Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:34:38.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inheritance and breeding significance of two floral morphological traits in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

L. C. Emebiri
L. C. Emebiri
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, Obafemi Awolowo Universitylle-Ife, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Variations in floral morphology have been observed by most breeders involved in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walpers) improvement. Usually, the most successful pod set is achieved following hand pollination when plants with large flowers are used as female parents because these are easy to manipulate. In breeding work involving wide crosses, unconscious selection of female parents on the basis of flower size could lead to correlated changes in pod and seed characteristics which may or may not be desirable. This would depend on the heritability of flower size and its correlation with the pod and seed characteristics.

Type
Short Notes
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 112 , Issue 1 , February 1989 , pp. 137 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abernethy, R. H., Palmer, R. G., Shibles, R. & Anderson, I. C. (1977). Histological observations on abscissing and retained soybean flowers. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 57, 713–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antos, M. & Wiebold, W. J. (1984). Abscission, total soluble sugars, and starch profiles within a soybean canopy. Agronomy Journal 76, 715–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emebiri, L. C. (1988). Combining ability of cowpea (Vigna unguiculala (L.) Walp.) for some quantitative traits. M.Phil, thesis, Department of Plant Science, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-lfe, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Erskine, W. (1981). Heritability and combining ability of vegetative and phenological characters of winged bean (Psophocarpus letragonolobus (L.) D.C.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 503–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffing, B. (1956). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Australian Journal of Biological Science 9, 463–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lush, W. M. (1979). Floral morphology of wild and cultivated cowpeas. Economic Botany 33, 442–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaik, P. M. & Probst, A. H. (1958). Effects of some environmental factors on flower production and reproductive efficiency in soybeans. Agronomy Journal 50, 192–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, H. N. & Omran, A. O. (1986). Genetics of phenological and vegetative characters in winged bean (Psophocarpus telragonolobus (L.) D.C.). Tropical Agriculture 63, 185–190.Google Scholar
Warrag, M. O. & Hall, A. E. (1984). Reproductive responses of cowpea (Vigna unguiculala (L.) Walp.) to heat stress. 1. Responses to night air temperatures. Field Crops Research 8, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar