Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:20:55.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative rates of emergence and leaf appearance in wild oats (Avena fatua), winter barley (Hordeum sativum) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. D. Cousens ,
M. P. Johnson ,
S. E. Weaver ,
T. D. Martin  and
A. M. Blair
R. D. Cousens
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Long Ashton Research Station, Bristol, Avon BS18 9AF, UK
M. P. Johnson
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Long Ashton Research Station, Bristol, Avon BS18 9AF, UK
S. E. Weaver
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada, Research Station, Harrow, Ontario, N0R 1G0, Canada
T. D. Martin
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Brooms Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP28 6NP, UK
A. M. Blair
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Brooms Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP28 6NP, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Winter barley cv. Igri, winter wheat cv. Avalon and spring wild oats (Avena fatua) were studied in monocultures in pots and in the field. The field experiments were located near Bristol and Bury St Edmunds in 1988/89. Pot sowings were monthly, whereas there was a single sowing date for each of the two field locations. Base temperatures for emergence in pots were 2·2, 1·3 and 2·3 °C for barley, wheat and A. fatua respectively. Barley was consistently the fastest to emerge. Leaf number was strongly correlated with photothermal time from emergence, with barley producing leaves at the greatest rate. Base temperatures for leaf appearance were −6, −5 and −3 °C for barley, wheat and A. fatua respectively. The field studies confirmed the ranking of the species based on the pot experiments. Both a model based on photothermal time and one based on rate of change of daylength at emergence gave good descriptions of the data. It is argued that correlations of rates of development with individual environmental variables are not sufficient to deduce the underlying mechanisms.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 118 , Issue 2 , April 1992 , pp. 149 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angus, J. F., Cunningham, R. B., Moncur, M. W. & Mackenzie, D. H. (1980). Phasic development in field crops. 1. Thermal response in the seedling phase. Field Crops Research 3, 365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. K., Gallagher, J. N. & Monteith, J. L. (1980). Daylength change and leaf appearance in winter wheat. Plant, Cell and Environment 3, 285–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, W. & Moss, D. N. (1989). Daylength effect on leaf emergence and phyllochron in wheat and barley. Crop Science 29, 1021–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, W. & Moss, D. N. (1991). Phyllochron change in winter wheat with planting date and environmental changes. Agronomy Journal 83, 396–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousens, R. D., Weaver, S. E., Martin, T. D., Blair, A. M. & Wilson, J. (1991). Dynamics of competition between wild oats (Avena fatua L.) and winter cereals. Weed Research 31, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, M. D. & Murphy, K. J. (1983). Estimating the probability of applying herbicides at the correct growth stage from weather records. Aspects of Applied Biology 4, Influence of Environmental Factors on Herbicide Performance and Crop and Weed Biology, 521–530.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Quinantilla, J. L., Andujar, J. L. G. & Appleby, A. P. (1990). Characterization of the germination and emergence response to temperature and soil moisture of Avena fatua and A. sterilis. Weed Research 30, 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friesen, G. & Olson, P. J. (1953). The effect of 2,4-D on the developmental processes in barley and oats. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 33, 315–329.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. N. (1979). Field studies of cereal leaf growth. 1. Initiation and expansion in relation to temperature and ontogeny. Journal of Experimental Botany 30, 625–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, R. K. M. & Delecolle, R. (1989). The setting of rates of development of wheat plants at crop emergence: influence of the environment on rates of leaf appearance. Annals of Applied Biology 115, 333–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. & Perry, M. W. (1987). Leaf emergence rates of wheat in a mediterranean environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38, 455–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M., Appleyard, M. & Fellowes, G. (1982). Effect of sowing date on the temperature response of leaf emergence and leaf size in barley. Plant, Cell and Environment 5, 477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kropff, M. J. (1988). Modelling the effects of weeds on crop production. Weed Research 28, 465–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, J., Jupe, S., Milford, G. & Lawlor, D. (1990). Leaf growth, photosynthesis and respiration. Institute of Arable Crops Research, Report for 1989, pp. 62–63.Google Scholar
Masle, J., Doussinault, G., Farquhar, G. D. & Sun, B. (1989). Foliar stage in wheat correlates better to photothermal time than to thermal time. Plant, Cell and Environment 12, 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T., St. Remy, E. A. De, O'Sullivan, P. A., Dew, D. A. & Sharma, A. K. (1985). Influence of the relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua) on yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aeslivum). Weed Science 33, 498–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlychenko, T. K. & Harrington, J. B. (1934). Competitive efficiency of weeds and cereal crops. Canadian Journal of Research 10, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, N. C. B. (1978). Factors influencing the emergence and competition of Avena fatua L. with spring barley. PhD. thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Peters, N. C. B. & Wilson, B. J. (1983). Some studies on the competition between Avena fatua and spring barley. II. Variation of A. fatua emergence and development and its influence on crop yield. Weed Research 23, 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pozo, A. H. del, Garcia-Huidobro, J., Novoa, R. & Villaseca, S. (1987). Relationship of base temperature to development of spring wheat. Experimental Agriculture 23, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooney, J. M., Brain, P. & Loh, S. Y. (1989). The influence of temperature on leaf production and vegetative growth of Avena fatua. Annals of Botany 64, 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russelle, M. P. & Bolton, F. E. (1980). Soil temperature effects on winter wheat and winter barley emergence in the field. Agronomy Journal 72, 823–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurston, J. M. (1959). A comparative study of the growth of wild oats (Avena fatua L. and A. ludoviciana Dur.) and of cultivated cereals with varied nitrogen supply. Annals of Applied Biology 47, 716–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, S. E., Tan, C. S. & Brain, P. (1988). Effect of temperature and soil moisture on time of emergence of tomatoes and four weed species. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 68, 877–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, A. H., Bragg, P. L., Porter, J. R. & Rayner, J. H. (1984). A winter wheat crop simulation model without water or nutrient limitations. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B. J. (1982). Guide to the timing of chemical control of wild oats in wheat and barley. Australian Weeds 2, 34–35.Google Scholar