Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:29:14.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The self-selection of diet by pregnant ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. G. Gordon
Affiliation:
Bowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeenshire
D. E. Tribe
Affiliation:
Bowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeenshire

Extract

1. Eight Cheviot ewes, bearing twins, housed in individual pens, and given the choice of a protein concentrate, a carbohydrate concentrate, hay, minerals and water, failed to select a ration that allowed them to bear and rear strong healthy lambs.

2. Three ewes maintained under these conditions developed a condition resembling pregnancy toxaemia.

3. The amount of food eaten by each ewe decreased during the last few weeks of pregnancy, This is probably the reason for the disappointing performance of the ewes at lambing.

4. The possible influence on the behaviour of the ewes of the constant presence of food is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L. & Mitchell, H. H. (1948). J. Anim. Sci. 7, 351.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. H. H., Godden, W., Snook, L. C. & Thomson, W. (1938). J. Physiol. 94, 346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, A. H. H., Godden, W., Snook, L. C. & Thomson, W. (1939). J. Physiol. 97, 120.Google Scholar
Lepkovsky, S. (1948). Advances in Food Res. 1, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, W. & Fraser, A. H. H. (1939). Scot. J. Agric. 22, 71.Google Scholar
Thomson, A. M. & Thomson, W. (1949). Brit. J. Nutrit. 2, 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribe, D. E. (1950). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 5, 209.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1948). Bull. Minist. Agric Lond., 48, 8.Google Scholar