Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T03:03:10.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Graded levels of herringmeal to bacon pigs, effect on growth rate, feed efficiency and bacon quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. Laksesvela
Affiliation:
Herring Oil and Meal Industry Research (S.S.F.), Straumsgrend, Norway

Extract

1. The relationship between the level of feeding herringmeal and its effect on growth rate, feed efficiency and bacon quality has been examined in nine experiments, each consisting of three groups of seven (in one series six pigs). All experiments concerned herringmeal with about 7% petrol ether extracted fat, fed in combination with ground cereal grains and concentrates (Table 2).

2. Seven levels of feeding were tried. In the live weight period 20–30 kg they amounted to 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 12%, herringmeal respectively. Later the percentages were successively reduced as follows: in the period 30–50 kg live weight 3/4, in the period 50–65 kg 1/2 and in the period 65–80 1/4 of the original amounts. No herringmeal was fed from 80 to 90 kg when the pigs were slaughtered (Table 1).

3. Increased levels of herringmeal produced increased growth rate and also brought about an increased feed efficiency. Most of the response was obtained with moderate levels, i.e. additions starting with 6–8%. Higher levels exerted more total effect, but these further accelerations progressively lessened. For initial additions of 6% herringmeal the growth rate improved on an average estimated at 8% and the feed efficiency by 5% compared with the performances of the pigs on an all-vegetable control diet, whereas corresponding figures for initial additions of 12% were about 13 and 7, respectively. Lower levels proved of little benefit (Tables 3 and 4 and Figs. 1 and 2). Growth-promoting effect of levels of 6% or more proved significant.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Askøe, E. & Madsen, J. (1954). Acta Agric. Scand. 4, 266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breirem, K. (1951). Landbrukshøgskolens institutt for husdyrernœring og foringslœre, Særtrykk nr. 48.Google Scholar
Breirem, K. (1953). Rapport zur International Futtermitteltagung, Hamburg, August 1953. Sonderdruck N. 135, Landbrukshøgskolens Foringsforsøk.Google Scholar
Carpenter, K. J. (1951). Brit. J. Nutr. 5, 243.Google Scholar
Carpenter, K. J., Duckworth, J., Lucas, I. A. M., Shrimpton, D. H. & Walker, D. M. (1956). J. Agric. Sci. 47, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couch, J. R., Stelzner, H. D., Davies, R. F. & DeYoe, C. W. (1960). Feedst. 32, 13, 1.Google Scholar
Evans, R. E. (1952). J. Agric. Sci. 42, 438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husby, M. (1938). Beretning fra Landbrukshøgskolens Foringsforsøk, no. 44.Google Scholar
Hvidsten, H. & Husby, M. (1955). Beretning fra Landbrukshøgskolens Foringsforsøk, no. 77.Google Scholar
Isaachsen, H. & Ulvesli, O. (1926). Beretning fra Landbrukshøgskolens Foringsforsøk, no. 18.Google Scholar
Jespersen, J., Hansen, V. E. H. & Kristensen, R. C. (1953). Beretning fra forsøgslaboratoriet, no. 264.Google Scholar
Kirsch, W. (1959). Futter und Fütterung, 10, 96.Google Scholar
Krüger, L. & Hinrichsen, J. K. (1954 a). Züchtungskunde, 25, 141.Google Scholar
Krüger, L. & Hinbichsen, J. K. (1954 b). Züchtungskunde, 26, 13.Google Scholar
Laksesvela, B. (1958). Intern S.S.F.—rapport C, no. 55.Google Scholar
Laksesvela, B. (1960). J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 11, 128.Google Scholar
Morrison, F. B. (1948). Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf. Feed Manufact. 15.Google Scholar
Nehring, K. (1952). S.B. dtsch. Akad. Landw. wiss. Berl. Sitzungsberichte, Band I, Heft 11.Google Scholar
Nordfeldt, S. (1952). Statens Husdjursførsøk, Särtryck och førhandsmeddelande, no. 91.Google Scholar
Ouren, I. (1957). Universitetet i Bergen. Årbok 1957. Naturvitenskapelig rekke. no. 9.Google Scholar
van Albada, M., Ubbels, P., Dammers, J. & Frens, A. M. (1951). Versl. RijkslandbProefst., 's Grav. no. 58, 8.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. & Evans, R. E. (1951). J. Agric. Sci. 41, 102.Google Scholar