Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:02:15.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Fungicidal Action of Bordeaux Mixtures.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. T. P. Barker  and
C. T. Gimingham
B. T. P. Barker
Affiliation:
National Fruit and Cider Institute, Long Ashton, Bristol
C. T. Gimingham
Affiliation:
University of Bristol.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The mixture of copper sulphate and lime universally known as Bordeaux mixture has been in common use as a fungicide in many countries for some time; but it is still uncertain by what means such a mixture, containing no soluble copper, is effective. It has undoubtedly a physiological effect upon plants on to which it is sprayed, and may increase their powers of resistance to the attack of parasites; but in addition to this, there appears to be a direct fungicidal action which requires explanation.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , May 1911 , pp. 76 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1911

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 77 note 1 Journ. Chem. Soc. XCI. 1907, 1988: 11th Rpt. Woburn Expt. Fruit Farm, 1910: Journ. Agric. Sci. III. 171.Google Scholar

page 77 note 2 Bull. No. 135, Univ. of Illinois Agric. Expt. Sta.

page 78 note 1 By the ferrocyanide colorimetric method.

page 79 note 1 Shewed signs of Bordeaux injury.

page 80 note 1 loc. cit.

page 82 note 1 Ber. deut. bot. Gesell. Bd. XI. 1893, p. 79 and Beitr. z. wiss . Bd. I. p. 81.Google Scholar

page 82 note 2 Arb. d. deut. landw. Gesell. 1894, Heft 2.

page 82 note 3 Ber. deut. bot. Gesell. 1894, p. 8.Google Scholar

page 82 note 4 U.S. Dept. Agr. Div. Veg. Phys. and Puth. Bull. 9, 1896.Google Scholar

page 82 note 5 Cent. für Bakt. Abth. 2, Bd. V. 1899.

page 83 note 1 Bot. Gaz. 33, No. 1, 1902.Google Scholar

page 83 note 2 Eleventh Rpt. Woburn Expt. Fruit Farm, 1910.

page 83 note 3 Landw. Jahrb. XXXIII. 517, 1904.Google Scholar

page 83 note 4 Univ. Illinois Agric. Expt. Sta. Bull. 135, 1909.

page 84 note 5 loc. cit.

page 90 note 1 Eleventh Rept. Woburn Expt. Fruit Farm, 1910.

page 91 note 1 “Rept. of Conference on the Fruit Trees,”journ. Roy. Hort. Soc. Vol. XXXIV. pt. III.Google Scholar

page 94 note 1 See this vol., preceding paper.