Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:02:24.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of sward height on herbage intake and production of ewes of different rearing rank during lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. J. Parker  and
S. N. McCutcheon
W. J. Parker
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Horticultural Systems Management, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
S. N. McCutcheon
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Groups of six single- and six twin-rearing ewes were continuously stocked on five pastures with sward surface heights (SSHs) of 3·5, 5·0, 6·0, 7·0 and 8·5 cm from week l until week ll of lactation. Herbage intake, estimated from faecal chromium concentrations and the in vitro digestibility of herbage samples collected from oesophageal-fistulated wethers, was lowest on the 3·5 cm sward but was not significantly different between SSH treatments during weeks 5, 8 and 9 of lactation. Twin-rearing ewes consumed 0·9–17·6% more herbage than single-rearing ewes did. By week ll, ewe liveweights showed increases of 2–4 kg/ewe on all except the 3·5 cm sward, where the ewes lost a similar amount of liveweight. From week 4 of lactation, twin-rearing ewes had a lower body condition than ewes raising a single lamb on all except the 3·5 cm sward, where the body condition of both rearing ranks was similar. Lamb growth rates during the first 6 weeks were similar for each SSH treatment but from days 46–76 of lactation, lambs on the 5·0 cm and longer swards grew faster (240 g/day) than those on the 3·5 cm sward (197 g/day). Lamb weight on day 76 ranged from 21·5 kg on the 3·5 cm sward to 23·0 kg on the 5·0 cm sward, but was not significantly affected by SSH. Similarly, midside wool growth of ewes and lambs was not significantly influenced by SSH during the period of continuous stocking. The results indicate that farmers should aim to provide swards of 5–7 cm height during lactation to maximize production in both single- and twin-rearing ewes.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 118 , Issue 3 , June 1992 , pp. 383 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnicoat, C. R., Logan, A. G. & Grant, A. I. (1949). Milk secretion studies with New Zealand Romney ewes. Parts I and II. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 39, 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthram, G. T. (1986). Experimental techniques: the HFRO Sward Stick. Hill Farming Research Organisation, Biennial Report 1984–5, pp. 29–30.Google Scholar
Bigham, M. L., Sumner, R. M., Hawker, H. & Fitzgerald, J. M. (1983). Fleece tenderness – a review. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 43, 73–78.Google Scholar
Bircham, J. S. (1981). Herbage growth and utilisation under continuous stocking management. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Bircham, J. S. & Hodgson, J. (1983). The influence of sward condition on rates of herbage growth and senescence in mixed swards under continuous stocking management. Grass and Forage Science 38, 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, P. J., Fowler, D. G., Wysel, D. A. & White, D. H. (1989). Evaluation of a new technology when applied to sheep production systems. II. Real-time ultrasonic scanning of ewes in mid-pregnancy. Agricultural Systems 29, 287–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T. H. (1964). The early weaning of lambs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 63, 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, M. L. (1986). Pregnancy diagnosis of ewes using real time ultrasound imaging. Proceedings of the 16th Sheep and Beef Cattle Society of the New Zealand Veterinary Association, 105–108.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. A. (1978). Effect of pasture reserves and stocking rate on ewe and lamb performance from mid-pregnancy to weaning. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 40, 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, D. A. & Harris, P. S. (1985). Composition of the diet of sheep grazing swards of differing white clover content and spatial distribution. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, D. A. & Hodgson, J. (1986). Technique to estimate botanical composition of diet samples collected from oesophageal fistulates. Mimeograph, DSIR, Palmerston North.Google Scholar
Coop, I. E. & Drew, K. R. (1963). Maintenance and lactation requirements of grazing sheep. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 23, 53–61.Google Scholar
Coop, I. E., Clark, V. R. & Aaro, D. (1972). Nutrition of the ewe in early lactation. I. Lamb growth rate. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 15, 203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, J. L. (1979). Variation in wool growth with physiological state. In Physiological and Environmental Limitations to Wool Growth (Eds Black, J. & Reis, P.), pp. 79–98. Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Earle, D. F. & McGowan, A. A. (1979). Evaluation and calibration of an automated rising plate meter for estimating dry matter yield of pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 19, 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, K. J., Zirkler, K. & Costigan, P. (1988). Confirmation of release rate from CAPTEC chrome. Controlled Release: Science and Technology Seminar, Melbourne (05), pp. 20–21.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. G. & Wilkins, D. F. (1984). Diagnosis of pregnancy and number of foetuses with sheep by real-time ultrasonic imaging. I. Effects of number of foetuses, stages of gestation, operator and breed of ewe on accuracy of diagnosis. Livestock Production Science 11, 437–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrick, D. J. (1984). The potential benefits of knowing the pregnancy status of ewes. Pregnancy diagnosis and its benefits, Massey Farm Series No. 2, Masscy University, pp. 5–26.Google Scholar
