Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T08:54:40.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of soil compaction in potato (Solanum tuberosum) crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2007

M. A. STALHAM ,
E. J. ALLEN ,
A. B. ROSENFELD  and
F. X. HERRY
M. A. STALHAM*
Affiliation:
Cambridge University Farm, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0LH, UK
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Since many soils used for growing potatoes in the UK are likely to be close to their plastic limit for cultivation during early spring, there exists the potential for soil compaction to occur during planting which will restrict root penetration. A series of experiments showed that soil compaction delayed emergence, reduced rate of leaf appearance and ground cover expansion, shortened canopy cover duration and restricted light interception, which combined to reduce tuber yield. Rooting density and maximum depth of rooting were reduced, particularly where compaction was shallow. In some soils, irrigation helped alleviate some of the effects of compaction but in others it exacerbated their severity. Using a cone penetrometer, relationships between rate of root penetration and soil resistance (Ω) were established from a number of experiments and replicated blocks in commercial fields and an overall relationship of the form y=16·3–4·08Ω mm/day was produced. Root penetration rates of c. 20 mm/day were measured in the intensively-cultivated ridge zone but growth rates were halved at a Ω of 1·5 MPa. A survey of 602 commercial fields showed that two thirds of fields had Ωs ⩾3 MPa (where root growth rates would be <2 mm/day) within the top 0·55 m of the soil profile. Thus, rooting depth is likely to be considerably shallower than desirable and lead to inefficiency of water and nutrient utilization. The use of powered cultivators to separate stones and clods from beds or ridges and produce a fine seedbed is now almost universally adopted in the UK. However, the system is both time and energy inefficient and increases the risk of creating soil compaction, particularly at shallow depths. All cultivation equipment has been shown to cause compaction and it is suggested that the consequences of the shortening of the growing season from delaying planting by a few days to allow the soil to dry are far less than the yield and quality losses caused by compaction.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 145 , Issue 4 , August 2007 , pp. 295 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D. & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration – guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Allen, E. J., Allison, M. F. & Sparkes, D. L. (2005). Physiological and technological limits to yield improvement of potatoes. In Yields of Farmed Species: Constraints and Opportunities in the 21st Century (Eds Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Wiseman, J.), pp. 289–309. Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
Bengough, A. G. & McKenzie, B. M. (1997). Sloughing of root cap cells decreases the frictional resistance to maize (Zea mays L.) root growth. Journal of Experimental Botany 48, 885–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengough, A. G. & Mullins, C. E. (1988). Use of a low-friction penetrometer to estimate soil resistance to root growth. Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the International Soil Tillage Research Organisation 1, 1–6.Google Scholar
Bengough, A. G. & Young, I. M. (1993). Root elongation of seedling peas through layered soil of different penetration resistances. Plant and Soil 149, 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, J. C. & Grimes, D. W. (1978). Precision tillage effects on potato root and tuber production. American Potato Journal 55, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boone, F. R., Bouma, J. & De Smet, L. A. H. (1978). A case study on the effect of soil compaction on potato growth in a loamy sand soil. I. Physical measurements and rooting patterns. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 26, 405–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstall, L. & Harris, P. M. (1983). The estimation of percentage light interception from leaf area index and percentage ground cover in potatoes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 241–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eavis, B. W. (1967). Mechanical impedance to root growth. Agricultural Engineering Symposium, Silsoe, Paper 4/F/39, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Ehlers, W., Köpke, U., Hesse, F. & Böhm, W. (1983). Penetration resistance and root growth of oats in tilled and untilled loess soil. Soil and Tillage Research 3, 261–275.Google Scholar
Feddes, R. A., De Graff, M., Bouma, J. & Van Loon, C. D. (1988). Simulation of water use and production of potatoes as affected by soil compaction. Potato Research 31, 225–239.Google Scholar
Gooderham, P. T. (1973). Soil physical conditions and plant growth. PhD thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Gregory, P. J., McGowan, M., Biscoe, P. V. & Hunter, B. (1978). Water relations of winter wheat. 1. Growth of the root system. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, M. A. (1993). Russets on the beach. Proceedings of the 7th National Potato Research Workshop, Ulverstone, Tasmania, Australia, 1993, pp. 148–152.Google Scholar
