Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:47:23.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimates of the contribution of solar radiation to the thermal exchanges of sheep at a latitude of 55° north

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. L. Clapperton ,
J. P. Joyce  and
K. L. Blaxter
J. L. Clapperton
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
J. P. Joyce
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
K. L. Blaxter
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Interest in the gain of heat by farm animals exposed to sunshine has largely been confined to countries in which air temperatures are high and in which exposure of stock to sunshine leads to their distress. Riemerschmidt's (1943) studies indicated the considerable magnitude of the heat gained by oxen standing in the sun in South Africa, and studies by MacFarlane, Morris & Howard (1956) in Australia showed that with sheep standing in the sun the wool surface temperature could rise to 85° C. These studies of MacFarlane have been confirmed in Egypt by Eyal (1963), and were subject to a theoretical analysis by Priestley (1957). Such observations, together with earlier ones reviewed by Findlay (1958), show that in many equatorial regions solar radiation is a major factor accounting for heat stress in farm ruminants.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 64 , Issue 1 , February 1965 , pp. 37 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bemporad, A. (1907). Rend. Ace. Lincei., Roma, Ser. 5, 16, 66.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Joyce, J. P. (1963). Brit. J. Nutr. 17, 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Climatological Atlas of the British Isles (1952). London: H.M.S.O. p. 136.Google Scholar
Eyal, E. (1963). J. Agric. Sci. 60, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, J. D. (1958). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 17, 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (1948). Cleveland, Ohio: Chemical Rubber Publ. Corp., p. 264.Google Scholar
Handbook of Meteorological Instruments (1956). London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Kimball, H. H. (1930). Mon. Weath. Rev. 58, 43.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. H. K. (1950). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1, 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFarlane, W. V., Morris, R. J. & Howard, B. (1956). Nature, Lond., 178, 304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. (1927). Ann. Rep. U. Ill. Agric. Exp. Sta., p. 155.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L. (1959). J. Sci. Iustrum. 36, 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priestley, C. H. B. (1957). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 8, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riemerschmidt, G. (1943). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 18, 327.Google Scholar
Smithsonian Meteorological Tables (1951). 6th ed.Washington, D.C.Google Scholar