Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:11:07.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The timing of nitrogen application for spring barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. L. Easson
D. L. Easson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Three experiments were carried out in which nitrogen was applied to spring barley (cv. Midas) either all in the seed bed or as a divided dressing with 10 or 25 kg/ha in the seed bed and 50 or 60 kg applied at emergence or 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 or 70 days after emergence. Applying part of the nitrogen as a top dressing up to 30 days after emergence and 50 days after emergence had no significant effects on the grain and straw yields respectively, compared with applying all the nitrogen in the seed bed. Grain yields were progressively reduced with top dressings from 40 days after emergence (first node stage) onwards. Applications at 60 or 70 days did not give more grain yield than the no-nitrogen control, but gave straw yields which were intermediate between the no-nitrogen and seed-bed nitrogen treatments. Top dressing at 40 days after emergence stimulated tiller survival but did not improve grain yield because there were fewer grains per ear. Thousand-grain weights were lowest with top dressings at 50 days after emergence and grain nitrogen increased progressively with delay in top dressings from 30 days after emergence onwards.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 102 , Issue 3 , June 1984 , pp. 673 - 678
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benzian, B. & Lane, P. (1982). Effects of husbandry treatments on nitrogen concentration of grain and related yields in winter wheat experiments made in South-East England. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 33, 1063–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, P. & Harris, P. B. (1974). The rate and time of application of nitrogen on continuous spring barley. Experimental Husbandry 27, 45–49.Google Scholar
Dale, J. E., Felippe, G. M. & Merriott, C. (1974). Analysis of the response of young barley seedlings to time of application of nitrogen. Annals of Botany 38, 575–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. N., Biscoe, P. V. & Scott, R. K. (1976). Barley and its environment. VI. Growth and development in relation to yield. Journal of Applied Ecology 13, 563–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, F. J. (1970). Lodging in cereals. Ph.D. thesis, The Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Suzuki, M. & MacLeod, L. B. (1977). Barley yields and tissue N, P and K with high-low N supply for different growth periods. Agronomy Journal 69, 695–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, F. V. & Cooke, G. W. (1958). Nitrogen fertilizers for spring barley and wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 50, 312–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A. & Williams, R. J. B. (1961). Applying nitrogen fertilizers for spring barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 56, 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages and cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar