Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:36:51.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Laboratory experiments on evaporation from fallow soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. L. Penman
Affiliation:
Soil Physics Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts

Extract

Experiments on evaporation from freely drained soils are described. Under isothermal conditions characteristic winter field behaviour is obtained, even when the air drying power is greater than its normal English midsummer value. Characteristic summer field behaviour is obtained when the rapid drying of a thin surface layer is achieved, either by using an extremely high air temperature under ‘isothermal’ conditions, or by raising the surface temperature by means of radiation—the normal method in nature. The effect of a high salt concentration in the soil water is shown to lead to greater evaporation losses and to a tendency for the salt to concentrate in the more salty patches.

It is suggested that mulching will only be beneficial during the isothermal part of the year, i.e. when soil surface and air temperature are approximately equal, and that it will have little effect on water conservation where the soil will be self mulched by the action of summer sunshine. The cause of this self-mulching action is briefly considered in the light of our limited knowledge of soil water dynamics; it appears to depend on the existence of a dual mechanism of water movement in soils—as liquid and as vapour—the rates of movement being very different functions of moisture content and moisture gradient.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Buckingham, E. (1907). Bull. U.S. Div. Soils, no. 38.Google Scholar
Hall, A. D. (1904). The Soil. London: Murray.Google Scholar
King, F. H. (18901891). 8th Ann. Rep. Agric. Exp. Stat. Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1940 a). Q. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 66, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1940 b). J. agric. Sci. 30, 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. & Schofield, R. K. (1941). J. agric. Sci. 31, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, R. W. (1940). Trans. Inst. Chem. Engrs, 18.Google Scholar
Schofield, R. K. (1935). Trans. Third Int. Congr. Soil Sci. 2, 37.Google Scholar
Shaw, C. F. (1929). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 21, 1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veihmeyer, F. J. (1927). Hilgardia, 2, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar