Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:10:18.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sources of variation in the fertility of a herd of zebu, British, and zebu × British cattle in Northern Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. M. Seebeck
R. M. Seebeck
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O. Division of Animal Genetics, Cattle Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 542, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Results of matings made in the Belmont breeding programme from 1954 to 1968 have been analysed. The analysis has been made within three groups. (1) The foundation cows in the years 1954–9; (2) the F1 generation which were mated within line in the years 1957–62; (3) the F2 and F3 generations which were mated within Africander cross (AX), Brahman cross (BX) and Shorthorn-Hereford (SH) lines in the years 1960–8. Fertility was based on the number of calves born, whether alive or dead, to the number of cows mated.

In the foundation cows, Hereford cows had a fertility 9% higher than the Shorthorns. The difference between the bull breeds was not significant although the mean for the Brahman bulls was 16% below the mean of the other three breeds. There was a large variation in the fertility of the Brahman bulls. The fertility of the Shorthorn cows was depressed (by 8%) in the lactating cows as compared with dry cows, while there was an opposite effect in the Herefords. These latter effects showed year to year variation.

In the F1 generation the differences between the breeds were not significant although both the AX (76·4%) and the BX (81·2%) were more fertile than the SH (70·1%). Estimates of heterosis in the F1 generation were 42% for the AX, 43% for the BX and 12% for the SH. Lactating cows were 7% more fertile than non-lactating cows. There were significant differences between the BX bulls used but not between bulls of the other two breeds. The effect of sires within breed on fertility of daughters was significant only within the SH, and the heritabilities of fortuity were estimated from the variance components for sires within breed to be 9%, 14% and 22% for AX, BX and SH respectively.

In the F2 and F3 data the breeds were significantly different in fertility with averages of 77%, 61% and 67% for AX, BX and SH respectively. Thus by comparison with the fertilities of the F1 cows no loss of heterosis for fertility occurred in the AX, a very marked loss in the BX and only a slight loss in the SH. A significant interaction between age of cow and lactational status showed that in the mature cows, wet cows had a higher fertility than dry, while the converse applied in the 3-year-old cows. The interaction of lactational status with breed consisted of the wet zebu cross cattle having a relatively low fertility while the wet British cattle had a relatively high fertility. There were significant differences between bulls within each of the three breeds. The effect of sires was significant in the BX and SH. Heritabilities estimated from between sires within breeds variance components were – 12%, 22% and 25% for the AX, BX and SH respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 81 , Issue 2 , October 1973 , pp. 253 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, A. A. (1969). Post-partum anoestrus in cattle. Aust. vet. J. 45, 180–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bliss, C. I. (1935). The calculation of the dosage mortality curve. Ann. Appl. Biol. 22, 134–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deese, R. E. (1965). A genetic evaluation of fertility and pre-weaning growth rate in Brahman and crossbred cattle. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Dempster, E. R. & Lerner, I. M. (1950). Heritability of threshold characters. Genetics 35, 212–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donaldson, L. E. (1971). Investigations into the fertility of Brahman crossbred female cattle in Queensland. Aust. vet. J. 47, 264–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falconer, D. S. (1960). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Frisch, J. E. (1973). Comparative mortality rates of Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle in Central Queensland. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Busb. 13, 127–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, W. R. (1960). Least Squares Analysis of Data with Unequal Subclass Numbers. U.S.D.A. Agricultural Research Service Publication no. 20–8.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. F. & Turner, H. G. (1959). A project on genetics of adaptation in cattle. C.S.I.R.O. Division of Animal Health and Production, Divisional Report, no. 8, (series S.W.-3).Google Scholar
Lampkin, G. H. & Kennedy, J. F. (1965). Some observations on reproduction, weight change under lactation stress and the mothering ability of British and crossbred Zebu cattle in the tropics. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 64, 407–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lush, J. L., Lamoreux, W. F. & Hazel, L. N. (1948). The heritability of resistance to death in the fowl. Poult. Sci. 27, 375–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, W. L., Derouen, T. M., Meyerhoeffer, D. C. & Bellows, R. A. (1971). Effect of percentage Zebu breeding, inbreeding and weight at different periods on calving percent of Brangus and Africander-Angus heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 32, 500–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling, P. E. & England, N. C. (1968). Some factors affecting reproduction in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 27, 1363–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temple, R. S. (1967). Reproductive performance in the South. In Factors Affecting Calf Crop, ed. Cunha, T. J., Warnick, A. C. and Koger, M.. Gainsville, U.S.A.: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Turner, J. W., Farthing, B. R. & Robertson, G. L. (1968). Heterosis in reproductive performance of beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 27, 336–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Vleck, L. D. (1972). Estimation of heritability of threshold characters. J. Dairy Sci. 55, 218–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar