Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:35:47.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The lactation performance of red deer on hill and improved species pastures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. S. I. Loudon ,
A. D. Darroch  and
J. A. Milne
A. S. I. Loudon
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0PY
A. D. Darroch
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0PY
J. A. Milne
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0PY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Three groups of red deer hinds of 9–10 years of age were grazed upon an indigenous hill pasture (A), an improved species grass sward (predominantly perennial ryegrass) maintained at < 1500 kg D.M./ha (B), and one maintained at 2000 kg D.M./ha (C) from immediately after calving on 29 May until weaning on 22 September. Numbers of hinds in each treatment were 8, 6 and 9 respectively. Milk yields of hinds were estimated on swards A and C by the calf-suckling technique and hind and calf live-weight changes and hind grazing behaviour were recorded on all three swards during lactation.

Hinds on award C yielded on average 60% more milk over the lactation period than hinds on sward A, day 40 yields being 2·2 and 1·5 kg/day respectively. Calf growth rates (treatment A, 257 ± 9·5, B, 324 ± 12·1 and C, 369 ± 14·5 g/day) were higher on the improved species sward than on the hill sward and higher on the improved sward with the greater herbage mass. On treatments A and C calf growth rates were significantly (P < 0·05, r = 0·69) correlated with milk yield throughout lactation. At weaning, calves on sward C were 7·5 and 4·5 kg heavier than those on swards A and B respectively. Biting rates were lower (33 v. 56 bites/min) and grazing times higher (11.7 v. 6.0 h) on sward A than swards B and C. The poorer performance of hinds and their calves on sward A was considered to be due to a lower quality of diet ingested, and to behavioural limitations on intake occurring when hinds graze indigenous swards of relatively high species diversity. These results are discussed in relation to the grazing behaviour of cattle and sheep on similar swards.

The significance of the results to red deer farming in the U.K. is briefly discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 102 , Issue 1 , February 1984 , pp. 149 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R. H. & McGowan, M. (1966). The routine determination of in vitro digestibility of organic matter in forages – an investigation of the problems associated with continuous large-scale operation. Journal of the British Grassland Society 21, 140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allden, W. G. & Whittaker, I. A. McD. (1970). The determinants of herbage intake by grazing sheep: the interrelationship of factors influencing herbage intake and availability. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 755–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arman, P., Kay, R. N. B., Good All, G. D. & Sharman, G. A. M. (1974). The composition and yield of milk from captive red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 37, 67–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L., Boyne, A. W. & Hamilton, W. J. (1981). Reproduction in farmed red deer. 3. Hind growth and mortality. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Hamilton, W. J. (1980). Reproduction in farmed red deer. 2. Calf growth and mortality. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Kay, R. N. B., Sharman, G. A. M., Cunningham, J. M. M. & Hamilton, W. J. (1974). Farming the Red Deer. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Broster, V. J. & Smith, T. (1969). Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer. 8. Effect on milk production of level of feeding at two stages of lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 72, 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bubenik, A. B. (1965). Beitrag zur Geburtskunde und zu den Mutter-kind-Beziehungen des Res (Capreolus capreolus L.) und Rotwildes (Cervus elaphui L). Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 30, 65.Google Scholar
Chambers, A. R. M., Hodgson, J. & Milne, J. A. (1981). The development and use of equipment for the automatic recording of ingestive behaviour in sheep and cattle. Grass and Forage Science 36, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H., Guiness, F. E. & Albon, S. D. (1982). In Red Deer: The Ecology of Two Sexes. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Doney, J. M., Peart, J. N. & Smith, W. F. (1981). The effect of interaction of ewe and lamb genotype on milk production of ewes and of growth of lambs to weaning. Animal Production 33, 137–142.Google Scholar
