Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:15:01.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A study of the effects of oak defoliation on understory plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. Haile
Affiliation:
San Juan Experiment Station, at Hesperus, Colorado, U.S.A.

Extract

A great portion of south-western Colorado and the other western states of the U.S.A. is covered with gambel oak (Quercus gambelii). Gambel oak was determined by Brown (1958) to be an important component of the mountain brush type in Colorado. It occurs in pure stands as well as in association with pinyon pine, juniper, ponderosa pine, aspen, and spruce on several million hectares. Ranges covered with gambel oak have relatively low grazing capacity and low availability of the understory vegetation for grazing animals. Jeffries (1965), studying the effect of gambel oak on range forage production, indicated that herbage yield under the oak canopy was less than that of grasses growing in the open. The restriction in forage growth under the oak is attributed to the shading effect rather than the competition for moisture. Therefore, removal of gambel oak would be likely to improve the ranges.

Type
Short Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, H. E. (1958). Gambel oak in tho west central Colorado. Ecology 39, 317327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffries, N. W. (1965). Herbage production on gambel oak range in southwestern Colorado. Journal of Range Management 18, 212213.Google Scholar
McCaleb, J. E., Hodges, E. M. & Dantzman, C. L. (1961). Effect of herbicidal control of Saw Palmetto on associated native forage plants in peninsular Florida. Journal of Range Management 14, 126130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, V. G. & McCloud, D. E. (1962). Climatic factors in forage production. Forages, pp. 359376. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Wilm, H. G., Costello, D. F. & Klipple, G. E. (1944). Estimating forage yield by the double sampling method. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy 36, 194203.Google Scholar