Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:25:00.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The mechanical analysis of soils: A report on the present position, and recommendations for a new official method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A Sub-Committee of the Agricultural Education Association
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the summer of 1923, the Agricultural Education Association appointed a sub-committee to report on the present position with regard to the mechanical analysis of soils. This committee has now reported to the Association, which has adopted its recommendation that the former Agricultural Education Association method(1) of sedimentation in a beaker shall be replaced by one depending on the depth concentration relationship in a settling suspension. The reasons for this recommendation and the experimental work on which it was based will be of interest and use to soil workers generally. The salient features of the report have therefore been presented in the present paper, and an appendix of methods has been added. The full details of the official method will be published in Agricultural Progress, the journal of the Agricultural Education Association.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , January 1926 , pp. 123 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)J. Agric. Sci. 1 (1906), 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)U.S. Bureau of Soils Bull. 24 (1904).Google Scholar
(3)Odén, . Int. Mitt. Bodenk. 5 (1915), 257; Proc. Roy. Soc. (Edin.), 36, III. (1916). 219; Trans. Faraday Soc. 17 (1922), 327.Google Scholar
(4)Wiegner, . Landw. Versuch. 91 (1918), 41.Google Scholar
(5)Coutts, and Crowther, . Trans. Faraday Soc. 21 (1925–1926), pt. 2.Google Scholar
(6)Robinson, . J. Agric. Sci. 12 (1922), 306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Jennings, , Thomas, and Gardner, . Soil Science, 14 (1922), 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Krauss, . Proc. 3rd Internat. Soil Congress (Prague) (1922). Int. Mitt. Bodenk. 13 (1923), 147.Google Scholar
(9)Beam, . Wellcome Tropical Research Lab. 4th Report (1911), p. 34. See also Joseph and Martin, J. Agric. Sci. 11 (1921), 293.Google Scholar
(10)Puri, , Crowther, and Keen, . J. Agric. Sci. 15 (1925), 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Robinson, . J. Agric. Sci. 12 (1922), 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Fry, . J. Agric. Res. 24 (1923), 879.Google Scholar
(13)Hendrick, and Newlands, . J. Agric. Sci. 15 (1925), 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Keen, and Haines, . J. Agric. Sci. 13 (1923), 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15)Robinson, . J. Agric. Sci. 14 (1924), 626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar