Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:27:31.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Problems of the transplantation of fertilized ova

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. F. Dowling
D. F. Dowling
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge, and Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The object of this investigation has been to advance knowledge of the methods necessary for the practical application of the transplantation of fertilized ova in cattle.

2. The induction of ovulation at any specific time can be produced by squeezing out the corpus luteum per rectum. Oestrus occurs from 2 to 4 days afterwards; this is accompanied by ovulation and the ova so produced are readily fertilized. The onset of oestrus after the expression of the corpus luteum is hastened by previous treatment with P.M.S.

3. The induction of multiple ovulations is necessary to produce an augmented supply of fertilized ova, but it is of primary importance that the ova so produced are fertilized, viable and capable of full development. Four methods of doing this have been tested.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , October 1949 , pp. 374 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E., Pratt, J. P., Newell, Q. U. & Bland, L. J. (1930). Contr. Embryol. Carneg. Instn, 22, 45.Google Scholar
Asdell, S. A. (1946). Patterns of Mammalian Reproduction. Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Asdell, S. A. (1948). Cornell Univ. Agr. Ext. Bull. no. 737.Google Scholar
Asdell, S. A. (1949). J. Dairy Sci. 32, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bledl, A., Peters, H. & Hofstätter, R. (1921). Z. Geburtsh. Gynaek. 84, 60.Google Scholar
Brewster, J. E., May, R. & Cole, C. L. (1940). Proc. Ainer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 33, 304.Google Scholar
Carrel, A. & Lindbergh, C. A. (1938). The Culture of Organs. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casida, L. E. (1946). In The Problem of Fertility, p. 49. Ed. by Engle, E. T.. Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Casida, L. E., Meyer, R. K., McShan, W. H. & Wisnioky, W. (1943). Amer. J. Vet. Res. 4, 76.Google Scholar
Casida, L. E., Nalbandov, A., McShan, W. H., Meyer, R. K. & Wisnicky, W. (1940). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 33, 302.Google Scholar
Chance, M. R. A., Rowlands, I. W. & Young, F. G. (1939). J. Endocrinol. 1, 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, M. C. (1947). Nature, Lond., 159, 602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, M. C. (1948a). Nature, Lond., 161, 978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, M. C. (1948b). J. Gen. Physiol. 31, 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, M. C. (1949). J. Gen. Physiol. 32, 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, H. H. (1937). Amer. J. Physiol. 119, 704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, E. T. (1927). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 25, 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, E. T. (1931). Endocrinology, 15, 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, H. M. & Simpson, M. E. (1940). Endocrinology, 27, 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folley, S. J. & Malpress, F. H. (1944). Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 132, 164.Google Scholar
Foster, M. A., Foster, R. C. & Hisaw, F. L. (1937). Endocrinology, 21, 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerasimova, A. A. (1938). Probl. Zivotn. no. 12, p. 126.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. J. & Laing, J. A. (1946). J. Anat., Lond., 80, 194.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1927). Reproduction in the Cow. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1930). Verh. d. I. Internal. Kaninchenzüchter Kongr., Leipzig, no. 56.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1946). In The Problem of Fertility, p. 60. Ed. by Engle, E. T.. Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1948). 1° Cong. Internal. Fisiopatol. d. Riprod. Anim. e d. Fecond. Artif., Milan.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1949). Personal communication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J., Edwards, J., Rowson, L. E. A. & Walton, A. (1947). The Artificial Insemination of Cattle. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. Jr. (1949a). Nature, Lond., 163, 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. Jr. (1949b). J. Agric. Sci. 39, 222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. Jr. & Bhattackarya, P. (1944). J. Agric. Sci. 34, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. Jr., Hammond, J. & Parkes, A. S. (1942). J. Agric. Sci. 32, 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heape, W. (1890). Proc. Roy. Soc. 48, 457.Google Scholar
Heape, W. (1897). Proc. Roy. Soc. 62, 178.Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. & Darke, S. J. (1948). Nature, Lond., 161, 768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, I. (1932). Z. Zücht. 24, 165.Google Scholar
Laing, J. A. (1945). J. Agric. Sci. 35, 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, W. H. & Gregory, P. W. (1929). Science, 69, 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lush, J. L. (1945). Animal Brceding Plans. Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A. (1942). Biol. Rev. 17, 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalbandov, A. & Casida, L. E. (1942). J. Animal Sci. 1, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkes, A. S. (1943). J. Endocrinol. 3, 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, W. E. & Dracy, A. E. (1949). Communication to Egg Transplantation Conference, San Antonio, Texas.Google Scholar
Phillips, P. H. & Lardy, H. A. (1940). J. Dairy Sci. 23, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pincus, G. (1936). The Eggs of Mammals. New York.Google Scholar
Pincus, G. (1939). J. Exp. Zool. 82, 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pincus, G. (1940). Anat. Rec. 77, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pincus, G. (1949). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Pincus, G. & Enzmann, E. V. (1934). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. Wash., 210, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, J. (1926). Arb. deutsch. Gesel. Zücht. no. 29. (Cited by Shrode, R. R. & Lush, J. L.Advances in Genetics. New York.)Google Scholar
Rowlands, I. W. & Williams, P. C. (1941). J. Endocrinol. 2, 380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowson, L. E. A. & Dowling, D. F. (1949). Vet. Rec. 61, 191.Google Scholar
Smith, P. E. & Engle, E. T. (1927). Amer. J. Anat. 40, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, W. (1949). Personal communication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squier, R. R. (1932). Contr. Embryol. Carneg. Instn, 23, 225.Google Scholar
Umbaugh, R. (1949). Communication to Egg Transplantation Conference, San Antonio, Texas.Google Scholar
Walton, A. (1942). Notes on Artificial Insemination of Sheep, Cattle and Horses. Holborn Instrument Co., London.Google Scholar
Zawadowsky, B. M. (1945). Regulating the Process of Reproduction in Animals. Moscow.Google Scholar
Zawadowsky, M. M. & Eskin, I. A. (1937). Bull. Biol. Méd. Exp., 4, 200. Cited from Anim. Breed. Abstr. 7, 122.Google Scholar
Zawadowsky, M. M., Eskin, I. A. & Orsjannikov, G. F. (1935). Trud. Dinam. Razvit., 9, 75. Cited from Anim. Breed. Abstr. 4, 37.Google Scholar