Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:24:46.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of interval between harvests and nitrogen application on the proportion and yield of crop fractions in four ryegrass varieties in the first harvest year

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Wilman ,
D. Droushiotis ,
A. Koocheki ,
A. B. Lwoga  and
J. S. Shim
D. Wilman
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
D. Droushiotis
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
A. Koocheki
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
A. B. Lwoga
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
J. S. Shim
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of six intervals between harvests and three levels of N application on the proportion and yield of green leaf, dead leaf, ‘stem’ and inflorescence was studied in four ryegrass (Lolium) varieties during a 30-week period in the first harvest year in a field experiment. In one variety, S.23, the ‘stem’ was divided into true stem, leaf sheath, unemerged leaf and unemerged inflorescence.

There was a bigger yield of ‘stem’ and a bigger total herbage yield response to doubling the interval between harvests in S.321 and S.22 than in S.23 and S.24.

In the absence, but not generally in the presence, of applied N, S.321 outyielded the other varieties. S.24 was particularly responsive to applied N, especially in terms of green leaf yield.

There was a large positive effect on yield of doubling the interval (from 3, 4 or 5 weeks to 6, 8 or 10 weeks respectively) during the main period of stem development. During the subsequent period, however, doubling the interval produced very little extra yield of total herbage and reduced green leaf yield substantially.

The percentage increase in yield due to the application of N progressively decreased as the interval was increased.

Maximum net production of green leaf was obtained by harvesting every 4 or 5 weeks for most of the season, extending to 6 weeks at the end. Harvesting every 3 weeks, by comparison, resulted in a slightly lower annual green leaf yield, but with a distinctly higher proportion of green leaf in the crop.

Applied N generally had little effect on the proportion of crop fractions, but reduced the proportion of green leaf and increased that of' stem' in S.23 and S.24 at the August and September harvests.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 86 , Issue 1 , February 1976 , pp. 189 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Designs, 2nd edn, pp. 293–302. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. P. (1972). Forage production for cutting and conservation. In The Way Ahead in Plant Breeding. Proceedings of 6th Congress of Eucarpia, Cambridge, 1971 (ed. Lupton, F. G. H., Jenkins, G. and Johnson, R.), pp. 53–65.Google Scholar
Droushiotis, D. (1974). Aspects of the agronomy and botanical characteristics of Lolium multiflorum with reference to nitrogen supply and frequency of cutting. M.Sc. thesis, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Federation of Welsh Grassland Societies (1972). Newsletter, Oct. 1972.Google Scholar
Goodman, P. J. (1974). Selection for nutrient response and biochemical characteristics in Lolium. Proceedings XII International Grassland Congress, Moscow (in the Press).Google Scholar
Holliday, R. & Wilman, D. (1965). The effect of fertilizer nitrogen and frequency of defoliation on yield of grassland herbage. Journal of the British Grassland Society 20, 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, I. V. (1966). The effect of utilization of herbage on the response to fertilizer nitrogen. Proceedings IX International Grassland Congress, Sao Paulo, 1113–19.Google Scholar
Laredo, M. A. & Minson, D. J. (1975.) The voluntary intake and digestibility by sheep of leaf and stem fractions of Lolium perenne. Journal of the British Grassland Society 30, 73–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leafe, E. L. (1974). Botany Department report. Annual Report of the Grassland Research Institute for 1973, 31–6.Google Scholar
Leafe, E. L., Stiles, W. & Dickinson, S. E. (1974). Physiological processes influencing the pattern of productivity of the intensively managed grass sward. Proceedings XII International Grassland Congress, Moscow (in the Press).Google Scholar
Minderhoud, J. W., Van Burg, P. F. J., Deinuh, B., Dirven, J. G. P. & T'habt, M. L. (1974). Effects of high levels of nitrogen fertilization and adequate utilization on grassland productivity and cattle performance, with special reference to permanent pastures in the temperate regions. Proceedings XII International Grassland Congress, Moscow (in the Press).Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (1954). The calculation of irrigation need. Technical Bulletin No. 4, p. 15. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
National Institute of Agricultural Botany (1972–1973). Recommended varieties of grasses. Fanners leaflet No. 16. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Prine, G. M. & Burton, G. W. (1956). The effect of nitrogen rate and clipping frequency upon the yield, protein content and certain morphological characteristics of Coastal Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon (L) Pers.). Agronomy Journal 48, 296–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, W. F. (1969). The nutritive value of forage crops. Advances in Agronomy 21, 1–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudeforth, C. C. (1970). Soils of North Cardiganshire Harpenden: Soil Survey of England and Wales.Google Scholar
Shim, J. S. (1975). Leaf dimensions and productivity of varieties of Lolium perenne and Lolium mulliflorum in response to nitrogen supply and frequency of cutting. M.Sc. thesis, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Stapledon, R. G. (1924). The seasonal productivity of herbage grasses with particular reference to the influence of different systems of cutting on indigenous and non-indigenous strains respectively. Bulletin of Welsh Plant Breeding Station Series H, No. 3, 5–84.Google Scholar
Stapledon, R. G. & Jones, M. G. (1927). The sheep as a grazing animal and as an instrument for estimating the productivity of pastures. Bulletin of Welsh Plant Breeding Station Series H, No. 5, 42–54.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. & Deriaz, R. E. (1963). The use of rumen-fistulated steers in the direct determination of nutritive value of ingested herbage in grazing experiments. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, R. A. & Tilley, J. M. A. (1964). The digestibility of the leaves and stems of perennial ryegrass, cocksfoot, timothy, tall fescue, lucerne and sainfoin, as measured by an in vitro procedure. Journal of the British Grassland Society 19, 363–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh Plant Breeding Station (1974). Report of Welsh Plant Breeding Station for 1973, p. 130.Google Scholar