Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:05:14.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intercropping with pulses to concentrate nitrogen and sulphur in wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2007

M. J. GOODING ,
E. KASYANOVA ,
R. RUSKE ,
H. HAUGGAARD-NIELSEN ,
E. S. JENSEN ,
C. DAHLMANN ,
P. VON FRAGSTEIN ,
A. DIBET ,
G. CORRE-HELLOU  and
Y. CROZAT
...Show all authors
M. J. GOODING*
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University of Reading, Reading RG6 1AR, UK
E. KASYANOVA
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University of Reading, Reading RG6 1AR, UK
R. RUSKE
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University of Reading, Reading RG6 1AR, UK
H. HAUGGAARD-NIELSEN
Affiliation:
Risø National Laboratory, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
E. S. JENSEN
Affiliation:
Risø National Laboratory, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
C. DAHLMANN
Affiliation:
University of Kassel, D-37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
P. VON FRAGSTEIN
Affiliation:
University of Kassel, D-37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
A. DIBET
Affiliation:
Ecole Superieure Agriculture, F-49007 Angers, France
G. CORRE-HELLOU
Affiliation:
Ecole Superieure Agriculture, F-49007 Angers, France
Y. CROZAT
Affiliation:
Ecole Superieure Agriculture, F-49007 Angers, France
A. PRISTERI
Affiliation:
University Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria, I-80061 Gallina, Italy
M. ROMEO
Affiliation:
University Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria, I-80061 Gallina, Italy
M. MONTI
Affiliation:
University Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria, I-80061 Gallina, Italy
M. LAUNAY
Affiliation:
Unité Climat Sol et Environnement, INRA, Site Agroparc, 84914 Avignon Cedex 9, France
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of intercropping wheat with faba bean (Denmark, Germany, Italy and UK) and wheat with pea (France), in additive and replacement designs on grain nitrogen and sulphur concentrations were studied in field experiments in the 2002/03, 2003/04 and 2004/05 growing seasons. Intercropping wheat with grain legumes regularly increased the nitrogen concentration of the cereal grain, irrespective of design or location. Sulphur concentration of the cereal was also increased by intercropping, but less regularly and to a lesser extent compared with effects on nitrogen concentration. Nitrogen concentration (g/kg) in wheat additively intercropped with faba bean was increased by 8% across all sites (weighted for inverse of variance), but sulphur concentration was only increased by 4%, so N:S ratio was also increased by 4%. Intercropping wheat with grain legumes increased sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS)-sedimentation volume. The effect of intercropping on wheat nitrogen concentration was greatest when intercropping had the most deleterious effect on wheat yield and the least deleterious effect on pulse yield. Over all sites and seasons, and irrespective of whether the design was additive or replacement, increases in crude protein concentration in the wheat of 10 g/kg by intercropping with faba bean were associated with 25–30% yield reduction of the wheat, compared with sole-cropped wheat. It was concluded that the increase in protein concentration of wheat grain in intercrops could be of economic benefit when selling wheat for breadmaking, but only if the bean crop was also marketed effectively.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 145 , Issue 5 , October 2007 , pp. 469 - 479
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adeyemi, I. A. & Muller, H. G. (1983). Effects of disulphide cleaving reagents in the Zeleny sedimentation test. Journal of Cereal Science 1, 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AOAC International (2005). Official Method 992.23 Crude protein in cereal grains and oilseeds. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 18th edn (Eds Howtiz, W. & Latimer, G. W.). Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International.Google Scholar
Anon. (1991). Council Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 of 24 June 1991 on organic production of agricultural products and indications thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union L 198, 1–15.Google Scholar
Axford, D. W. E., McDermott, E. E. & Redman, D. G. (1979). Note on the sodium dodecyl sulphate test of breadmaking quality: comparison with Pelshenke and Zeleny tests. Cereal Chemistry 56, 582–584.Google Scholar
Berry, P. M., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Philipps, L., Hatch, D. J., Cuttle, S. P., Rayns, F. W. & Gosling, P. (2002). Is the productivity of organic farms restricted by supply of available nitrogen? Soil Use and Management 18 (Supplement), 248–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, J. A. & Payne, P. I. (1987). Grain quality. In Wheat Breeding: Its Scientific Basis (Lupton, F. G. H.), pp. 455–485. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Standards Institution (1990). Methods of Test for Cereals and Pulses. Determination of Protein Quality of Wheat by the Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate (SDS) Test BS 4317: Part 19. London: BSI British Standards.Google Scholar
