Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:05:17.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of inhibition of flowering on improvement of cane yield and juice quality under Coimbatore conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Sudama Singh  and
M. Sanjiva Reddy
Sudama Singh
Affiliation:
Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, India
M. Sanjiva Reddy
Affiliation:
Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of paraquat (l, 1'-dimethyl-4, 4'-dipyridylium dichloride or Gramoxone) and diquat (l,1'-ethylene-2, 2'-dipyridylium dichloride or Reglone) on inhibition of flowering and the effect of such an inhibition on improvement of cane yield and juice quality in late maturing sugarcane varieties Co. 853 (early-season flowering) and Co. 419 (mid-late season flowering) planted in February were studied under field conditions at Coimbatore (latitude 11° N). In Co. 419, the spray of paraquat @ 0·35 kg a.i./ha and diquat @ 0·45 kg a.i./ha (diluted in 3000 1 of water) in two equal doses at 3–4 day intervals during the 1st and 2nd week of August suppressed the flowering almost completely, while in Co. 853 flowering could not be checked successfully by chemical spray. Flowering in Co. 853 could be checked only when the spindle leaves were cut continuously from 15 July to 12 August at 4–5 day intervals. In Co. 419, cutting leaf spindles at any day between 1 August and 12 August prevented flowering totally.

The sprayed non-flowered crop of Co. 419 gave 13·84–15·69 t/ha more cane yield in February and 16·14–18·07 t/ha in April, whereas sugar yield increased by 1·16 t/ha in February and 3·56 t/ha in April compared with the control flowered crop. There was practically no difference in paraquat and diquat sprays. Suppression of flowering by defoliation in Co. 853 also increased the cane and sugar yield in and after February.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 87 , Issue 2 , October 1976 , pp. 375 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1936). Methods of chemical control for cane sugar factories and Gur refineries. The Sugarcane Technologists' Association of India, Cawnpore.Google Scholar
Brown, I. A. & Chambers, G. M. (1968). Control of cane flowering can increase sugar yield. World Crops 20, 65–9.Google Scholar
Burr, G. O. (1950). The flowering of sugarcane. Reports Hawaiian Sugar Technology, pp. 47–9.Google Scholar
Evans, H. (1970). Effect of flowering on loss of sugar per acre in sugarcane. International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists. Sugarcane Breeders' Newsletter 25, 52–5.Google Scholar
Garrucho, S. S. & Ramon, V. (1971). Tassel control in Hacienda Progreso. Sugar News Voice of the Philippine Sugar Industry 47, 258–60.Google Scholar
Humbert, R. P., Lima, M. & Govea, J. (1968). Tassel control progress with reglone in Mexican Sugar Industry. Proceedings International Society of Sugarcane Technologists, Taiwan 13, 462–7.Google Scholar
Panje, R. R. & Raja Rao, T. (1961). Prevention of flowering in sugarcane. Current Science 30, 211—12.Google Scholar
Panje, R. R., Raja Rao, T. & Srivastava, K. K. (1968). Studies on the prevention of flowering in sugarcane. 1. Effect of suppression of flowering by defoliation on yield and juice quality of cane. Proceedings International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, Taiwan 13, 468–75.Google Scholar
Singh, Sudama & Srivastava, K. K. (1973). Control of flowering in sugarcane with diquat and paraquat sprays. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 43, 154–8.Google Scholar
Singh, Sudama (1975). Floral initiation in sugarcane hybrids, under different months of planting at Coimbatore (latitude 11° N). International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, Sugarcane Breeders' Newsletter 36, 67–70.Google Scholar
Singh, Sudama & Reddy, M. Sanjiva (1975). Floral initiation in sugarcane at Coimbatore (latitude 11° N). International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists Sugarcane Breeders' Newsletter, 35, 50–1.Google Scholar
Tanimoto, T. & Nickell, L. G. (1965). Field control of sugarcane flowering in Hawaii with diquat. Proceedings International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, Puerto Rico 12, 113–17.Google Scholar