Heap, M., McPharlin, I. & Stevens, R. (2001). Russets on the beach – revisited. Available online at http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au:82/pages/horticulture/pathology/hort_pn_russetsbeach.htm (verified 3/1/07).Google Scholar
Ibrahim, B. A. & Miller, D. E. (1989). Effect of subsoiling on yield and quality of corn and potato at two irrigation frequencies. Soil Science Society of America Journal 53, 247–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. L. (1981). Effect of date of planting on contrasting potato varieties. PhD thesis, University of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Loboski, C. A. M., Dowdy, R. H., Allmaras, R. R. & Lamb, J. A. (1998). Soil strength and water content influences on corn root distribution in a sandy soil. Plant and Soil 203, 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, M. J. & Soane, G. C. (1987). Crop and soil response to subsoil loosening, deep incorporation of phosphorus and potassium fertilizer and subsequent soil management on a range of soil types. Part 1: response of arable crops. Soil Use and Management 3, 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, B. a'B. (1971). Measurement of length in random arrangements of lines. Journal of Applied Ecology 8, 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, R. K., Dexter, A. R. & Alston, A. M. (1986). Penetration of soil aggregates of finite size. II. Plant roots. Plant and Soil 94, 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, E. I. (1966). A method of estimating the total length of root in a sample. Journal of Applied Ecology 3, 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, M. F. (1992). Deep loosening of clay loam subsoil in a moist climate and some effects of traffic management. Soil Use and Management 8, 60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, R. W., Baird, D. B., Cherry, M., Gilmour, A. R., Harding, S. A., Kane, A. F., Lane, P. W., Murray, D. A., Soutar, D. M., Thompson, R., Todd, A. D., Tunnicliffe, Wilson G., Webster, R. & Welham, S. J. (2002). Genstat™ Release 6.1 Reference Manual. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pierce, F. J. & Burpee, G. C. (1995). Zone tillage effects on soil properties and yield and quality of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). Soil and Tillage Research 35, 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, C. W. (1986). The effect of subsoiling and irrigation on potato production. Soil and Tillage Research 7, 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalham, M. A. & Allen, E. J. (2001). Effect of variety, irrigation regime and planting date on depth, rate, duration and density of root growth in the potato (Solanum tuberosum) crop. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 137, 251–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalham, M. A. & Allen, E. J. (2004). Water uptake in the potato (Solanum tuberosum) crop. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 142, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalham, M. A. & Allen, E. J. (2005). Effect of varying evaporative demand on the relationship between actual and potential evapotranspiration at different soil moisture deficits in potato (Solanum tuberosum) crops. Aspects of Applied Biology 76, 151–159.Google Scholar
Stalham, M. A., Allen, E. J. & Herry, F. X. (2005). A Review of the Effect of Soil Compaction on Potato Growth and its Alteration with Cultivation. Research Review Ref. R261. Oxford: British Potato Council.Google Scholar
Stolzy, L. H. & Barley, K. P. (1968). Mechanical resistance encountered by roots entering compact soils. Soil Science 105, 297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennant, D. (1975). A test of a modified line-intersect method of estimating root length. Journal of Ecology 63, 995–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timm, H. & Flocker, W. J. (1966). Responses of potato plants to fertilization and soil moisture tension under induced soil compaction. Agronomy Journal 58, 153–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Loon, C. D. & Bouma, J. (1978). A case study on the effect of soil compaction on potato growth in a loamy sand soil. 2. Potato plant responses. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 26, 421–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Loon, C. D., de Smet, L. A. H. & Boone, F. R. (1985). The effect of a ploughpan in marine loam soils on potato growth. 2. Potato plant responses. Potato Research 28, 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vepraskas, M. J. (1988). Bulk density values diagnostic of restricted root growth in coarse-textured soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52, 1117–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vepraskas, M. J. & Miner, G. S. (1986). Effects of subsoiling and mechanical impedance on tobacco root growth. Soil Science Society of America Journal 50, 423–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, G. M., Utomo, W. H. & Dexter, A. R. (1981). A comparison of penetrometer pressures and the pressures exerted by roots. Plant and Soil 61, 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, I. M., Bengough, A. G., Mackenzie, J. W. & Dickson, J. W. (1993). Differences in potato development (Solanum tuberosum cv. Maris Piper) in zero and conventional traffic treatments are related to soil physical conditions and radiation interception. Soil and Tillage Research 26, 341–359.Google Scholar