fractals. Electron. J. Prob. 5, No. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]. Liu, Q. S. (1996). The exact Hausdorff dimension of a branching set. Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 104, 515538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]. Liu, Q. S. (1996). The growth of an entire characteristic function and the tail probabilities of the limit of a tree martingale. In Trees, eds Chauvin, B. et al., Birkhäuser, Basel.Google Scholar
[10]. Liu, Q. S. (2001). Local dimension of the branching measure on a Galton–Watson tree. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Prob. Statist. 37, 195222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]. Liu, Q. S., and Shieh, N. R. (1999). A uniform limit law for the branching measure on a Galton–Watson tree. Asian J. Math. 3, 381386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]. Lyons, R., Pemantle, R., and Peres, Y. (1995). Ergodic theory on Galton–Watson trees. Ergodic Theory Dynamical Systems 15, 593619.Google Scholar
[13]. Pemantle, R., and Peres, Y. (1995). Galton–Watson trees with the same mean have the same polar sets. Ann. Prob. 23, 11021124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]. Perkins, E. A., and Taylor, S. J. (1998). The multifractal structure of super-Brownian motion. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Prob. Statist. 34, 97138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]. Shieh, N. R., and Taylor, S. J. (1998). Logarithmic multifractal spectrum of stable occupation measure. Stoch. Process. Appl. 75, 249261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar