Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:07:15.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plant development and grain yield in spring and winter barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. P. Ellis  and
G. Russell
R. P. Ellis
Affiliation:
Scottish Crop Research Institute, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9RF
G. Russell
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The development of spring and winter barley sown in both the spring and autumn has been followed in two seasons. The rates of development were similar in both types for autumn sowings but the spring types developed faster in spring sowings. Differences in the rate of development were related to photoperiod and temperature although soil water stress modified variety response. Yields were higher from autumn and early spring sowings. Sowing in April resulted in a considerable reduction in yield. The significance of these results for barley breeders is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 102 , Issue 1 , February 1984 , pp. 85 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleyard, M., Kirby, E. J. M. & Fellowes, G. (1982). Relationships between the duration of phases in the pre-anthesis life cycle of spring barley. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 33, 917–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspinall, D. (1966). Effects of daylength and light intensity on growth of barley. IV. Genetically controlled variation in response to photoperiod. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 19, 519–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, R. B. & Blackwell, R. D. (1980). Edge and neighbour effects in cereal yield trials. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 731–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. W., Gallagher, J. N. & Monteith, J. L. (1980). Daylength change and leaf appearance in winter wheat. Plant, Cell and Environment 3, 287–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. P. & Kirby, E. J. M. (1980). A comparison of spring barley grown in England and in Scotland. 2. Yield and its components. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. N. (1979). Field studies of cereal leaf growth. I. Initiation and expansion in relation to ontogeny. Journal of Experimental Botany 30, 625–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. N., Biscoe, P. V. & Scott, R. K. (1975). Barley and its environment. V. Stability of grain weight. Journal of Applied Ecology 12, 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, G., Kirby, E. J. M. & Roffey, A. P. (1976). Selection for developmental responses in winter barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 591–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keisling, T. C. (1982). Calculations of the length of day Agronomy Journal 74, 758–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. & Appleyard, M. (1980). Effects of photoperiod on the relationship between development and yield per plant of a range of spring barley varieties. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzuchtung 85, 226–239.Google Scholar
Kirby, E.J. M., Appleyard, M. & Fellowes, G. (1982). Effect of sowing date on the temperature response of leaf emergence and leaf size in barley. Plant, Cell and Environment 5, 477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. & Ellis, R. P. (1980). A comparison of spring barley grown in England and in Scotland. 1. Shoot apex development. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, R. J. (1963). Smithsonian Meteorological Tables. Washington D.C.: The Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Macaulay Institute For Soil Research (1971). Soil Survey of Scotland, Systematic Soil Survey Sheet 24/32.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food (1967). Technical Bulletin No. 16. Potential transpiration. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Puri, Y. F., Qualset, C. O. & Williams, W. A. (1982). Evaluation of yield components as selection criteria in barley. Crop Science 22, 927–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, G., Ellis, R. P., Brown, J., Milbourn, G. M.Hayter, A. M. (1982). The development and yield of autumn- and spring-sown barley in south east Scotland. Annals of Applied Biology 100, 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, W. J. & Matthews, S. (1982). The effect of daylength and sowing date on ear development in barley cultivars. In Barley Genetics, IV. Proceedings of the IVth International Barley Genetics Symposium, Edinburgh, pp. 518–526.Google Scholar
Tottman, D. R., Makepeace, R. J. & Broad, H. (1979). An explanation of the decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, with illustrations. Annals of Biology 93, 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vince-Prue, D. & Cockshull, K. E. (1981). Photoperiodism and crop production. In Physiologic Processes Limiting Plant Productivity (ed. Johnson, C. B.), pp. 175–197. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasuda, S. (1982). The physiology of earliness in barley. In Barley Genetics, IV. Proceedings of the IVth International Barley Genetics Symposium, Edinburgh, pp. 507–517.Google Scholar