Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:10:55.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Statistical research on the fate of water in the adult cow. I. Dry cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Paquay
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cureghem, Brussels 7, Belgium
R. De Baere
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cureghem, Brussels 7, Belgium
A. Lousse
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cureghem, Brussels 7, Belgium

Summary

Statistical analyses were carried out on the data obtained, under strictly controlled conditions in metabolism stalls, from 219 adult non-pregnant dry cows fed on seventyone different rations. The authors have calculated and studied the correlations between total water intake, faecal and urinary water losses, absorbed and available water, and the seventy-five other factors which were analysed in each of the seventy-one rations. Total water intake closely correlated with the dry-matter intake and also with the dry-matter content of the diet; forages with high moisture content enhance the total water intake which is also significantly correlated to the intake of nitrogen, fat and some mineral elements.

Total water intake closely correlated with the dry-matter intake and also with the dry-matter content of the diet; forages with high moisture content enhance the total water intake which is also significantly correlated to the intake of nitrogen, fat and some mineral elements.

Faecal water losses are strongly correlated with the dry-matter intake and on the faecal dry matter. Moisture content of the diet has no significant effect but increasing pentosans and crude-fibre intake enhance the losses.

Urinary water excretion is closely related to the amount of absorbed water and to the dry-matter content of the diet; a highly significant correlation also exists between urinary water and urinary nitrogen and potassium. The amount of water excreted in the urine may affect the utilization of digestible nitrogen and potassium.

Available water is increased logarithmically when total water intake rises arithmetically. Feeds with high moisture content thus enhance the amount of available water.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

A.R.C. (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, no. 2, Ruminants. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Mcgraham, N., Wainman, F. W. & Armstrong, D. G. (1959). Environmental tempera ture, energy metabolism and heat regulation in sheep. II. The partition of heat losses in closely clipped sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 52, 2540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bott, E., Denton, D. A. & Weller, S. (1965). Water drinking in sheep with oesophageal fistulae. J. Physiol., Lond. 176, 323–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calder, F. W., Nicholson, J. W. G. & Cunningham, H. M. (1964). Water restriction for sheep on pasture and rate of consumption with other feeds. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 44, 266–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, E. G. (1948). Calculs Statistiques pour Débutants. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Dorée, Ch. (1949). Les Méthodes de la Chimie de la Cellulose. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Evans, J. E. (1957). Water metabolism in the sheep. Nature, Lond. 180, 765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fister, H. J. (1950). Manual of Standardized Procedures for Spectrophototnetric Chemistry. New York: Standard Scientific Supply Corporation.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. (1968). The water intake of ewes. Br. J. Nutr. 22, 3343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
A.O.A.C. (1965). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1965). Washington: A.O.A.C.Google Scholar
Paquay, R., Lomba, F., Lousse, A. & Blenfet, V. (1969). Statistical research on the fate of dietary mineral elements in dry and lactating cows. V. Potassium. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 73, 445–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkin, Elmer (1966). Analytical Methods for Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry. Norwalk: Perkin Elmer.Google Scholar
Phillips, G. O. (1960). The relationship between water and food intakes of European and Zebu type steers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 54, 231–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritzman, E. G. & Benedict, F. G. (1929). Bull. New Hamps. agric. Exp. Stn, no. 240.Google Scholar
Ritzman, E.G. & Colovos, N. F. (1932). Bull. New Hamps. agric. Exp. Stn, no. 32.Google Scholar
Sykes, J. F. (1955). The Yearbook of Agriculture: Water, p. 14; Washington: The United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Thornton, R. F. & Yates, N. G. (1968). Some effects of water restriction on apparent digestibility and water excretion of cattle. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19, 665–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A. D. (1966). The tolerance of sheep to sodium chloride in food or drinking water. Aust. J. agric. Res. 17, 503–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winchester, C. F. & Morris, M. J. (1956). Water intake rates of cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 15, 722–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar