Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:06:47.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of sulphate of ammonia applications on the sulphur content of various grass and clover mixtures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. J. C. Jones
D. J. C. Jones
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Trawscoed, Aberystwyth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The effects of annual applications of 0–12 cwt. per acre of sulphate of ammonia on the herbage levels and yields of sulphate sulphur and total sulphur were investigated in four seeds mixtures 1 year and 4 years after seeding down.

2. There were significant increases in the levels and yields of both forms of sulphur up to the 2 or 4 cwt. per acre level of application in both years. The maximum values occurred at the 6 or 8 cwt. level and the corresponding values at the 12 cwt. per acre rate of application declined in many cases.

3. The cumulative effects of the annual dressings of sulphate of ammonia resulted in substantial increases of approximately 50% in the levels of sulphate sulphur and total sulphur with much smaller increases in the levels of non-sulphate sulphur.

4. Duplicate plots which received 2, 4 and 6 cwt. per acre of sulphate of ammonia also received an additional 2 cwt. per acre immediately after the first cut each year. This splitting of the dressings had no significant effect on the accumulation of sulphur by any seeds mixture. A second cut from the cocksfoot plots in the first year showed the sulphur levels in the plots which received the additional sulphate of ammonia to have increased less than the levels in those which received only the initial dressing. This was explained in terms of the yields of the components.

5. There was a tendency for the rye-grass mixture to contain more sulphate than the other mixtures particularly in the fourth year.

6. The possible significance of the increases found in sulphate levels in the copper-molybdenum metabolism of grazing animals is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , April 1960 , pp. 188 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aitken, H. A. A. (1930). Biochem. J. 24, 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allcroft, R. & Lewis, G. (1956). Proc. 7th Int. Grassl. Congr. p. 377.Google Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1950). Official Methods of Analysis, p. 104, 7th ed.Washington.Google Scholar
Askew, H. O. & Bishop, L. (1932). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 14, 23.Google Scholar
Bosch, S. (1954). European Grassland Conference. Project no. 224, p. 191.Google Scholar
Dick, A. T. (1953). Aust. Vet. J. 29, 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, A. T. (1954). Aust. Vet. J. 30, 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R. E. (1931). J. Agric. Sci. 21, 806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauge, S. M., Mertz, E. T., Kingsley, A. F. & Needham, J. W. (1950). Indiana Agric. Exp. Sta. Rep. 62, 101.Google Scholar
Little, R. C. (1958). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 9, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mylrea, P. J. (1958). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 9, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, T. W. & Adams, A. F. R. (1958). Plant & Soil, 9, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, T. W., Adams, A. F. R. & Orchiston, H. D. (1956). Plant & Soil, 7, 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. & Lloyd, J. R. (1952). N.A.A.S. Quart. Rev. 5, 271.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. & Evans, R. E. (1933). J. Agric. Sci. 23, 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar