Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T04:58:48.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of in vitro manipulation of pH on magnesium solubility in ruminal and caecal digesta in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 1997

D. E. DALLEY
Affiliation:
Animal and Veterinary Sciences Group, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand
P. ISHERWOOD
Affiliation:
Animal and Veterinary Sciences Group, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand
A. R. SYKES
Affiliation:
Animal and Veterinary Sciences Group, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand
A. B. ROBSON
Affiliation:
Centre for Computing and Biometrics, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand

Abstract

Rumen and caecal digesta were collected, under anaesthetic, from eight sheep offered either hay, pelleted concentrate or pasture at the Johnston Memorial Laboratory, Lincoln University during 1991. Subsamples of digesta were incubated at 39°C for 1 h after adjustment of pH within the range 0·5–12 by the addition of H2SO4 or NaOH. The samples were centrifuged at 30000 g for 30 min and magnesium (Mg) concentration measured in the 30000 g supernatant fraction and in total digesta to assess Mg solubility. In rumen digesta, Mg solubility declined from 0·86 at pH 5 to 0·30 at pH 7 and differences in response between diets were small. Magnesium solubility in caecal digesta was generally higher than in ruminal digesta, and particularly at pH values >6. At pH 7 the difference was twofold. Moreover, differences were observed between diets in the rate of decline in solubility in caecal digesta with increasing pH. At pH 5, 0·90 of Mg from hay and concentrate diets was soluble compared with only 0·8 for pasture. At pH 7, Mg solubility in caecal digesta from hay and concentrate-fed animals was almost double that from pasture-fed animals (0·64 and 0·62 v. 0·36, respectively). The implications of the findings for Mg homoeostasis in ruminants are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)