Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T09:19:25.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The utilization of Hyparrhenia veld for the nutrition of cattle in the dry season I. The effects of nitrogen fertilizers and mowing régimes on herbage yields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. A. Smith
C. A. Smith
Affiliation:
Central Research Station, Mazabuka, Northern Rhodesia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The potential herbage yield of Hyparrhenia veld under mowing and fertilizer managements was measured, as a part of the work to study the utilization of the natural grassland for the feeding of cattle in the dry season.

2. The uninterrupted seasonal pattern of herbage growth results in a relatively large yield of stemmy, low-quality fodder at the end of the growing season.

3. Cutting at simulated ‘silage’ and ‘hay’ stages of growth reduced herbage yields compared with one, end-of-season harvest, but because of increased leanness, the regrowth herbage had a higher crude-protein content.

4. The seasonal crude-protein yield was unaffected by mowing treatments, and a reduction in herbage yield was counterbalanced by an increase in percentage crude protein.

5. The use of nitrogenous fertilizers resulted in a large increase in both herbage yield and percentage crude protein. The calculated nitrogen recovery was approximately 40%.

6. There were no harmful effects on either veld vigour or botanical composition after 4 years of mowing and fertilizer treatments. The nitrogen fertilizer treatments alone showed a transient residual effect.

7. The practical bearing of the results is discussed briefly. Only a low-quality fodder can, in practice, be harvested from the natural grassland, unless nitrogen fertilizers are used.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , November 1961 , pp. 305 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ainslie, K. S. (1958). Shod. Agric. J. 55, 286.Google Scholar
Barnes, D. L. (1960). Rhod. Agric. J. 57, 451.Google Scholar
Brockington, N. R. (1960). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 15, 323.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. C. & Croft, A. G. (1958). Rhod. Agric. J. 55, 40.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. C. & Fokkema, K. (1960). Rhod. Agric. J. 97, 252.Google Scholar
Glover, J., Duthie, D. W. & Dougall, H. W. (1960). J. Agric. Sci. 55, 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husband, A. D. & Taylor, A. D. (1932). Rhod. Agric. J. 34, 717.Google Scholar
Kennan, T. C. D. (1956). Rhod. Agric. J. 53, 26.Google Scholar
Plowes, D. C. H. (1957). Rhod. Agric. J. 54, 33.Google Scholar
Rhodes, F. B. (1956). Rhod. Agric. J. 53, 969.Google Scholar
Smith, C. A. (1959). J. Agric. Sci. 52, 369.Google Scholar
Stent, H. B. (1933). 3rd Annu. Bull. N.R. Agric. Dept., 14.Google Scholar
Trapnell, C. G. (1932). 2nd Annu. Bull. N.R. Agric. Dept., 5.Google Scholar
Vorster, T. H. (1954). Rhod. Agric. J. 51, 428.Google Scholar
Walker, C. A. (1957). J. Agric. Sci. 49, 394.Google Scholar
Weinmann, H. (1948). Rhod. Agric. J. 45, 119.Google Scholar