Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-07T05:32:44.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of sulphitation press mud and nitrogen fertilizer on biomass, nitrogen economy and plant composition in sugarcane and on soil chemical properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

N. P. S. Yaduvanshi  and
D. V. Yadav
N. P. S. Yaduvanshi
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow 226002, India
D. V. Yadav
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow 226002, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

On a clay loam soil, the cultivar Col 148, planted in spring 1987 at 57560 three-budded setts/ha received 0, 75, 100 and 150 kg N/ha and 0, 10, 20 and 30 t/ha fresh sulphitation press mud either separately or in combined applications, at 80% moisture. Separate applications of up to 150 kg N/ha and up to 30 t press mud/ha increased the cane biomass by 24·6% and 13·2%, respectively, whereas combined application increased it up to 38·1% more than in the control. A N concentration of 1·95–2·12% in the blades of leaves 3·6 from the top of the plant from tillering to the grand growth stage was necessary for maximum dry matter production. Sulphitation press mud enhanced uptake and availability of N and P to the crop and reduced soil pH. Application of 10 t press mud/ha saved 75 kg/ha of fertilizer N.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 114 , Issue 3 , June 1990 , pp. 259 - 263
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Jackson, M. L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi, India: Prentice-Hall of India, Private Limited.Google Scholar
Kanwar, J. S. & Chawla, V. K. (1963). Comparative study of the effect of gypsum and press mud on the physicochemical properties of saline-alkali soils. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, India 11, 95–106.Google Scholar
Kanwar, R. S. & Kapur, J. (1987). Direct and residual effect of sulphitation and carbonation press mud cakes on the yield, quality and nutrition of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum). Indian Sugar Crops Journal 13, 1–5.Google Scholar
Kanwar, R. S., Singh, N. & Kapur, J. (1987). Effect of sulphitation and carbonation press mud on the yield and quality of sugarcane. Indian Sugar Crops Journal 13, 17–20.Google Scholar
Khanna, S. S. & Yadav, D. V. (1979). Practical Manual for Introductory Courses in Soils. Hissar, India: Haryana Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Prasad, M. (1976). Response of sugarcane to filter press mud and N, P and K fertilisers. II. Effects on plant composition and soil chemical properties. Agronomy Journal 68, 543–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, K. D. N., Prasad, C. R. & Singh, Y. P. (1986). Comparative study of pyrites and sulphitation press mud on soil properties, yield and quality of sugarcane in calcareous saline-sodic soil of Bihar. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 34, 152–154.Google Scholar