Doney, J. M., Peart, J. N., Smith, W. F. & Sim, D. A. (1983). Lactation performance, herbage intake end lamb growth of Scottish Blackface and East Friesland × SBF ewes grazing hill and improved pasture. Animal Production (in the Press).Google Scholar
Drew, K. R. (1976). The farming of Ied deer in New Zealand. World Review of Animal Production 12, 49–60.Google Scholar
Forbes, T. D. A. (1982). Ingestive behaviour and diet selection in grazing cattle and sheep. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Grant, S. A., Hamilton, W. J. & Souter, C. (1981). The responses of heather-dominated vegetation in north-east Scotland to grazing by red deer. Journal of Applied Ecology 69, 189–204.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. J. & Blaxter, K. L. (1980). Reproduction in farmed red deer. 1. Hind and stag fertility. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. & Milne, J. A. (1978). The influence of weight of herbage per unit area and per animal upon the grazing behaviour of sheep. Proceedings of the 1th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation 1978 Ghent, pp. 4·31 4·38.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. F. (1962). Hill sheep and their pasture: a study of sheep grazing in south-east Scotland. Journal of Ecology 50, 651–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, R. W. & Drew, K. R. (1976). Shelter-seeking and suckling behaviour of the red deer calf (Cervus elaphus) in a farmed situation. Applied Animal Ethology 2, 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kryzwinski, A., Krywinska, K., Kisza, J., Roskosz, A., & Kruk, A. (1981). Milk consumption, lactation and the artificial rearing of red deer. Acta Theriologica 25, 341–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loudon, A. S. I. & Kay, R. N. B. (1983). Lactational constraints on a seasonally breeding mammal: the red deer. In Physiological Strategies in Lactation (ed. Peaker, M., Vernon, R. G. and Knight, C. H.), Symposium, Zoological Society. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Loudon, A.S.I., McNeilly, A. S. & Milne, J. A. (1983). Nutrition, milk yield and suckling behaviour in red deer: implications for lactational control of fertility. Nature, London 302, 145–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Scott, N. A. & Somerville, S. H. (1976). Condition scoring of cattle. East of Scotland College of Agriculture Bulletin No. 6.Google Scholar
Milne, J. A., Bagley, L. & Grant, S. A. (1979). Effect of season and level of grazing on the utilisation of heather by sheep. 2. Diet selection and intake by sheep. Grass and Forage Science 34, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, J. A., MacRae, J. C, Spence, A. M. & Wilson, A. M. & Wilson, S. (1978). A comparison of the voluntary intake and digestion of a range of forages at different times of the year by the sheep and the red deer (Cervus elaphus). British Journal of Nutrition 40, 347–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milne, J. A., Maxwell, T. J. & Souter, W. G. (1981). Effect of supplementary feeding and herbage mass on the intake and performance of grazing ewes in early lactation. Animal Production 32, 185–195.Google Scholar
Perrin, D. R. (1958). The calorific value of milk of different species. Journal of Dairy Research 25, 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saddleir, R. M. F. S. (1980). Energy and protein intake in relation to growth of suckling black-tailed deer fawns. Canadian Journal of Zoology 58, 1347–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staines, B. (1978). The dynamics and performance of a declining population of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Journal of Zoology 184, 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, B. R. (1971). Wild Reindeer activity, Hardangervidda, July-Dec. 1970. Report Norwegian I.B.P. Committee. Statens viltundersokelser, Direktoratetfor Jakt. Viltskell og Ferskvannsfiske, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudeli, J. & White, R. G. (1981). The effect of forage structure and availability on food intake, biting rate, bite size and daily foraging time of reindeer. Journal of Applied Ecology 18, 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R. G., Thomson, T., Skoeland, S. J., Person, D. E., Russel, D. E., Holleman, D. F. & Luick, J. R. (1975). Ecology of caribou at Prudhoe Bay, Alaska. In Ecological Investigations of Tundra Biome in the Prudhoe Bay Region (ed. Brown, J.), pp. 151–201. University of Alaska, Biol. Paper 2, Fairbanks.Google Scholar