Geenty, K G. & Sykes, A. R. (1986). Effect of herbage allowance during pregnancy and lactation on feed intake, milk production, body composition and energy utilisation of ewes at pasture. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 106, 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, M. J. & Treacher, T. T. (1976). The effect of herbage allowance on herbage intake and performance of lambs grazing perennial ryegrass and red clover swards. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, M. J. & Treacher, T. T. (1978). The effect of herbage allowance on herbage intake and performance of ewes and their twin lambs grazing perennial ryegrass. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, M. J. & Treacher, T. T. (1980). The effect of ewe body condition at lambing on the performance of ewes and their lambs at pasture. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 631–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, M. J., Treacher, T. T. & Shanmugalingam, V. S. (1981). Herbage intake and performance of grazing ewes and of their lambs when weaned at 6, 8, 10 or 14 weeks of age. Animal Production 33, 223–232.Google Scholar
Gill, J. L. & Hafs, H. D. (1971). Analysis of repeated measurements of animals. Journal of Animal Science 33, 331–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, S. A., Barthram, G. T., Torvell, L., King, J. &Smith, H. K. (1983). Sward management, lamina turnover and tiller population density in continuously stocked Lolium perenne-dominated swards. Grass and Forage Science 38, 333–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J., MacKie, C. K. & Parker, W. (1986). Sward surface heights for efficient grazing. Grass Farmer 24, 5–10.Google Scholar
Jefferies, B. C. (1961). Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasmanian Journal of Agriculture 32, 19–21.Google Scholar
Maxwell, T. J., Doney, J. M., Milne, J. A., Peart, J. N., Russel, A. J., Sibbald, A. R. & MacDonald, D. (1979). The effect of rearing type and prepartum nutrition on the intake and performance of lactating Greyface ewes at pasture. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwan, J. C., Mathieson, C. & Hawker, H. (1983). Date of lambing and sheep production during lactation in Southland. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 43, 45–48.Google Scholar
Milne, J. A., Maxwell, T. J. & Souter, W. (1981). Effects of supplementary feeding and herbage mass on the intake and performance of grazing ewes in early lactation. Animal Production 32, 185–195.Google Scholar
Newman, S-A. N. (1988). Genetic and environmental variation and genotype × environment interactions in New Zealand Romney sheep. PhD Thesis, Massey University.Google Scholar
Newton, J. E. & Orr, R. J. (1981). The intake of silage and grazed herbage by Masham ewes with single or twin lambs and its repeatability during pregnancy, lactation and after weaning. Animal Production 33, 121—127.Google Scholar
Norusis, M. J. (1985). Advanced Statistics Guide – SPSSX, pp. 9–72. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Orr, R. J., Parsons, A. J., Penning, P. D. & Treacher, T. T. (1990). Sward composition, animal performance and the potential production of grass/white clover swards continuously stocked with sheep. Grass and Forage Science 45, 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, M., O'Keefe, W. F. & Flynn, M. J. (1987). The value of pasture height in the measurement of dry matter yield. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 63–68.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B. & Ingleton, J. W. (1963). A study of food intake and production in grazing ewes. II. The interrelationships between food intake and productive output. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 61, 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, W. J. (1990). Application of intraruminal chromium controlled release capsules to the measurement of herbage intake of sheep at pasture. PhD Thesis, Massey University.Google Scholar
Parker, W. J., McCutcheon, S. N. & Carr, D. H. (1989). Effect of herbage type and level of intake on the release of chromic oxide from intraruminal controlled release capsules in sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 537–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. N. (1967). The effect of different levels of nutrition during late pregnancy on the subsequent milk production of Blackface ewes and on the growth of their lambs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 68, 368–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penning, P. D. & Gibb, M. J. (1979). The effect of milk intake on the intake of cut and grazed herbage by lambs. Animal Production 29, 53–67.Google Scholar
Penning, P. D. & Hooper, G. E. (1985). An evaluation of the use of short-term weight changes in grazing sheep for estimating herbage intake. Grass and Forage Science 40, 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penning, P. D., Hooper, G. E. & Treacher, T. T. (1986). The effect of herbage allowance on intake and performance of ewes suckling twin lambs. Grass and Forage Science 41, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purchas, R. W. & Beach, A. D. (1981). Between operator repeatability of fat depth measurements made on live sheep and lambs with an ultrasonic probe. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 9, 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattray, P. V. (1986). Feed requirements for maintenance, gain and production. In Sheep Production, Vol. 2: Feeding, Growth and Health (Eds McCutcheon, S., McDonald, M. & Wickham, G.), pp. 75–109. New Zealand Institute of Agricultural Science.Google Scholar
Raymond, W. F. & Minson, D. J. (1955). The use of chromic oxide for estimating the faecal production of grazing animals. Journal of the British Grassland Society 10, 282–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roughan, P. G. & Holland, R. (1977). Predicting in-vivo digestibilities of herbages by exhaustive enzymic hydrolysis of cell walls. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 1057–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, R. M. & Wickham, G. A. (1969). Some effects of an increased stocking level on wool growth. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 29, 208–217.Google Scholar