Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:59:43.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Statistical analyses of some measurements of fertility in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. Goot
H. Goot
Affiliation:
Massey Agricultural College, University of New Zealand, Palmerston North, N.Z.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In dealing with fertility in sheep there are a number of initial difficulties. On the one hand, there is generally a lack of any uniform definition of such terms as ‘fertility’, ‘fecundity’ and ‘prolificacy’ (cf. Marshall & Hammond, 1947; Lush, 1938; Rice, 1942; Asdell, 1946; and others); on the other hand, investigators have been confronted with a real difficulty in procuring suitable information which would conform to the requirements of any single and adequate definition of fertility. Because of this, fertility figures have been calculated in different ways* and may differ by as much as 30%. The situation is at present so confused that reference to similar work, especially when the original papers are not available, or the terms not clearly denned, is often of dubious value if not altogether misleading. In the past the data analysed were mostly based on farmers' answers to questionnaires or on flock records. The limitations of such methods are only too obvious; yet it must be clearly realized that in commercial flocks there is no possibility of any basic departure from them, even though their accuracy could in many cases be improved. In other words, only such information is collected as the circumstances allow. This, for instance, may be the number of lambs docked per ewes put to ram in one flock and number of lambs docked per ewes lambed in another.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 41 , Issue 1-2 , January 1951 , pp. 1 - 5
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Asdell, S. A. (1946). Patterns of Mammalian Reproduction. Ithaca, N.Y.: Comstook Publ. Co. Inc.Google Scholar
Goot, H. (1946). N.Z.J. Sci. Tech. 28 (Sec. A), 80–2.Google Scholar
Goot, H. (1950). In preparation.Google Scholar
Heape, W. (1899). J. R. Agric. Soc. 10, 217–48.Google Scholar
Lush, , Jay, L. (1938). Animal Breeding Plans. Ames, Iowa: Collegiate Press Inc.Google Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A. & Hammond, J. (1947). Bull. Minist. Agric, Lond., no. 39.Google Scholar
Nichols, G. E. (1926). J. Agric. Sci. 16, 365–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, V. A. (1942). Breeding and Improvement of Farm Animals. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc.Google Scholar
Terrill, C. E. (1949). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Turner, H. N. (1950). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Whatley, G. A. (1941). Res. Item No. 22, Iowa.Google Scholar
Winters, L. M., Dailey, D. L., Kiser, O. M., Jordan, P. S., Hodgson, R. E. & Green, W. W. (1946). Tech. Bull. Minn. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 174.Google Scholar