Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:16:09.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The efficiency of some experimental designs used in dairy husbandry experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. B. Taylor  and
P. J. Armstrong
W. B. Taylor
Affiliation:
Applied Mathematics Laboratory, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Zealand
P. J. Armstrong
Affiliation:
Applied Mathematics Laboratory, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Records for milk, fat, solids-not-fat and fat percentage over forty-eight complete lactations were used as uniformity data to determine the relative efficiencies of a variety of experimental designs used in dairy husbandry experiments.

In general, it was found that:

1. Experiments conducted during the earlier part of the lactation are more efficient than those conducted during the later part.

2. Three-weekly periods are generally more efficient than 5-weekly periods.

3. If 3-weekly periods are used, then extending the time of the experiment over four such periods instead of three reduces the error. The converse is the case with 5-weekly periods since the experiment is carried over into the highly variable later part of the lactation.

4. Grouping the animals according to the yields recorded during the first 40 days of lactation does not appear to reduce the error.

An analysis of covariance using the pro-experimental records of the performance of the animals has been carried out on ordinary group trials and it is hoped to publish the results at a later date, but investigations on the data have shown that both reversal and Latin square designs are more efficient than ordinary group trials even when such an analysis is performed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , October 1953 , pp. 407 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brandt, A. E. (1938). Tests of significance in reversal or switchback trials. Res. Bull. Ia St. Coll., no. 234.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G., Autrey, K. M. & Cannon, C. Y. (1941). J. Dairy Sci. 24, 937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, F. (1936 a). Ann. Eugen., Lond., 7, 124.Google Scholar
Yates, F. (1936 b). J. Agric. Sci. 26, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youden, W. J. (1937). Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 9, 41.Google Scholar