Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:24:01.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moisture transport under cyclic trickle irrigations in different textured soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Pal ,
H. S. Sen ,
N. B. Dash  and
B. K. Bandyopadhyay
D. Pal
Affiliation:
Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Canning Town, South 24 Parganas, West Bengal 743329, India
H. S. Sen
Affiliation:
Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Canning Town, South 24 Parganas, West Bengal 743329, India
N. B. Dash
Affiliation:
Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Canning Town, South 24 Parganas, West Bengal 743329, India
B. K. Bandyopadhyay
Affiliation:
Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Canning Town, South 24 Parganas, West Bengal 743329, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Moisture movement through soil under trickle irrigation was studied in the laboratory at the Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, West Bengal, in 1988/89. Using a cylindrical flow model, the finite difference technique was used to compute the 2-dimensional moisture distributions and wetting front advancements in soils with clay contents ranging from 22·1 to 51·8%. Seven-day cyclic irrigations, each day having one on-cycle (infiltration) with a constant trickle discharge of 0·3 litre/h for 12 h and one off-cycle (redistribution) for 12 h, were used with two water qualities, EC 0·15 and 0·64 S/m. Moisture distributions were measured in artificially packed soil columns 60 cm high and 56 cm in diameter. The degree of agreement between the theoretical and observed values was expressed by Relative Error Percent (REP), defined as the difference between the two, divided by the observed value and expressed as a percentage. The mean REP ranged from 0 to 30, 62·5% of the values falling in the range 0–10, 22·5% from 10 to 20, and 15% from 20 to 30, irrespective of soil texture, water salinity or the irrigation cycle used. It was concluded that the theoretical data closely matched the experimental results. The wetting front in the soil columns was defined as the minimum detectable increase in moisture (10-3 cc/cc) from the initial content, and its advancement was calculated over the entire period of on-off cycles. This model was also used to calculate, for one soil, the theoretical moisture distribution under trickle irrigation with simultaneous loss by evaporation, which is an essential component of field moisture balance.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 118 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 109 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, C. F. & Wilson, T. V. (1982). Moisture distribution in stratified soils under a trickle source. American Society of Agricultural Engineering, Paper No. 82–2061.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, B. & Sheikholslami, M. R. (1976). Distribution of water and ions in soils irrigated and fertilized from a trickle source. Soil Science Society of America Journal 40, 575–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Asher, J., Lomen, D. O. & Warrick, A. W. (1978). Linear and nonlinear models of infiltration from a point source. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42, 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, A., Bresler, E., Diner, N., Ben-Asher, I., Heller, J. & Goldberg, D. (1971). Infiltration from a trickle source. I. Mathematical models. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 35, 675–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresler, E., Heller, J., Diner, N., Ben-Asher, I., Brandt, A. & Goldberg, D. (1971). Infiltration from a trickle source. II. Experimental data and theoretical predictions. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 35, 683–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresler, E., McNeal, B. L. & Carter, D. L. (1982). Saline and Sodic Soils. Principles – Dynamics – Modeling. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, R. R. & Klute, A. (1956). The measurement of soil moisture diffusivity. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 20, 458–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clothier, B. E. & Scotter, D. R. (1982). Constant-flux infiltration from a hemispherical cavity. Soil Science Society of America Journal 46, 696–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clothier, R. B., Scotter, D. R. & Harper, E. (1985). Three-dimensional infiltration and trickle irrigation. American Society of Agricultural Engineering 28, 497–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, P. R. (1956). Report of the committee on physical analyses, 1954–55. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 20, 167–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, W. R. (1958). Some steady-state solutions of the unsaturated moisture flow equation with application to evaporation from a water table. Soil Science 85, 228–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, S. D., Raats, P. A. C. & Dirksen, C. (1978). Laterally confined flow from a point source at the surface of an inhomogeneous soil column. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42, 851–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taghavi, S. A., Marino, M. A. & Rolston, D. E. (1984). Infiltration from a trickle irrigation source. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 110, 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taghavi, S. A., Marino, M. A. & Rolston, D. E. (1985). Infiltration from a trickle source in a heterogeneous soil medium. Journal of Hydrology 78, 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Der Ploeg, R. R. & Benecke, P. (1974). Unsteady, unsaturated n-dimensional moisture flow in soil. A computer simulation program. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 38, 881–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Genuchten, M. T. (1978). Numerical solution of the one-dimensional saturated-unsaturated flow equation. Water Resource Program Research Report No. 78-WR-09. Princeton, NJ, USA: Division of Civil Engineering, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Warrick, A. W. (1974). Time-dependent linearized infiltration. I. Point sources. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 38, 383–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, T. & Cho, T. (1978). Two-dimensional infiltration from a trickle source into dune sand in the case of a trickle irrigation method. Report of Arid Land Information Centre. Tucson, Arizona, USA: University of Arizona.Google Scholar