Bulson, H. A. J., Snaydon, R. W. & Stopes, C. E. (1997). Effects of plant density on intercropped wheat and field beans in an organic farming system. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 128, 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. & Schofield, J. D. (1996). Effects of dough mixing and oxidising improvers on free reduced and free oxidised glutathione and protein–glutathione mixed disulphides of wheat flour. Zeitschrift fur Lebensmitteluntersuchung und Forschung A 203, 255–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, C., Jeuffroy, M. H., Laurent, F., Mangin, A. & Meynard, J. M. (2005). The assessment of AZODYN-ORG model for managing nitrogen fertilization of organic winter wheat. European Journal of Agronomy 23, 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, J., Olesen, J. E. & Askegaard, M. (2002). Sulphate leaching and sulphur balances of an organic cereal crop rotation on three Danish soils. European Journal of Agronomy 17, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghaley, B. B., Hauggard-Nielsen, H., Hogh-Jensen, H. & Jensen, E. S. (2005). Intercropping of wheat and pea as influenced by nitrogen fertilization. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 73, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooding, M. J., Davies, W. P., Thompson, A. J. & Smith, S. P. (1993). The challenge of achieving breadmaking quality in organic and low input wheat in the UK – a review. Aspects of Applied Biology 36, 189–198.Google Scholar
Gooding, M. J., Cannon, N. D., Thompson, A. J. & Davies, W. P. (1999). Quality and value of organic grain from contrasting breadmaking wheat varieties and near isogenic lines differing in dwarfing genes. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 16, 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooding, M. J., Ellis, R. H., Shewry, P. R. & Schofield, J. D. (2003) Effects of restricted water availability and increased temperature on the grain filling, drying and quality of winter wheat. Journal of Cereal Science 37, 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzys, S. & Aksomaitiene, R. (2005) Migration of sulphur in limed soils differing in agricultural management. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 71, 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Andersen, M. K., Jornsgaard, B. & Jensen, E. S. (2006). Density and relative frequency effects on competitive interactions and resource use in pea–barley intercrops. Field Crops Research 95, 256–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalenko, C. G. (2004). Response of forage grass to sulphur applications on coastal British Columbia soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 84, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, M. T., Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Jornsgard, B. & Jensen, E. S. (2004). Comparison of interspecific competition and N use in pea–barley, faba bean–barley and lupin–barley intercrops grown at two temperate locations. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 142, 617–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampkin, N. H., Measures, M. & Padel, S. (2004). Organic Farm Management Handbook, 6th edn. Aberystwyth, UK: University of Wales.Google Scholar
Peña, R. J., Trethowen, R., Pfieffer, W. H. & van Ginkel, M. (2002). Quality (end-use) improvement in wheat: compositional, genetic and environmental factors. Journal of Crop Production 5, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pristeri, A., Dahlmann, C., von Fragstein, P., Gooding, M. J., Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Kasyanova, E. & Monti, M. (2006). Yield performance of faba bean–wheat intercropping on spring and winter sowing in European organic farming systems. In Proceedings of the European Joint Organic Congress: Organic Farming and European Rural Development, Odense (DK), 30–31 May 2006 (Eds Andreasen, C. B., Elsgaard, L., Sørensen, L. S. & Hansen, G.), pp. 294–295. Tjele, Denmark: Danish Research Centre for Organic Food and Farming (DARCOF).Google Scholar
Shewry, P. R. & Halford, N. G. (2002). Cereal seed storage proteins: structures, properties and role in grain utilization. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 947–958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shewry, P. R. & Tatham, A. S. (1997). Disulphide bonds in wheat gluten proteins. Journal of Cereal Science 25, 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szumigalski, A. & Van Acker, R. (2005). Weed suppression and crop production in annual intercrops. Weed Science 53, 813–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woese, K., Lange, D., Boess, C. & Bögl, K. W. (1997). A comparison of organically and conventionally grown foods: results of a review of the relevant literature. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 74, 281–293.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, F. J., Withers, P. J. A., Evans, E. J., Monaghan, J., Salmon, S. E., Shewry, P. R. & McGrath, S. P. (1997). Sulphur nutrition: an important factor for the quality of wheat and rapeseed. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 43, 1137–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, F. J., Hawkesford, M. J. & McGrath, S. P. (1999). Sulphur assimilation and effects on yield and quality of wheat. Journal of Cereal Science 30, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar